Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/sage/social-agency-and-white-supremacy-in-immigration-studies-3k8YCxHHPJ
- Publisher
- SAGE
- Copyright
- © American Sociological Association 2014
- ISSN
- 2332-6492
- eISSN
- 2332-6506
- DOI
- 10.1177/2332649214560796
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Assimilation scholarship is rooted in the race relations framework that has been critiqued for providing legitimacy to the prevailing racial order, not least because it credits ethno-racial group agency as the mechanism that causes inequities among groups’ socioeconomic outcomes and the degrees to which they are socially accepted. To explain socioeconomic inequities, alternative frames centering on racialization and structural racism look to white supremacy and the unequal ends it engenders, but the sociological theory developed in these alternatives is largely tangential to assimilation theory. That the assimilationist model still dominates leaves a key part of the discipline vulnerable to supporting white supremacist ideologies about societies falsely believed to be colorblindly meritocratic. For this reason I call upon sociologists to work together to dethrone assimilationism from its exalted status in the sociology of immigration and scholars of race knowledgeable in these alternative approaches to actively reenter the arena of immigration studies and take the ground that has been ceded to the assimilationist frame. I suggest these as next steps in a campaign to overturn the dominance of the race relations model in sociology as a whole.
Journal
Sociology of Race and Ethnicity – SAGE
Published: Jan 1, 2015