Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Sherif, H. Cantril (1946)
The psychology of attitudes.Psychological review, 53
C. Jurgensen (1944)
Report on the "Classification Inventory," a personality test for industrial use.Journal of Applied Psychology, 28
E. Smith, R. Tyler (1942)
Appraising and recording student progress
F. Swineford (1938)
The measurement of a personality trait.Journal of Educational Psychology, 29
A. Campbell (1945)
Two problems in the use of the open question.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 40
B. Wood
Studies of achievement tests. Part I: The R versus the R-W method of scoring "do not guess" true-false examinations.Journal of Educational Psychology, 17
S. Fernberger
The use of equality judgments in psychophysical procedures.Psychological Review, 37
S. Sargent (1942)
How shall we study individual differencesPsychological Review, 49
M. Viteles (1945)
The aircraft pilot: 5 years of research; a summary of outcomes.Psychological Bulletin, 42
C. Anderson, L. Cronbach (1943)
Exploring the Wartime Morale of High-School Youth.American Sociological Review, 8
R. Simpson (1944)
The specific meanings of certain terms indicating differing degrees of frequency.Quarterly Journal of Speech, 30
E. Rundquist (1940)
Form of statement in personality measurement.Journal of Educational Psychology, 31
Statistical h/lethods for Closed Systems
R. Seashore (1939)
Work methods: an often neglected factor underlying individual differences.Psychological Review, 46
F. Gritten, D. Johnson (1941)
Individual differences in judging multiple-choice questions.Journal of Educational Psychology, 32
(1944)
Adolescence, 43rd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education
F. Swineford (1941)
Analysis of a personality trait.Journal of Educational Psychology, 32
R. Wyatt (1945)
Improvability of pitch discrimination.The Psychological Monographs, 58
(1914)
The Ordinary Objective Test. as a Possible Criterion of Certain Personality Traits
(1929)
The Effects of Different Directions and Scoring Methods on the Reliability of a True-False Test
C. Osgood (1941)
Ease of Individual Judgment-Processes in Relation to Polarization of Attitudes in the CultureJournal of Social Psychology, 14
L. Cronbach (1941)
An experimental comparison of the multiple true-false and multiple multiple-choice tests.Journal of Educational Psychology, 32
(1941)
The True-False Test: a Reply t o Count -Etoxinod
R. Wherry, R. Gaylord (1944)
Factor pattern of test items and tests as a function of the correlation coefficient: Content, difficulty, and constant error factorsPsychometrika, 9
L. Cronbach (1942)
Studies of acquiescence as a factor in the true-false test.Journal of Educational Psychology, 33
P. Eisenberg (1941)
Individual Interpretation Of Psychoneurotic Inventory ItemsJournal of General Psychology, 25
C. Mosier (1941)
A Psychometric Study of MeaningJournal of Social Psychology, 13
(1938)
Acquiescence as a Factor in the hleasurement of Personality
W. Hall, F. Robinson (1945)
An analytical approach to the study of reading skills.Journal of Educational Psychology, 36
J. Guilford (1941)
The difficulty of a test and its factor compositionPsychometrika, 6
LEE J. CRONBACH University of Chicago A PSYCHOLOGICAL or educational test is constructed, by choosing items of the desired content, and refining them by empirical techniques. The assumption is generally made, and validated as well as possible, ,that what the test measures is determined by the content oflthe items. Yet the final score of the person on any test is a composite of effects resulting from the content of the item and effects resulting from the form of item used. A test supposedly measuring one variable may also be measuring another trait which would not influence the score if another type of item were used. This paper attempts to demonstrate these influences in a variety of tests, to examine the effect of these extraneous factors, and to suggest means of controlling them. Numerous studies show that scores may be influenced by variables other than the one sppposedly tested. In the Min- nerotn Mziltiphasic Personality Inveatory, for example, it is expIicitly recognized that a spbject may evade questions by the excessive use of the response “Cannot Say,” even though his actual behavior might be properly described by the response “True” or “False.” This tendency invalidates the test profile for persons
Educational and Psychological Measurement – SAGE
Published: Dec 1, 1946
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.