Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Senge (1997)
THE FIFTH DISCIPLINEMeasuring Business Excellence, 1
H. Simon (1991)
Bounded Rationality and Organizational LearningOrganization Science, 2
C. Covington (1981)
The Presidency as a Learning Organization: The Development of Organizational Memory Within Presidential Agencies
K. Hwang (1987)
Face and Favor: The Chinese Power GameAmerican Journal of Sociology, 92
P. Hawkins (1994)
Organizational LearningManagement Learning, 25
K. Weick (1969)
The social psychology of organizing
P. Lawrence, J. Lorsch (1967)
Organization and environment
Samuel Bacharach (1989)
Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for EvaluationAcademy of Management Review, 14
P. Rosenzweig (1994)
When can management science research be generalized internationallyManagement Science, 40
T. Jick (1979)
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.Administrative Science Quarterly, 24
(1974)
Heuristics and Biases
Daniel Levinthal, J. March (1993)
The myopia of learningSouthern Medical Journal, 14
P. Nystrom, W. Starbuck (1984)
To Avoid Organizational Crises, UnlearnOrganizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal
V. Cangelosi, W. Dill (1965)
ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: OBSERVATIONS TOWARD A THEORY,Administrative Science Quarterly, 10
E. Stein (1989)
Organizational memory : socio-technical framework and empirical research
J. Sullivan, I. Nonaka (1986)
The Application of Organizational Learning Theory to Japanese and American ManagementJournal of International Business Studies, 17
Richard Osborn, Patrick Connor (1982)
Handbook of Organizational Design. Vol. 1: Adapting Organizations to Their Environments.Academy of Management Review, 7
G. Huber (1991)
Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the LiteraturesOrganization Science, 2
R. Yin (1984)
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
R. Daft, K. Weick (1984)
Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation SystemsAcademy of Management Review, 9
I. Nonaka (1994)
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge CreationOrganization Science, 5
Kathleen Carley (1992)
Organizational Learning and Personnel TurnoverOrganization Science, 3
D. Ho (1976)
On the Concept of FaceAmerican Journal of Sociology, 81
Michael Cohen, J. March, Johan Olsen (1972)
A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.Administrative Science Quarterly, 17
Siu-lun Wong (1985)
The Chinese Family Firm: A ModelFamily Business Review, 6
Chris Dawson (1994)
Human Resource AccountingManagement Decision, 32
K. Thomas, W. Tymon (1982)
Necessary Properties of Relevant Research: Lessons from Recent Criticisms of the Organizational SciencesAcademy of Management Review, 7
Victor Limlingan (1986)
The overseas Chinese in ASEAN : Business strategies and management practices
P. Shrivastava (1983)
A TYPOLOGY OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING SYSTEMSJournal of Management Studies, 20
P. Shrivastava, S. Schneider (1984)
Organizational Frames of ReferenceHuman Relations, 37
Adel Zayed (1989)
Toward an organizational learning model for bureaucratic organizations : a strategic management perspective
D. Yanow (1993)
Culture and Organizational LearningJournal of Management Inquiry, 20
H. Sims, Dennis Gioia (1986)
The thinking organization
G. Hofstede (1993)
Cultural constraints in management theoriesAcademy of Management Perspectives, 7
Chimezie Osigweh (1989)
Concept Fallibility in Organizational ScienceAcademy of Management Review, 14
H. Hu (1944)
THE CHINESE CONCEPTS OF “FACE”American Anthropologist, 46
Davide Nicolini, Martin Meznar (1995)
The Social Construction of Organizational Learning: Conceptual and Practical Issues in the FieldHuman Relations, 48
H. Tsoukas (1991)
The Missing Link: A Transformational View of Metaphors in Organizational ScienceAcademy of Management Review, 16
J. Kao (1993)
The worldwide web of Chinese businessHarvard Business Review, 71
J. Morrison, L. Olfman (1998)
Organizational MemoryProceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1
A. Ven (1989)
Nothing Is Quite So Practical as a Good TheoryAcademy of Management Review, 14
I. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi (1995)
The Knowledge-Creating Company: How
C. Fiol (1994)
Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations.Organization Science, 5
P. Shrivastava, I. Mitroff (1984)
Enhancing Organizational Research Utilization: The Role of Decision Makers' AssumptionsAcademy of Management Review, 9
B. Hedberg (1981)
How Organizations Learn and Unlearn
C. Pinder, V. Bourgeois (1982)
Controlling Tropes in Administrative Science.Administrative Science Quarterly, 27
J. Child, Ĺ. Markóczy (1993)
HOST‐COUNTRY MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOUR AND LEARNING IN CHINESE AND HUNGARIAN JOINT VENTURES*Journal of Management Studies, 30
G. Susman, R. Evered (1978)
An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research.Administrative Science Quarterly, 23
C. Argyris, Donald Schön (1978)
Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective
L. Etheredge, J. Short (1983)
THINKING ABOUT GOVERNMENT LEARNINGJournal of Management Studies, 20
I. Nonaka, P. Byosiere, Chester Borucki, N. Konno (1994)
Organizational knowledge creation theory: A first comprehensive testInternational Business Review, 3
J. Banbury (1978)
Prescriptive Models of OrganisationsJournal of the Operational Research Society, 29
G. Redding (1995)
The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism
Bernard Simonin (1991)
Transfer of knowledge in international strategic alliances: A structural approach.
Marjorie Lyles (1987)
Learning among joint venture sophisticated firms
J. March, L. Sproull, M. Tamuz (1991)
Learning from samples of one or fewer*Quality and Safety in Health Care, 12
A. Meyer (1982)
Adapting to environmental jolts.Administrative science quarterly, 27 4
Daniel Kim (1993)
A framework and methodology for linking individual and organizational learning : applications in TQM and product development
A. Bedeian (1986)
Contemporary Challenges in the Study of OrganizationsJournal of Management, 12
D. Ulrich, T. Jick, M. Glinow (1993)
High-impact learning: Building and diffusing learning capabilityOrganizational Dynamics, 22
P. Shrivastava (1981)
Strategic decision making process : the influence of organizational learning and experience
Despite the growing popularity of the term 'organizational learning," writings on the topic have little consensus in terms of definition, perspective, conceptualization, and methodology. This article examines the dichotomy between two main streams of theorizing in the field. The first stream, prescriptive writings on the learning organization, is concerned with the question "How should an organization learn?" Targeting practitioners, these studies are usually based on the authors' consulting experience and seldom follow rigorous research methodologies. They also tend to overgeneralize their theories to all types of organization. Descriptive researches on organizational learning fall in the second stream which tackles the question "How does an organization learn?" These are academic studies striving for scientific rigor. Nevertheless, they often fail to generate useful implications for practitioners. In the final section of the article, brief suggestions are made to integrate the two streams of research.
Human Relations – SAGE
Published: Apr 22, 2016
Keywords: organizational learning,learning organization,descriptive research,prescriptive research
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.