Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Isabelle Breton-Miller, Danny Miller (2018)
Looking Back at and Forward From: “Family Governance and Firm Performance: Agency, Stewardship, and Capabilities”Family Business Review, 31
Pramodita Sharma, C. Salvato, T. Reay (2014)
Temporal Dimensions of Family Enterprise ResearchFamily Business Review, 27
Dennis Gioia, Kevin Corley, A. Hamilton (2013)
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive ResearchOrganizational Research Methods, 16
J. Daspit, Daniel Holt, James Chrisman, Rebecca Long (2016)
Examining Family Firm Succession From a Social Exchange PerspectiveFamily Business Review, 29
Justin Craig, C. Salvato (2012)
The Distinctiveness, Design, and Direction of Family Business ResearchFamily Business Review, 25
Sohrab Soleimanof, Matthew Rutherford, Justin Webb (2018)
The Intersection of Family Firms and Institutional Contexts: A Review and Agenda for Future ResearchFamily Business Review, 31
W. Dyer (2006)
Examining the 'Family Effect' on Firm PerformanceLabor: Demographics & Economics of the Family eJournal
Peter Jaskiewicz, Katharina Heinrichs, Sabine Rau, T. Reay (2016)
To Be or Not to Be: How Family Firms Manage Family and Commercial Logics in SuccessionEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40
Danny Miller, Isabelle Breton-Miller (2006)
Family Governance and Firm Performance: Agency, Stewardship, and CapabilitiesFamily Business Review, 19
K. Madison, F. Kellermanns, T. Munyon (2017)
Coexisting Agency and Stewardship Governance in Family Firms: An Empirical Investigation of Individual-Level and Firm-Level EffectsFamily Business Review, 30
S. Zahra, Pramodita Sharma (2004)
Family Business Research: A Strategic ReflectionFamily Business Review, 17
Sabine Rau, J. Astrachan, K. Smyrnios (2018)
The F-PEC Revisited: From the Family Business Definition Dilemma to Foundation of TheoryFamily Business Review, 31
M. Cabrera‐Suárez, Desiderio García-Almeida, Petra Saá-Pérez (2018)
A Dynamic Network Model of the Successor’s Knowledge Construction From the Resource- and Knowledge-Based View of the Family FirmFamily Business Review, 31
W. Dyer (2018)
Are Family Firms Really Better? Reexamining “Examining the ‘Family Effect’ on Firm Performance”Family Business Review, 31
James Cook (2014)
Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research
S. Zahra (2005)
Entrepreneurial Risk Taking in Family FirmsFamily Business Review, 18
S. Zahra (2018)
Entrepreneurial Risk Taking in Family Firms: The Wellspring of the Regenerative CapabilityFamily Business Review, 31
K. Eisenhardt, Melissa Graebner (2007)
Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And ChallengesAcademy of Management Journal, 50
D. Fletcher, A. Massis, Matthias Nordqvist (2016)
Qualitative research practices and family business scholarship: a review and future research agendaJournal of Family Business Strategy, 7
Ronald Mitchell, Bradley Agle, James Chrisman, L. Spence (2011)
Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Salience in Family Firms1Business Ethics Quarterly, 21
Marianne Lewis (2000)
Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive GuideAcademy of Management Review, 25
W. Dyer, W. Dyer (2009)
Putting the Family Into Family Business ResearchFamily Business Review, 22
R. Evert, John Martin, Michael McLeod, G. Payne (2016)
Empirics in Family Business ResearchFamily Business Review, 29
G. Payne, Allison Pearson, J. Carr (2017)
Process and Variance ModelingFamily Business Review, 30
(2012)
The Landscape of Family Business Outcomes: A Summary and Numerical Taxonomy of Dependent Variables
Aaron Anglin, S. Reid, J. Short, Miles Zachary, Matthew Rutherford (2017)
An Archival Approach to Measuring Family InfluenceFamily Business Review, 30
Peter Jaskiewicz, W. Dyer (2017)
Addressing the Elephant in the Room: Disentangling Family Heterogeneity to Advance Family Business ResearchFamily Business Review, 30
R. Evert, J. Sears, John Martin, G. Payne (2018)
Family ownership and family involvement as antecedents of strategic action: A longitudinal study of initial international entryJournal of Business Research, 84
K. Weick (1995)
What Theory Is Not, Theorizing IsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 40
James Chrisman, J. Chua, A. Massis, T. Minola, S. Vismara (2016)
Management processes and strategy execution in family firms: from “what” to “how”Small Business Economics, 47
D. Whetten (1989)
What Constitutes a Theoretical ContributionAcademy of Management Review, 14
Antonio Revilla, Ana Pérez-Luño, M. Nieto (2016)
Does Family Involvement in Management Reduce the Risk of Business Failure? The Moderating Role of Entrepreneurial OrientationFamily Business Review, 29
David Miller, L. Steier, Isabelle Breton-Miller (2003)
Lost in time: intergenerational succession, change, and failure in family businessJournal of Business Venturing, 18
S. Shane, S. Venkataraman (2000)
The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of ResearchAcademy of Management Review, 25
Albert James, Jennifer Jennings, P. Jennings (2017)
Is It Better to Govern Managers via Agency or Stewardship? Examining Asymmetries by Family Versus Nonfamily AffiliationFamily Business Review, 30
Reginald Litz (2008)
Two Sides of a One-Sided Phenomenon: Conceptualizing the Family Business and Business Family as a Möbius StripFamily Business Review, 21
Tobias Dehlen, T. Zellweger, Nadine Kammerlander, F. Halter (2014)
The role of information asymmetry in the choice of entrepreneurial exit routesJournal of Business Venturing, 29
Isabelle Breton-Miller, Danny Miller, L. Steier (2004)
Toward an Integrative Model of Effective FOB SuccessionEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28
Sabine Rau (2014)
Resource-Based View of Family Firms
J. Astrachan, Sabine Klein, K. Smyrnios (2002)
The F-PEC Scale of Family Influence: A Proposal for Solving the Family Business Definition Problem1Family Business Review, 15
Pramodita Sharma, James Chrisman, K. Gersick (2012)
25 Years of Family Business ReviewFamily Business Review, 25
Teresa Nelson, C. Constantinidis (2017)
Sex and Gender in Family Business Succession Research: A Review and Forward Agenda From a Social Construction PerspectiveFamily Business Review, 30
T. Reay, D. Whetten (2011)
What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution in Family Business?Family Business Review, 24
K. Moores (2009)
Paradigms and Theory Building in the Domain of Business FamiliesFamily Business Review, 22
M. Wright, James Chrisman, J. Chua, L. Steier (2014)
Family Enterprise and ContextWiley-Blackwell: Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice
Daniel Holt, Allison Pearson, G. Payne, Pramodita Sharma (2018)
Family Business Research as a Boundary-Spanning PlatformFamily Business Review, 31
R. Swedberg (2012)
Theorizing in sociology and social science: turning to the context of discoveryTheory and Society, 41
D. Doty, William Glick (1994)
Typologies As a Unique Form Of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and ModelingAcademy of Management Review, 19
S. Zahra, M. Wright (2011)
Entrepreneurship's Next ActAcademy of Management Perspectives, 25
Keith Brigham, G. Lumpkin, G. Payne, Miles Zachary (2014)
Researching Long-Term OrientationFamily Business Review, 27
María Rodríguez, R. Basco (2011)
The Cognitive Legitimacy of the Family Business FieldFamily Business Review, 24
David Sirmon, M. Hitt (2003)
Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management, and Wealth Creation in Family FirmsEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27
Katiuska Cabrera-Suárez, Petra Saá-Pérez, Desiderio García-Almeida (2001)
The Succession Process from a Resource- and Knowledge-Based View of the Family FirmFamily Business Review, 14
776550 FBRXXX10.1177/0894486518776550Family Business ReviewPayne editorial2018 Editorial Family Business Review 2018, Vol. 31(2) 167 –175 © The Author(s) 2018 Reflections on Family Business Research: Reprints and permissions: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Considering Domains and Theory https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518776550 DOI: 10.1177/0894486518776550 journals.sagepub.com/home/fbr G. Tyge Payne We are all just prisoners here, of our own device. different backgrounds, and is disseminated through such a sundry of unique outlets, that it is often difficult —The Eagles (Don Felder, Don Henley, Glenn Frey) for people to identify and understand the distinguishing nature of the field. This difficulty is particularly prob- Most scholars devoted to the study of organizations lematic if family business scholars fail to clearly articu- are familiar with the classic questions regarding the rea- late which constructs and phenomena are within its sons for the existence, variation, and perpetuation of boundaries and develop unique theories that explain organizations. In family business research, our central them. For, like any field of study, the challenge of gain- questions align closely with those of the classic organi- ing and maintaining legitimacy involves addressing and zation theory domain: Why do family businesses exist? balancing breadth (i.e., crossing disciplinary boundar- How do family businesses change and survive? How ies) and depth (i.e.,
Family Business Review – SAGE
Published: Jun 1, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.