Response to Taylor and de Beer (2018) on population based norms and IQ testing

Response to Taylor and de Beer (2018) on population based norms and IQ testing 747170 SAP0010.1177/0081246317747170South African Journal of PsychologyShuttleworth-Edwards research-article2017 South African Journal of Psychology 2018, Vol. 48(2) 175 –178 © The Author(s) 2017 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246317747170 DOI: 10.1177/0081246317747170 journals.sagepub.com/home/sap Response Response to Taylor and de Beer (2018) on population based norms and IQ testing Ann B Shuttleworth-Edwards Keywords Wechsler IQ test, Norms, Cross-cultural Taylor and de Beer (2018) have suggested that a recent publication (Shuttleworth-Edwards, 2017) involves “broad, unsubstantiated claims regarding the lack of utility of population norms for use in cognitive assessments,” with the further implication that the content of this publication may not be “empirical, objective and defensible” (p. 171). The purpose of the present response is to refute this and to show that Shuttleworth-Edwards’ position is (a) empirically based in clinically relevant South African data and (b) objective in the sense of being substantiated by a scientific chain of reasoning that underpins the development and application of normative data as a basis for conduct- ing valid intellectual assessments in multicultural settings. Shuttleworth-Edwards has argued that the use of population-based norms in culturally diverse contexts is clinically and scientifically indefensible, thereby calling into question the validity of the South African standardization of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png South African Journal of Psychology SAGE

Response to Taylor and de Beer (2018) on population based norms and IQ testing

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/response-to-taylor-and-de-beer-2018-on-population-based-norms-and-iq-n04I0BFbYa
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2017
ISSN
0081-2463
eISSN
2078-8208
D.O.I.
10.1177/0081246317747170
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

747170 SAP0010.1177/0081246317747170South African Journal of PsychologyShuttleworth-Edwards research-article2017 South African Journal of Psychology 2018, Vol. 48(2) 175 –178 © The Author(s) 2017 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246317747170 DOI: 10.1177/0081246317747170 journals.sagepub.com/home/sap Response Response to Taylor and de Beer (2018) on population based norms and IQ testing Ann B Shuttleworth-Edwards Keywords Wechsler IQ test, Norms, Cross-cultural Taylor and de Beer (2018) have suggested that a recent publication (Shuttleworth-Edwards, 2017) involves “broad, unsubstantiated claims regarding the lack of utility of population norms for use in cognitive assessments,” with the further implication that the content of this publication may not be “empirical, objective and defensible” (p. 171). The purpose of the present response is to refute this and to show that Shuttleworth-Edwards’ position is (a) empirically based in clinically relevant South African data and (b) objective in the sense of being substantiated by a scientific chain of reasoning that underpins the development and application of normative data as a basis for conduct- ing valid intellectual assessments in multicultural settings. Shuttleworth-Edwards has argued that the use of population-based norms in culturally diverse contexts is clinically and scientifically indefensible, thereby calling into question the validity of the South African standardization of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale,

Journal

South African Journal of PsychologySAGE

Published: Jun 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off