Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Xavier Drèze, Stephen Hoch, Mary Purk (1994)
Shelf management and space elasticityJournal of Retailing, 70
J. Beck (1974)
Adaptation-level theory.contemporary Psychology, 19
Yigang Pan, D. Lehmann (1993)
The Influence of New Brand Entry on Subjective Brand JudgmentsJournal of Consumer Research, 20
Patrick Kirschling (1997)
Home Shopping Programs: a Strategic Guide
Bawa Kapil (1989)
471Journal of Retailing, 65
D. Glaser, Karl Friston (2003)
Variance Components
(1964)
On the Flexibility of Future Preferences,
Susan Broniarczyk, Wayne Hoyer, L. McAlister (1998)
Consumers’ Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category: The Impact of Item ReductionJournal of Marketing Research, 35
(1993)
Variety or Duplication: A Process to Know Where You Stand," report prepared by Willard Bishop Consulting and Information Resources Inc. in cooperation with Frito-Lay
S. Arnold, T. Oum, D. Tigert (1983)
Determinant Attributes in Retail Patronage: Seasonal, Temporal, Regional, and International ComparisonsJournal of Marketing Research, 20
David Kreps (1979)
A REPRESENTATION THEOREM FOR "PREFERENCE FOR FLEXIBILITY"Econometrica, 47
(2000)
When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?
Jaehwan Kim, Greg Allenby, Peter Rossi (2002)
Modeling Consumer Demand for VarietyMarketing Science, 21
D. Reibstein, S. Youngblood, H. Fromkin (1975)
Number of choices and perceived decision freedom as a determinant of satisfaction and consumer behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, 60
J. Guiltinan (2002)
Choice and Variety in Antitrust Law: A Marketing PerspectiveJournal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21
B. Kahn (1995)
Consumer variety-seeking among goods and services: An integrative reviewJournal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2
(1998)
Grocery Shopping Online,
Stephen Hoch, Eric Bradlow, B. Wansink (1999)
The Variety of an AssortmentMarketing Science, 18
W. Baumol, Edward Ide (1956)
Variety in RetailingManagement Science, 3
A. Parducci, H. Helson (1964)
Adaptation-level theory
B. Kahn, D. Lehmann (1991)
Modeling choice among assortments.Journal of Retailing, 67
K. Bawa, J. Landwehr, Aradhna Krishna (1989)
Consumer Response to Retailers' Marketing Environments: An Analysis of Coffee Purchase Data
Greg Allenby, Neeraj Arora, James Ginter (1998)
On the Heterogeneity of DemandJournal of Marketing Research, 35
P. Fader, Bruce Hardie (1996)
Modeling Consumer Choice among SKUsJournal of Marketing Research, 33
Sunil Gupta (1988)
Impact of Sales Promotions on when, what, and how Much to BuyJournal of Marketing Research, 25
Most supermarket categories are cluttered with items, or stockkeeping units (SKUs), that differ very little at the attribute level. Previous research has found that reductions (up to 54%) in the number of low-selling SKUs need not affect perceptions of variety and therefore sales, significantly. In this research, the authors analyze data from a natural experiment conducted by an online grocer, in which 94% of the categories experienced dramatic cuts in the number of SKUs offered, particularly low-selling SKUs. Sales were indeed affected dramatically, increasing an average of 11% across the 42 categories examined. Sales rose in more than two-thirds of these categories, nearly half of which experienced an increase of 10% or more; 75% of households increased their overall expenditures after the cut in SKUs. In turn, the authors examine how different types of SKU reductions—defined by how the cuts affect the available attributes or features of a category (e.g., the number of brands)—affected purchase behavior differently. The results indicate that consumers experienced divergent reactions to the reduction in sizes, but they uniformly welcomed the elimination of clutter brought on by the reduction in redundant items. In addition, of households that were loyal to a single brand, size, or brand–size combination that was eliminated, nearly half continued purchasing within the category. Also, contrary to previous research on SKU reductions, the authors find that category sales depend on the total number of SKUs offered. The authors extend the previous research by showing that (1) category sales depend on the availability of key product and category attributes and (2) two particularly important attributes to consumers in an assortment are brand and flavor.
Journal of Marketing – SAGE
Published: Jul 1, 2001
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.