How to fund the NHS

How to fund the NHS From the Editor Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine; 2018, Vol. 111(6) 187 DOI: 10.1177/0141076818782032 Kamran Abbasi Editor, JRSM The questions about the NHS’s sustainability are authors, it is best achieved by a cross party commis- centred on its financial viability. While there are sion on health and care. many dimensions to this debate, a taxation-based The future success of the NHS will also be deter- system remains under scrutiny. Twenty years ago, a mined by innovation and focusing on value. Mahtani senior economist at the World Bank told me that our et al. believe that the time is right to introduce para- tax-based model was unsustainable. Most health sys- medics in general practice. This month’s research tems were funded by insurance schemes, and it was a paper finds that the cost of ‘low value’ prescribing matter of when, not if, the NHS would follow suit. is rising and is subject to regional variation. We This year, a German policy maker explained to me also need robust research, and some of the world’s that Germany-maintained funding increases in its best in methodology demonstrate the importance of health system during the financial crisis because the allocation concealment and the steps required to min- funding model was diverse; in other words not solely imise it in the design, conduct and reporting of trials. reliant on taxation. Enter Mahiben Maruthappu and Dominic References Marshall to help analyse the various funding options 1. Maruthappu M and Marshall DC. Viable funding for the NHS. Their argument is that there are three options for the National Health Service in England. possible futures for the NHS. First, in the absence of J R Soc Med 2018; 111: 189–194. 2. Mahtani KR, Eaton G, Catterall M and Ridley A. new money, productivity must be stepped up. Setting the scene for paramedics in general practice: Alternatively, public funding might be released for what can we expect? J R Soc Med 2018; 111: 195–198. the NHS by reallocation of funds from other sectors, 3. Walker AJ, Curtis HJ, Bacon S, Croker R and Goldacre by raising national insurance or introducing a B. Trends and variation in prescribing of low-priority hypothecated tax. The third model is privatised med- treatments identified by NHS England: a cross-sectional ical insurance. study and interactive data tool in English primary care. More funding will only arise from political action, J R Soc Med 2018; 111: 203–213. and while this crisis might seem unprecedented, the 4. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Altman DG, Grimes DA, authors remind us that sharp political intervention Moher D and Hayes RJ. ‘Allocation concealment’: the was also required in 1951, 1968, 1976, 1987–1988 evolution and adoption of a methodological term. JR and 1999. Whatever the way forward, say the Soc Med 2018; 111: 216–224. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine SAGE

How to fund the NHS

Free
1 page

Loading next page...
1 Page
 
/lp/sage/how-to-fund-the-nhs-Z4yz95wf2A
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Copyright
© The Royal Society of Medicine
ISSN
0141-0768
eISSN
1758-1095
D.O.I.
10.1177/0141076818782032
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

From the Editor Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine; 2018, Vol. 111(6) 187 DOI: 10.1177/0141076818782032 Kamran Abbasi Editor, JRSM The questions about the NHS’s sustainability are authors, it is best achieved by a cross party commis- centred on its financial viability. While there are sion on health and care. many dimensions to this debate, a taxation-based The future success of the NHS will also be deter- system remains under scrutiny. Twenty years ago, a mined by innovation and focusing on value. Mahtani senior economist at the World Bank told me that our et al. believe that the time is right to introduce para- tax-based model was unsustainable. Most health sys- medics in general practice. This month’s research tems were funded by insurance schemes, and it was a paper finds that the cost of ‘low value’ prescribing matter of when, not if, the NHS would follow suit. is rising and is subject to regional variation. We This year, a German policy maker explained to me also need robust research, and some of the world’s that Germany-maintained funding increases in its best in methodology demonstrate the importance of health system during the financial crisis because the allocation concealment and the steps required to min- funding model was diverse; in other words not solely imise it in the design, conduct and reporting of trials. reliant on taxation. Enter Mahiben Maruthappu and Dominic References Marshall to help analyse the various funding options 1. Maruthappu M and Marshall DC. Viable funding for the NHS. Their argument is that there are three options for the National Health Service in England. possible futures for the NHS. First, in the absence of J R Soc Med 2018; 111: 189–194. 2. Mahtani KR, Eaton G, Catterall M and Ridley A. new money, productivity must be stepped up. Setting the scene for paramedics in general practice: Alternatively, public funding might be released for what can we expect? J R Soc Med 2018; 111: 195–198. the NHS by reallocation of funds from other sectors, 3. Walker AJ, Curtis HJ, Bacon S, Croker R and Goldacre by raising national insurance or introducing a B. Trends and variation in prescribing of low-priority hypothecated tax. The third model is privatised med- treatments identified by NHS England: a cross-sectional ical insurance. study and interactive data tool in English primary care. More funding will only arise from political action, J R Soc Med 2018; 111: 203–213. and while this crisis might seem unprecedented, the 4. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Altman DG, Grimes DA, authors remind us that sharp political intervention Moher D and Hayes RJ. ‘Allocation concealment’: the was also required in 1951, 1968, 1976, 1987–1988 evolution and adoption of a methodological term. JR and 1999. Whatever the way forward, say the Soc Med 2018; 111: 216–224.

Journal

Journal of the Royal Society of MedicineSAGE

Published: Jun 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off