Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Numbers and Attitudes towards Welfare State Generosity

Numbers and Attitudes towards Welfare State Generosity Between pro-retrenchment politicians and segments of the media, exaggerated claims about the generous benefits enjoyed by those on welfare are relatively common. But to what extent, and under what conditions, can they actually shape attitudes towards welfare? This study explores these questions via a survey experiment conducted in the UK, examining: (1) the extent to which the value of the claimed figure matters; (2) if the presence of anchoring information about minimum wage income has an impact; and (3) whether these effects differ based on egalitarianism and political knowledge. Results suggest that increasing the size of the claimed figure decreases support in a broadly linear fashion, with anchoring information important only when (asserted) benefit levels are modestly above the minimum wage income. Egalitarianism, in turn, primarily matters when especially low figures are placed alongside information about minimum wage, while low-knowledge respondents were more susceptible to anchoring effects than high-knowledge ones. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Political Studies SAGE

Numbers and Attitudes towards Welfare State Generosity

Political Studies , Volume 67 (2): 21 – May 1, 2019

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/numbers-and-attitudes-towards-welfare-state-generosity-dYj0BZqQej
Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2018
ISSN
0032-3217
eISSN
1467-9248
DOI
10.1177/0032321718780516
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Between pro-retrenchment politicians and segments of the media, exaggerated claims about the generous benefits enjoyed by those on welfare are relatively common. But to what extent, and under what conditions, can they actually shape attitudes towards welfare? This study explores these questions via a survey experiment conducted in the UK, examining: (1) the extent to which the value of the claimed figure matters; (2) if the presence of anchoring information about minimum wage income has an impact; and (3) whether these effects differ based on egalitarianism and political knowledge. Results suggest that increasing the size of the claimed figure decreases support in a broadly linear fashion, with anchoring information important only when (asserted) benefit levels are modestly above the minimum wage income. Egalitarianism, in turn, primarily matters when especially low figures are placed alongside information about minimum wage, while low-knowledge respondents were more susceptible to anchoring effects than high-knowledge ones.

Journal

Political StudiesSAGE

Published: May 1, 2019

There are no references for this article.