Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Howe, Beulah Durr (1982)
Using concrete materials and peer interaction to enhance learning in chemistryJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 19
E. Talton, Ronald Simpson (1985)
Relationships between peer and individual attitudes toward science among adolescent studentsScience Education, 69
Ronald Simpson, J. Oliver (1990)
A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent studentsScience Education, 74
T. Harvey (1980)
Girls and Physical ScienceJournal of Further and Higher Education, 4
A. Kelly (1988)
Gender differences in teacher–pupil interactions: a meta-analytic reviewResearch in Education, 39
Sandra Johnson (1987)
Gender differences in science: parallels in interest, experience and performanceInternational Journal of Science Education, 9
I. Robertson (1987)
Girls and boys and practical scienceInternational Journal of Science Education, 9
J. Kahle, Marsha Lakes (1983)
The myth of equality in science classroomsJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 20
Ronald Simpson, J. Oliver (1985)
Attitude toward Science and Achievement Motivation Profiles of Male and Female Science Students in Grades Six through Ten.Science Education, 69
M. Ormerod, C. Wood (1983)
A comparative study of three methods of measuring the attitudes to science of 10‐ to 11‐year‐old pupils, 5
P. Gardner (1975)
Attitudes to Science : A ReviewStudies in Science Education, 2
R. Schibeci (1984)
Attitudes to Science: an updateStudies in Science Education, 11
A. Kelly (1986)
The development of girls’ and boys’ attitudes to science: A longitudinal study‡, 8
T. Harvey, P. Edwards (1980)
Children's Expectations and Realisations of Science.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50
P. Tamir (1988)
Gender Differences in High School Science in IsraelBritish Educational Research Journal, 14
A. Kelly (1988)
Sex Stereotypes and School Science: A Three Year Follow-Up.Educational Studies, 14
D. Banu (1986)
Secondary School Students' Attitudes Towards ScienceResearch in Science & Technological Education, 4
D. Levine, A. Ornstein (1983)
Sex Differences in Ability and Achievement.Journal of research and development in education, 16
E. Vockell, Susan Lobonc (1981)
Sex-Role Stereotyping by High School Females in Science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18
B. Smail, A. Kelly (1984)
Sex Differences in Science and Technology Among 11‐year‐old Schoolchildren: II‐‐affectiveResearch in Science & Technological Education, 2
R. Lazarowitz, R. Lazarowitz (1979)
Choices and preferences of science subjects by junior high school students in israelJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 16
J. Keeves (1975)
The home, the school, and achievement in mathematics and scienceScience Education, 59
D. Baker (1987)
The influence of role‐specific self‐concept and sex‐role identity on career choices in scienceJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 24
This paper explores the extent to which variance in science attitudes and involvement in science activities may be attributable to gender, parental and peer influences upon 11-14 year olds in the UK. The data presented are derived from a sample of 391 pupils drawn at random, but stratified by age and gender, from Local Education Authority schools (i.e. schools within the state sector where parents make no direct payments for education). A self-completion questionnaire was administered to the pupils in school. Attitudes toward scientific change, involvement in scientific extra-curricular activity, liking and performance in school science subjects, and participation in peer youth culture were indexed, in addition to estimates of the amount of positive regard for science expressed by peers and parents.Boys had more positive attitudes to science and greater levels of participation in scientific extra-curricular activities. They also reported performing better at school science than girls. A positive attitude to science was strongly positively related to having a father and mother who support science, coming from a lower socio-economic family background, being male, and having scientific peers. Greater involvement in scientific extra-curricular activities was predicted by having a father who supports science, having parents who engage in activities jointly with their children, and having scientific peers.In terms of predicting participation in science, liking of it and success at it, these data lead to the conclusion that both parental and peer support are influential. Though it does seem that they are relatively more important in predicting variance in attitudes to science in society than as indicators of liking of or performance at school science. The problems involved in estimating whether commonly reported gender effects are mediated through peer or parental support are discussed.
Public Understanding of Science – SAGE
Published: Apr 1, 1992
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.