Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder are differentially sensitive to interference from previous verbal feedback

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder are differentially sensitive to interference from... This study examined whether set-shifting ability for children with autism spectrum disorder without intellectual disability would be affected differentially by verbal or nonverbal feedback as the outcome of previous research tentatively suggests that verbal feedback may lead to slower set-shifting. Overall, 56 children participated (42 male; 14 female); 28 with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (24 male) and 28 (21 male) typically developing children matched on cognitive and verbal abilities. Each group was exposed to a set-shifting task using cards varying in three dimensions. One group of typically developing children, and one group of autism spectrum disorder children, received verbal feedback on their performance, and one group received nonverbal feedback. Children with autism spectrum disorder learned an initial categorisation rule as fast as matched typically developing children. There was little difference in the impact of the type of feedback on acquisition. However, on shifting the classification rule, children with autism spectrum disorder showed slower rates of learning the new rule, relative to matched controls, which was worse when verbal feedback was used compared to nonverbal feedback. This finding has implications for the interpretations of set-shifting performance and for classroom use of feedback strategies.Lay abstractIndividuals with autism spectrum disorder can find behavioural flexibility challenging, often exhibited in terms of repetitive behaviours or restricted ranges of interests and activities. An inability to shift efficiently from one situation to another is connected with problems in daily life, and identifying factors associated with this ability may help develop teaching strategies to improve behavioural flexibility. Some existing findings imply shifting performance for individuals with autism spectrum disorder is better with nonverbal, compared to verbal, feedback – even for those with strong verbal abilities. Unfortunately, there are few behavioural examinations that further explore these findings, which is the aim of this study. In this study, 28 children with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder and 28 typically developing children matched on cognitive and verbal abilities learned to sort cards according to one out of a possible three dimensions (colour, shape and number), and then had to relearn the sorting rule. One group of typically developing children, and one group of autism spectrum disorder children, received verbal feedback on their performance, and one group received nonverbal feedback. Children with autism spectrum disorder learned an initial categorisation rule as fast as matched typically developing children, and there was little difference in the impact of the type of feedback on acquisition. However, on shifting the classification rule, children with autism spectrum disorder showed slower rates of learning the new rule, which was worse when verbal feedback was used compared to nonverbal feedback. This finding has implications for the interpretations of set-shifting performance and for classroom use of feedback strategies. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice SAGE

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder are differentially sensitive to interference from previous verbal feedback

Download PDF
10 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/individuals-with-autism-spectrum-disorder-are-differentially-sensitive-kSGMfhlyjG
Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2023
ISSN
1362-3613
eISSN
1461-7005
DOI
10.1177/13623613221150377
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study examined whether set-shifting ability for children with autism spectrum disorder without intellectual disability would be affected differentially by verbal or nonverbal feedback as the outcome of previous research tentatively suggests that verbal feedback may lead to slower set-shifting. Overall, 56 children participated (42 male; 14 female); 28 with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (24 male) and 28 (21 male) typically developing children matched on cognitive and verbal abilities. Each group was exposed to a set-shifting task using cards varying in three dimensions. One group of typically developing children, and one group of autism spectrum disorder children, received verbal feedback on their performance, and one group received nonverbal feedback. Children with autism spectrum disorder learned an initial categorisation rule as fast as matched typically developing children. There was little difference in the impact of the type of feedback on acquisition. However, on shifting the classification rule, children with autism spectrum disorder showed slower rates of learning the new rule, relative to matched controls, which was worse when verbal feedback was used compared to nonverbal feedback. This finding has implications for the interpretations of set-shifting performance and for classroom use of feedback strategies.Lay abstractIndividuals with autism spectrum disorder can find behavioural flexibility challenging, often exhibited in terms of repetitive behaviours or restricted ranges of interests and activities. An inability to shift efficiently from one situation to another is connected with problems in daily life, and identifying factors associated with this ability may help develop teaching strategies to improve behavioural flexibility. Some existing findings imply shifting performance for individuals with autism spectrum disorder is better with nonverbal, compared to verbal, feedback – even for those with strong verbal abilities. Unfortunately, there are few behavioural examinations that further explore these findings, which is the aim of this study. In this study, 28 children with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder and 28 typically developing children matched on cognitive and verbal abilities learned to sort cards according to one out of a possible three dimensions (colour, shape and number), and then had to relearn the sorting rule. One group of typically developing children, and one group of autism spectrum disorder children, received verbal feedback on their performance, and one group received nonverbal feedback. Children with autism spectrum disorder learned an initial categorisation rule as fast as matched typically developing children, and there was little difference in the impact of the type of feedback on acquisition. However, on shifting the classification rule, children with autism spectrum disorder showed slower rates of learning the new rule, which was worse when verbal feedback was used compared to nonverbal feedback. This finding has implications for the interpretations of set-shifting performance and for classroom use of feedback strategies.

Journal

Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice – SAGE

Published: Oct 1, 2023

Keywords: autism spectrum disorder; nonverbal feedback; set-shifting; verbal feedback

References

  • The brain correlates of the effects of monetary and verbal rewards on intrinsic motivation
    Albrecht, K.; Abeler, J.; Weber, B.; Falk, A.
  • Effects of type and combination of feedback upon conceptual learning by children: Implications for research in academic learning
    Barringer, C.; Gholson, B.
  • A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking.
    Berg, E. A.
  • Nonverbal, rather than verbal, functioning may predict cognitive flexibility among persons with autism spectrum disorder: A preliminary study
    Campbell, C. A.; Russo, N.; Landry, O.; Jankowska, A. M.; Stubbert, E.; Jacques, S.; Burack, J. A.
  • Common alterations in sensitivity to type but not amount of reward in ADHD and autism spectrum disorders
    Demurie, E.; Roeyers, H.; Baeyens, D.; Sonuga-Barke, E.
  • Neural responses to a putative set-shifting task in children with autism spectrum disorder
    Dirks, B.; Romero, C.; Voorhies, W.; Kupis, L.; Nomi, J. S.; Dajani, D. R.; Odriozola, P.; Burrows, C. A.; Beaumont, A. L.; Cardona, S. M.; Parlade, M. V.; Alessandri, M.; Britton, J. C.; Uddin, L. Q.
  • Reliability and validity of the Pervasive Developmental Disorders Rating Scale and the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale
    Eaves, R. C.; Williams, T. O.; Woods-Groves, S.; Fall, A. M.
  • A preliminary randomized, controlled trial of executive function training for children with autism spectrum disorder
    Faja, S.; Clarkson, T.; Gilbert, R.; Vaidyanathan, A.; Greco, G.; Rueda, M. R.; Combita, L. M.; Driscoll, K.
  • Autism: Beyond ‘theory of mind’
    Frith, U.; Happé, F.
  • Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning
    Frye, D.; Zelazo, P. D.; Palfai, T.
  • Can bilingualism mitigate set-shifting difficulties in children with autism spectrum disorders?
    Gonzalez-Barrero, A. M.; Nadig, A. S.
  • Characterizing the factor structure of parent reported executive function in autism spectrum disorders: The impact of cognitive inflexibility
    Granader, Y.; Wallace, G. L.; Hardy, K. K.; Yerys, B. E.; Lawson, R. A.; Rosenthal, M.; Wills, M. C.; Dixon, E.; Pandey, J.; Penna, R.; Schultz, R. T.; Schultz, R. T.
  • A mini-review of fMRI studies of human medial temporal lobe activity Associated with recognition memory
    Henson, R.
  • Self-ordered pointing in children with autism: Failure to use verbal mediation in the service of working memory?
    Joseph, R. M.; Steele, S. D.; Meyer, E.; Tager-Flusberg, H.
  • Randomized controlled effectiveness trial of executive function intervention for children on the autism spectrum
    Kenworthy, L.; Anthony, L. G.; Naiman, D. Q.; Cannon, L.; Wills, M. C.; Luong-Tran, C.; Werner, M. A.; Alexander, K. C.; Strang, J.; Bal, E.; Sokoloff, J. L.; Wallace, G. L.
  • Adaptive behavior ratings correlate with symptomatology and IQ among individuals with high functioning autism spectrum disorders
    Kenworthy, L.; Case, L.; Harms, M. B.; Martin, A.; Wallace, G. L.
  • Behavior checklist for identifying severely handicapped individuals with high levels of autistic behavior
    Krug, D. A.; Arick, J.; Almond, P.
  • A matter of words: Impact of verbal and nonverbal information on impression formation in high-functioning autism
    Kuzmanovic, B.; Schilbach, L.; Lehnhardt, F. G.; Bente, G.; Vogeley, K.
  • Meta-analysis of neuropsychological measures of executive functioning in children and adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder
    Lai, C. L. E.; Lau, Z.; Lui, S. S. Y.; Lok, E.; Tam, V.; Chan, Q.; Cheng, K. M.; Cheng, K. M.; Siu Man Lam
  • Restricted and repetitive behaviors in autism spectrum disorders: A review of research in the last decade
    Leekam, S. R.; Prior, M. R.; Uljarevic, M.
  • Children’s discrimination learning as a function of reward and punishment
    Penney, R. K.; Lupton, A. A.
  • Behavioural flexibility of children with autism spectrum disorder on a card-sorting task with varying task difficulty
    Reed, P.
  • Disrupted stimulus control but not reward sensitivity in individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A matching law analysis
    Reed, P.; Hawthorn, R.; Bolger, S.; Meredith, K.; Bishop, R.
  • Flexibility in young people with autism spectrum disorders on a card sort task
    Reed, P.; Watts, H.; Truzoli, R.
  • Deconstructing executive deficits among persons with autism: Implications for cognitive neuroscience
    Russo, N.; Flanagan, T.; Iarocci, G.; Berringer, D.; Zelazo, P. D.; Burack, J. A.
  • Reward processing in autism
    Scott-Van Zeeland, A. A.; Dapretto, M.; Ghahremani, D. G.; Poldrack, R. A.; Bookheimer, S. Y
  • Verbal versus nonverbal reinforcement combinations in the discrimination learning of middle-and lower-class children
    Spence, J. T.; Segner, L. L.
  • Discrimination learning in children as a function of motive-incentive conditions
    Stevenson, H. W.; Weir, M. W.; Zigler, E. F.
  • Achieving independence and mastery in school: An open trial in the outpatient setting
    Tamm, L.; Zoromski, A. K.; Kneeskern, E. E.; Patel, M.; Lacey, H. M.; Vaughn, A. J.; Ciesielski, H. A.; Weadick, H. K.; Duncan, A. W.
  • The triple I hypothesis: Taking another (‘s) perspective on executive dysfunction in autism
    White, S. J.
  • Assessing planning and set-shifting abilities in autism: Are experimenter-administered and computerised versions of tasks equivalent?
    Williams, D.; Jarrold, C.
  • Neural correlates of set-shifting in children with autism
    Yerys, B. E.; Antezana, L.; Weinblatt, R.; Jankowski, K. F.; Strang, J.; Vaidya, C. J.; Schultz, R. T.; Gaillard, W. D.; Kenworthy, L.
  • Set-shifting in children with autism spectrum disorders: Reversal shifting deficits on the Intradimensional/Extradimensional Shift Test correlate with repetitive behaviors
    Yerys, B. E.; Wallace, G. L.; Harrison, B.; Celano, M. J.; Giedd, J. N.; Kenworthy, L. E.
  • Brief report: Impaired flexible item selection task (FIST) in school-age children with autism spectrum disorders
    Yerys, B. E.; Wolff, B. C.; Moody, E.; Pennington, B. F.; Hepburn, S. L.
  • The Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS): A method of assessing executive function in children
    Zelazo, P. D.