Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Petersen, Rune Slothuus, Rune Stubager, Lise Togeby (2011)
Deservingness versus values in public opinion on welfare: The automaticity of the deservingness heuristicEuropean Journal of Political Research, 50
N. Giger, Moira Nelson (2013)
The Welfare State or the Economy? Preferences, Constituencies, and Strategies for RetrenchmentEuropean Sociological Review, 29
James Allan, L. Scruggs (2004)
Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial SocietiesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 48
P. Taylor-Gooby, C. Hastie, C. Bromley (2003)
Querulous Citizens: Welfare Knowledge and the Limits to Welfare ReformSocial Policy & Administration, 37
J. Kuklinski, P. Quirk, Jennifer Jerit, David Schwieder, R. Rich (2000)
Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic CitizenshipThe Journal of Politics, 62
N. Giger, Moira Nelson (2011)
The electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment: Blame avoidance or credit claiming in the era of permanent austerity?European Journal of Political Research, 50
Jennifer Jerit (2009)
How Predictive Appeals Affect Policy OpinionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 53
Dennis Chong, J. Druckman (2007)
Framing Public Opinion in Competitive DemocraciesAmerican Political Science Review, 101
B. Geiger, Kate Bell, D. Gaffney (2012)
Benefits stigma in Britain
W. Korpi, Joakim Palme (2003)
New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975–95American Political Science Review, 97
Jason Barabas (2011)
Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and PolicyPublic Opinion Quarterly, 75
(2019)
The Role of GovernmentEnvironmental Economics and Natural Resource Management
L. Stanley, T. Hartman (2018)
Tax Preferences, Fiscal Transparency, and the Meaning of Welfare: An Experimental StudyPolitical Studies, 66
S. Soroka, Christopher Wlezien (2010)
Public Opinion and Public Policy
S. Ansolabehere, Brian Schaffner (2011)
Does Survey Mode Still Matter? Findings from a 2010 Multi-Mode ComparisonPolitical Analysis, 22
J. Zaller, S. Feldman (1992)
A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing PreferencesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 36
B. Geiger (2016)
Benefit ‘Myths’? The Accuracy and Inaccuracy of Public Beliefs about the Benefits SystemSocial Policy & Administration, 52
(2006)
Political Studies. Epub ahead of print 14 November. DOI: 10.1177/0032321717731661
S. Feldman, Christopher Johnston (2014)
Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural ComplexityPolitical Psychology, 35
William Jacoby (1994)
Public Attitudes toward Government SpendingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 38
Elias Naumann (2015)
Do increasing reform pressures change welfare state attitudes? An experimental study on population ageing, pension reform preferences, political knowledge and ideologyAgeing and Society, 37
E. Lawrence, John Sides (2014)
The consequences of political innumeracyResearch & Politics, 1
J. Druckman, Jordana Fein, Thomas Leeper (2012)
A Source of Bias in Public Opinion StabilityAmerican Political Science Review, 106
L. Skitka, P. Tetlock (1993)
Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65
C. Jensen (2014)
The Right and the Welfare State
M. Carpini, S. Keeter (1996)
What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters
C. Jensen, M. Petersen (2017)
The Deservingness Heuristic and the Politics of Health CareAmerican Journal of Political Science, 61
S. Lee, C. Jensen, C. Arndt, Georg Wenzelburger (2017)
Risky Business? Welfare State Reforms and Government Support in Britain and DenmarkBritish Journal of Political Science, 50
M. Jæger (2011)
Do we all (dis)like the same welfare state? Configurations of public support for the welfare state in comparative perspective
G. Cruces, Ricardo Perez-Truglia, Martín Tetaz (2011)
Biased Perceptions of Income Distribution and Preferences for Redistribution: Evidence from a Survey ExperimentERN: Models of Political Processes: Rent-Seeking
Larry Bartels (2005)
Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American MindPerspectives on Politics, 3
B. Geiger, Bart Meueleman (2016)
Beyond 'mythbusting': how to respond to myths and perceived undeservingness in the British benefits systemThe Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 24
M. Petersen (2015)
Evolutionary Political Psychology: On the Origin and Structure of Heuristics and Biases in PoliticsPolitical Psychology, 36
Philipp Lergetporer, Guido Schwerdt, Katharina Werner, Ludger Woessmann (2016)
Information and Preferences for Public Spending: Evidence from Representative Survey ExperimentsEconometrics: Multiple Equation Models eJournal
W. Oorschot (2006)
Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare statesJournal of European Social Policy, 16
(2016)
The Benefit Cap. London: House of Commons Library
Kimmo Grönlund, Henry Milner (2006)
The Determinants of Political Knowledge in Comparative PerspectiveScandinavian Political Studies, 29
D. Kaplan (2004)
The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences
(1996)
NatCen Social Research, pp.1–18
Elizabeth Dunn, Emma Buchtel, L. Aknin (2011)
Consensus at the Heart of Division: Commentary on Norton and Ariely (2011)Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6
K. Okma (1998)
Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of RetrenchmentJournal of Health Politics Policy and Law, 23
S. Ansolabehere, M. Meredith, E. Snowberg (2013)
Asking About Numbers: Why and HowPolitical Analysis, 21
Rune Slothuus (2007)
Framing Deservingness to Win Support for Welfare State RetrenchmentScandinavian Political Studies, 30
B. Geiger (2017)
False Beliefs and the Perceived Deservingness of Social Security Benefit Claimants
Georg Wenzelburger, Felix Hörisch (2016)
Framing Effects and Comparative Social Policy Reform: Comparing Blame Avoidance Evidence from Two ExperimentsJournal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18
Anthony Kevins (2017)
Expanding Welfare in an Age of Austerity: Increasing Protection in an Unprotected World
Brian Gaines, J. Kuklinski, P. Quirk (2007)
The Logic of the Survey Experiment ReexaminedPolitical Analysis, 15
L. Jacobs, R. Shapiro (1999)
Myths and misunderstandings about public opinion toward Social Security: knowledge, support, and reformism
Charles Taber, M. Lodge (2006)
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political BeliefsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 50
Gijs Schumacher, B. Vis, Kees Kersbergen (2013)
Political parties’ welfare image, electoral punishment and welfare state retrenchmentComparative European Politics, 11
Tracey Jensen, Imogen Tyler (2015)
‘Benefits broods’: The cultural and political crafting of anti-welfare commonsenseCritical Social Policy, 35
T. Ryan (2014)
Reconsidering Moral Issues in PoliticsThe Journal of Politics, 76
S. Treier, D. Hillygus, Christopher Federico, Paul Goren, Dean Lacy, Andrew Martin, Caroline Tolbert, C. Gay, D. Carpenter, K. Quinn, E. Schickler (2009)
The Nature of Political Ideology in the Contemporary ElectoratePublic Opinion Quarterly, 73
Clem Brooks, Jeff Manza (2007)
Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies
(2017)
Can Citizens Be Framed? How Information More Than Emphasis Changes
Anthony Kevins (2019)
Dualized trust: risk, social trust and the welfare stateSocio-economic Review, 17
Daniel Bischof (2017)
New Graphic Schemes for Stata: Plotplain and PlottigThe Stata Journal, 17
N. Winter (2017)
MPLOTOFFSET: Stata module to produce marginsplots with offset plotting symbolsStatistical Software Components
Between pro-retrenchment politicians and segments of the media, exaggerated claims about the generous benefits enjoyed by those on welfare are relatively common. But to what extent, and under what conditions, can they actually shape attitudes towards welfare? This study explores these questions via a survey experiment conducted in the UK, examining: (1) the extent to which the value of the claimed figure matters; (2) if the presence of anchoring information about minimum wage income has an impact; and (3) whether these effects differ based on egalitarianism and political knowledge. Results suggest that increasing the size of the claimed figure decreases support in a broadly linear fashion, with anchoring information important only when (asserted) benefit levels are modestly above the minimum wage income. Egalitarianism, in turn, primarily matters when especially low figures are placed alongside information about minimum wage, while low-knowledge respondents were more susceptible to anchoring effects than high-knowledge ones.
Political Studies – SAGE
Published: Jun 8, 2018
Keywords: welfare state; benefit generosity; public opinion; United Kingdom
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.