Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
The future of developmental theory will only in part be shaped by topical matters. Of greater importance is the changing status of theory in the psychology of development. Recent scholarship has suggested that psychologists can no longer assume that development is synonymous with progress nor that psychologists can pronounce on development `in general'. Such recognitions radically alter the status of what psychologists can say about development, highlighting the central role played by irrationality in developmental thinking. On this ground, I argue that developmentalists must acknowledge the poetic or `mimetic' constitution of their language when dealing with others, whether in theory, research or practice. This acknowledgement suggests that psychologists will need to review both the putative child-centredness of their thinking about development and, more generally, their own subjective orientation to others in research and practice.
Theory & Psychology – SAGE
Published: Nov 1, 1993
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.