Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
American Planning Association, Chicago
Elements of a Complete Streets Policy
Philadelphia Complete Streets Design Handbook. Mayor's Office of Transportation and Utilities, City of Philadelphia
Complete Streets Promote Good Health
(2014)
Evaluating Complete Streets
(2014)
Evaluating Complete Streets. Victoria Transport Policy Institute
Shi Shu, David Quiros, Rui Wang, Yifang Zhu (2014)
Changes of street use and on-road air quality before and after complete street retrofit: An exploratory case study in Santa Monica, CaliforniaTransportation Research Part D-transport and Environment, 32
(2014)
Best Complete Streets Policies of
Marc Schlossberg, J. Rowell, D. Amos, Kelly Sanford (2013)
Rethinking Streets: An Evidence-Based Guide to 25 Complete Street Transformations
An Order Establishing a Complete Streets Policy for the City of Memphis
Smart Growth America, Washington
The Standing Committee on Public Transportation Planning and Development peer-reviewed this paper
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority and Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission
Peter Annand (2002)
DESIGN GUIDELINES
The concept that streets should be designed for all applicable transportation modes is commonly known as “complete streets.” Many organizations, including cities, counties, regional authorities, and state agencies, have adopted programs encouraging this approach to street design. These programs almost universally consider the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians. However, it is not understood how well transit vehicles and riders are incorporated into these programs. In this study, complete streets programs of different types from different levels of government across the United States were compared on the basis of a consistent, objective set of criteria. These criteria included transit as a roadway user, guidance for running ways and for transit stops, and transit-related performance measures. Each criterion was worth between 1 and 3 points; the total score for each program was between 1 and 12 points. Only 12 programs earned at least 1 point for each criterion, and only 13 programs earned a cumulative score of 8 or greater. Potential relationships between these transit complete streets scores and population, location, and overall complete streets scores were explored, but no meaningful relationships were found; this result indicates that poor representation of transit is a widespread problem not limited to certain groups. This research revealed a dramatic gap in complete streets programs with regard to transit and calls for future attention and guidance of agencies adopting complete streets programs.
Transportation Research Record – SAGE
Published: Jan 1, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.