Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
This paper looks at some of the major texts in the history of role theory. Thequestion that is asked is whether any of these works have been able to theorizethe self adequately. It is suggested that neither Parsons nor Merton has anyplace for the self in their respective theories. While Goffman does make a spacefor the self, it is only a negative space. Even ethnomethodological theorycannot imagine a role player capable of self-expression. It is argued that asolution to the problem of how to conceive of self and role can be developedfrom some ideas present in the work of the philosopher Lawrence Blum. Theconcept of self as identity that can be extracted from his work can allow socialtheory to imagine actors who are simultaneously expressing their selves andfulfilling their roles. Affinities between this idea and some key concepts intheories of both (Alan) Blum and Peter McHugh and Charles Taylor aresuggested.
Sociological Research Online – SAGE
Published: Jul 1, 1999
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.