Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Northern Ireland

Northern Ireland 96 Adoption & Fostering 47(1) potential risks to the child were such that Children Act 1989 – the effect of a care the court should take the very unusual step order. of granting a declaration that the child The court found further that section 100, could be given medication immediately which prevents the court giving leave to a after birth without his parents’ consent. local authority to apply for an order where the result could be achieved by the making of an order under the Children Act, would Removing a mobile phone: apply. A care order would allow a local Deprivation of liberty? authority to remove a child’s mobile phone Manchester City Council v P (Refusal of or restrict internet use and so the court Restrictions on Mobile Phone) could not grant leave to apply for an High Court Family Division, MacDonald J order. It might be necessary if physical 27 January 2023 [2023] EWHC 133 (Fam) force were required, but in most cases it would not be appropriate to apply for the P was a 16-year-old child who was made the use of the inherent jurisdiction if removal of subject of a full care order and a deprivation http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Adoption & Fostering SAGE

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/northern-ireland-UQ3sduoV9E
Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2023
ISSN
0308-5759
eISSN
1740-469X
DOI
10.1177/03085759231163883a
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

96 Adoption & Fostering 47(1) potential risks to the child were such that Children Act 1989 – the effect of a care the court should take the very unusual step order. of granting a declaration that the child The court found further that section 100, could be given medication immediately which prevents the court giving leave to a after birth without his parents’ consent. local authority to apply for an order where the result could be achieved by the making of an order under the Children Act, would Removing a mobile phone: apply. A care order would allow a local Deprivation of liberty? authority to remove a child’s mobile phone Manchester City Council v P (Refusal of or restrict internet use and so the court Restrictions on Mobile Phone) could not grant leave to apply for an High Court Family Division, MacDonald J order. It might be necessary if physical 27 January 2023 [2023] EWHC 133 (Fam) force were required, but in most cases it would not be appropriate to apply for the P was a 16-year-old child who was made the use of the inherent jurisdiction if removal of subject of a full care order and a deprivation

Journal

Adoption & FosteringSAGE

Published: Mar 1, 2023

There are no references for this article.