Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Traballesi, A. Delussu, A. Fusco, M. Iosa, T. Averna, R. Pellegrini, S. Brunelli (2012)
Residual limb wounds or ulcers heal in transtibial amputees using an active suction socket system. A randomized controlled study.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 48 4
M. Fenech, M. Jaffrin (2004)
Extracellular and intracellular volume variations during postural change measured by segmental and wrist-ankle bioimpedance spectroscopyIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 51
J. Bao, C. Davis, R. Schmukler (1993)
Impedance spectroscopy of human erythrocytes: system calibration, and nonlinear modelingIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 40
Kenneth Cole, Choh-Luh Li, A. Bak (1969)
Electrical analogues for tissues.Experimental neurology, 24 3
O. Dunn (1964)
Multiple Comparisons Using Rank SumsTechnometrics, 6
J. Sanders, J. Cagle, Katheryn Allyn, D. Harrison, M. Ciol (2014)
How do walking, standing, and resting influence transtibial amputee residual limb fluid volume?Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 51 2
F. Hoaglund, H. Jergesen, L. Wilson, L. Lamoreux, R. Roberts (1983)
Evaluation of problems and needs of veteran lower-limb amputees in the San Francisco Bay Area during the period 1977-1980.Journal of rehabilitation R&D, 20 1
J. Sanders, D. Harrison, Katheryn Allyn, T. Myers, M. Ciol, Elaine Tsai (2012)
How do sock ply changes affect residual-limb fluid volume in people with transtibial amputation?Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 49 2
J. Sanders, T. Hartley, R. Phillips, M. Ciol, B. Hafner, Katheryn Allyn, D. Harrison (2016)
Does temporary socket removal affect residual limb fluid volume of trans-tibial amputees?Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 40
G. Klute, J. Berge, Wayne Biggs, Suporn Pongnumkul, Zoran Popovic, B. Curless (2011)
Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on fit, activity, and limb volume.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 92 10
Morgan Redfield, J. Cagle, B. Hafner, J. Sanders (2013)
Classifying prosthetic use via accelerometry in persons with transtibial amputations.Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 50 9
J. Sanders, S. Zachariah, A. Jacobsen, J. Fergason (2005)
Changes in interface pressures and shear stresses over time on trans-tibial amputee subjects ambulating with prosthetic limbs: comparison of diurnal and six-month differences.Journal of biomechanics, 38 8
J. Sanders, D. Harrison, T. Myers, Katheryn Allyn (2011)
Effects of elevated vacuum on in-socket residual limb fluid volume: case study results using bioimpedance analysis.Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 48 10
V. Nelson, K. Flood, P. Bryant, Mark Huang, P. Pasquina, Toni Roberts (2006)
Limb deficiency and prosthetic management. 1. Decision making in prosthetic prescription and management.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 87 3 Suppl 1
J. Sanders, Robert Youngblood, B. Hafner, M. Ciol, Katheryn Allyn, David Gardner, J. Cagle, C. Redd, Colin Dietrich (2018)
Residual limb fluid volume change and volume accommodation: Relationships to activity and self-report outcomes in people with trans-tibial amputationProsthetics and Orthotics International, 42
J. Sanders, D. Harrison, J. Cagle, T. Myers, M. Ciol, Katheryn Allyn (2012)
Post-doffing residual limb fluid volume change in people with trans-tibial amputationProsthetics and Orthotics International, 36
J. Sanders, S. Fatone (2011)
Residual limb volume change: systematic review of measurement and management.Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 48 8
M. Legro, G. Reiber, M. Aguila, Megan Ajax, D. Boone, J. Larsen, Douglas Smith, B. Sangeorzan (1999)
Issues of importance reported by persons with lower limb amputations and prostheses.Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 36 3
Hoaglund (1983)
Evaluation of problems and needs of veteran lower-limb amputees in the San Francisco Bay Area during the period 1977-1980J Rehabil Res Dev, 20
J. Sanders, M. Moehring, Travis Rothlisberger, R. Phillips, T. Hartley, Colin Dietrich, C. Redd, David Gardner, J. Cagle (2016)
A Bioimpedance Analysis Platform for Amputee Residual Limb AssessmentIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 63
A. Lorenzo, A. Andreoli, J. Matthie, And Withers, De Lorenzo, P. With (1997)
Predicting body cell mass with bioimpedance by using theoretical methods: a technological review.Journal of applied physiology, 82 5
Wayne Board, Glenn Street, C. Caspers (2001)
A comparison of trans-tibial amputee suction and vacuum socket conditionsProsthetics and Orthotics International, 25
H. Gholizadeh, H. Gholizadeh, Edward Lemaire, Edward Lemaire, A. Eshraghi (2016)
The evidence-base for elevated vacuum in lower limb prosthetics: Literature review and professional feedback.Clinical biomechanics, 37
J. Goswami, R. Lynn, Glenn Street, M. Harlander (2003)
Walking in a vacuumassisted socket shifts the stump fluid balanceProsthetics and Orthotics International, 27
J. Sanders, J. Cagle, D. Harrison, T. Myers, Kate Allyn (2013)
How does adding and removing liquid from socket bladders affect residual-limb fluid volume?Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 50 6
Background:The volume of a prosthesis user’s residual limb changes during the day and may affect the fit of the prosthesis. These changes must be managed by the user to prevent discomfort, skin breakdown, and falls.Objectives:The objectives were to test how activity, time of day, and intermittent doffing affected residual limb fluid volume in people with transtibial amputation.Study design:Standardized, repeated measure (A-B-A) out-of-laboratory protocol.Methods:Participants with transtibial amputation completed three 6-h test sessions. Two sessions served as controls (A protocol) during which participants left their prosthesis donned, and one session was an intervention (B protocol) where participants doffed their prosthesis twice for 20 min during the 6 h of testing. Within-socket fluid volume was measured using a custom portable bioimpedance analysis system.Results:A total of 13 participants completed the study. The rate of limb fluid volume loss was higher early in the session compared with late in the session. Participants experienced less fluid volume loss during high activity than low activity. Socket users with pin suspension experienced less posterior fluid volume loss when they intermittently doffed their prosthesis. Intermittent doffing did not benefit limb fluid volume of mechanical vacuum and suction suspension users.Conclusion:High activity may reduce fluid volume loss compared with low activity. Intermittent doffing may provide volume accommodation for transtibial prosthesis users with pin suspension.Clinical relevanceProsthetists should query their patients about the intensity of activity they conduct when advising them on limb volume management. Patients using sockets with pin suspension may be able to offset limb fluid volume loss by periodically doffing the prosthesis.
Prosthetics and Orthotics International – SAGE
Published: Feb 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.