Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/sage/corporate-social-responsibility-orientation-goals-and-behavior-sm2SLPRQZY
References (46)
-
P. Stanwick, Sarah Stanwick (1998)
The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance, and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical ExaminationJournal of Business Ethics, 17
-
S. Vyakarnam, Adam Bailey, A. Myers, D. Burnett (1997)
Towards an Understanding of Ethical Behaviour in Small FirmsJournal of Business Ethics, 16
-
(2001)
Ethics of business managers vs. entrepreneurs -
Nigel Sarbutts (2003)
Can SMEs “do” CSR? A practitioner’s view of the ways small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises are able to manage reputation through corporate social responsibilityJournal of Communication Management, 7
-
Have CEOs of large U.S. firms changed their CSR orientations during the Reagan presidency? -
B. Burton, Harvey Hegarty (1999)
Some Determinants of Student Corporate Social Responsibility OrientationBusiness & Society, 38
-
Maria Fernandes, D. Randall (1992)
The Nature of Social Desirability Response Effects in Ethics ResearchBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 2
-
D. Randall, Maria Fernandes (1990)
The social desirability response bias in ethics researchJournal of Business Ethics, 10
-
I. Ajzen (2001)
Nature and operation of attitudes.Annual review of psychology, 52
-
S. Wartick, Philip Cochran (1985)
The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance ModelAcademy of Management Review, 10
-
(1991)
A small firm planning survey: Business goals, social responsibility, and financial performance -
James Chrisman, Richard Archer (1984)
Small Business Social Responsibility: Some Perceptions and InsightsEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 9
-
R. Klassen (2009)
PLANT‐LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ORIENTATION: THE INFLUENCE OF MANAGEMENT VIEWS AND PLANT CHARACTERISTICSProduction and Operations Management, 10
-
Nabil Ibrahim, Donald Howard, John Angelidis (2003)
Board Members in the Service Industry: An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation and Directorial TypeJournal of Business Ethics, 47
-
T. Pinkston, A. Carroll (1994)
Corporate citizenship perspectives and foreign direct investment in the U.S.Journal of Business Ethics, 13
-
Nabil Ibrahim, John Angelidis, Donald Howard (2000)
The corporate social responsiveness orientation of hospital directors: does occupational background make a difference?Health care management review, 25 2
-
Joachim Marz, T. Powers, Thomas Queisser (2003)
Corporate and Individual Influences on Managers' Social OrientationJournal of Business Ethics, 46
-
V. Edmondson, A. Carroll (1999)
Giving Back: An Examination of the Philanthropic Motivations, Orientations and Activities of Large Black-Owned BusinessesJournal of Business Ethics, 19
-
Kenneth Aupperle, A. Carroll, J. Hatfield (1985)
An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate so#al responsibility and profitabilit -
Heather Albinger, S. Freeman (2000)
Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking PopulationsJournal of Business Ethics, 28
-
Bradley Agle, Ronald Mitchell, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld (1999)
Who Matters to Ceos? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corpate Performance, and Ceo ValuesAcademy of Management Journal, 42
-
(2004)
Entrepreneurship: Theory, process, and practice (6th ed.).Cincinnati, OH: South-Western -
J. Thompson, H. Smith (1991)
Social Responsibility and Small Business: Suggestions for ResearchJournal of Small Business Management, 29
-
S. Waddock, Samuel Graves (1997)
The corporate social performance-financial performance linkStrategic Management Journal, 18
-
W. Smith, Richard Wokutch, Vernard Harrington, Bryan Dennis (2004)
Organizational Attractiveness and Corporate Social Orientation: Do Our Values Influence Our Preference for Affirmative Action and Managing Diversity?Business & Society, 43
-
Francis Hannafey (2003)
Entrepreneurship and Ethics: A Literature ReviewJournal of Business Ethics, 46
-
M. Schwartz (1998)
Research on Corporate Social Responsibility Orientations: A Critique and Future Directions, 9
-
Frederic Pryor (2010)
Capitalism and freedomEconomic Systems, 34
-
(1980)
Social responsibility of business: What are the small business perspectives -
G. Auld, Steven Bernstein, B. Cashore (2008)
The New Corporate Social ResponsibilityAnnual Review of Environment and Resources, 33
-
K. Davis (1973)
The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social ResponsibilitiesAcademy of Management Journal, 16
-
(1982)
Public versus business expectations: Two views on social responsibility for small business -
B. Burton, J. Farh, W. Hegarty (2007)
A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation: Hong Kong vs. United States StudentsTeaching Business Ethics, 4
-
Hugh O'neill, C. Saunders, A. McCarthy (1989)
Board members, corporate social responsiveness and profitability: Are tradeoffs necessary?Journal of Business Ethics, 8
-
Nabil Ibrahim, John Angelidis (1995)
The corporate social responsiveness orientation of board members: Are there differences between inside and outside directors?Journal of Business Ethics, 14
-
B. Burton, Michael Goldsby (2004)
Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation of Small Business Owners: A Study, 15
-
Kenneth Aupperle (1982)
An empirical inquiry into the social responsibilities as defined by corporations : an examination of various models and relationships -
N. Hing (2001)
Changing the Odds: A Study of Corporate Social Principles and Practices in Addressing Problem GamblingJournal of Business Ethics, 33
-
A. Carroll (1979)
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate PerformanceAcademy of Management Review, 4
-
Ronald Mitchell, Bradley Agle, D. Wood (1997)
Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really CountsAcademy of Management Review, 22
-
T. Besser, Nancy Miller (2001)
Is the good corporation dead? the community social responsibility of small business operatorsJournal of Socio-economics, 30
-
D. Wood (1991)
Corporate Social Performance RevisitedAcademy of Management Review, 16
-
(1994)
Organizational size and corporate social responsibility attitudes and behaviors: A preliminary study -
W. Acar, Kenneth Aupperle, R. Lowy (2001)
AN EMPIRICAL EXPLORATION OF MEASURES OF SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ACROSS THE SPECTRUM OF ORGANIZATIONAL TYPESInternational Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9
-
T. Besser, Nancy Miller (2004)
The Risks of Enlightened Self-Interest: Small Businesses and Support for CommunityBusiness & Society, 43
-
Dane Peterson (2004)
The Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational CommitmentBusiness & Society, 43
- Publisher
- SAGE
- Copyright
- Copyright © by SAGE Publications
- ISSN
- 0007-6503
- eISSN
- 1552-4205
- DOI
- 10.1177/0007650307305367
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Corporate social responsibility orientation (CSRO) remains an important topic of researchers. However, one aspect of CSRO that has not been well researched is how it relates to behaviors and goals of managers. In this article, the authors explore that relationship, testing whether emphasis on a particular domain of social responsibility affects time spent dealing with specific stakeholder groups and whether firm size affects that relationship. Results from a survey of small business owners indicate that the emphasis a manager places on a domain does affect behavior and that firm size has little impact on this relationship. Implications of these findings are discussed.
Journal
Business & Society: Founded at Roosevelt University – SAGE
Published: Mar 1, 2009