Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/sage/common-method-bias-in-regression-models-with-linear-quadratic-and-XM3NfWhxo5
References (25)
-
M. Evans (1985)
A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysisOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36
-
R. Mauro (1990)
Understanding L.O.V.E. (left out variables error): A method for estimating the effects of omitted variables.Psychological Bulletin, 108
-
L. Williams, B. Brown (1994)
Method Variance in Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Research: Effects on Correlations, Path Coefficients, and Hypothesis TestingOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57
-
W. Greene, 张 成思 (2009)
计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis -
L. James (1980)
The unmeasured variables problem in path analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 65
-
D. Campbell, D. Fiske (1959)
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological bulletin, 56 2
-
L. Williams, S. Anderson (1994)
An Alternative Approach to Method Effects by Using Latent-Variable Models: Applications in Organizational Behavior ResearchJournal of Applied Psychology, 79
-
H. Theil (1957)
Specification Errors and the Estimation of Economic Relationships, 25
-
M. Lindell, D. Whitney (2001)
Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs.The Journal of applied psychology, 86 1
-
S. Crampton, J. Wagner (1994)
Percept-Percept Inflation in Microorganizational Research: An Investigation of Prevalence and EffectJournal of Applied Psychology, 79
-
Paul Spector, M. Brannick (1995)
The nature and effects of method variance in organizational research, 10
-
Paul Spector (2006)
Method Variance in Organizational ResearchOrganizational Research Methods, 9
-
Steven Garber, Steven Klepper (1980)
EXTENDING THE CLASSICAL NORMAL ERRORS-IN-VARIABLES MODELEconometrica, 48
-
D. Munz, Timothy Huelsman, Timothy Konold, J. McKinney (1996)
Are there methodological and substantive roles for affectivity in job diagnostic survey relationshipsJournal of Applied Psychology, 81
-
D. Doty, William Glick (1998)
Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results?Organizational Research Methods, 1
-
Marno Verbeek (2000)
A Guide to Modern Econometrics -
J. Busemeyer, L. Jones (1983)
Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error.Psychological Bulletin, 93
-
Joseph Cote, M. Buckley (1988)
Measurement Error and Theory Testing in Consumer Research: An Illustration of the Importance of Construct ValidationJournal of Consumer Research, 14
-
L. Williams, Joseph Cote, M. Buckley (1989)
Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact?Journal of Applied Psychology, 74
-
G. Bohrnstedt, A. Goldberger (1969)
On the Exact Covariance of Products of Random VariablesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 64
-
Paul Spector, M. Brannick (2009)
Common method variance or measurement bias? The problem and possible solutions -
Joseph Rentz (1987)
Generalizability Theory: A Comprehensive Method for Assessing and Improving the Dependability of Marketing MeasuresJournal of Marketing Research, 24
-
P. Podsakoff, Scott MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon Lee, Nathan Podsakoff (2003)
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.The Journal of applied psychology, 88 5
-
Joseph Cote, M. Buckley (1987)
Estimating Trait, Method, and Error Variance: Generalizing across 70 Construct Validation StudiesJournal of Marketing Research, 24
-
L. Williams, J. Edwards, R. Vandenberg (2003)
Recent Advances in Causal Modeling Methods for Organizational and Management ResearchJournal of Management, 29
- Publisher
- SAGE
- Copyright
- © The Author(s) 2010
- ISSN
- 1094-4281
- eISSN
- 1552-7425
- DOI
- 10.1177/1094428109351241
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This research analyzes the effects of common method variance (CMV) on parameter estimates in bivariate linear, multivariate linear, quadratic, and interaction regression models. The authors demonstrate that CMV can either inflate or deflate bivariate linear relationships, depending on the degree of symmetry with which CMV affects the observed measures. With respect to multivariate linear relationships, they show that common method bias generally decreases when additional independent variables suffering from CMV are included in a regression equation. Finally, they demonstrate that quadratic and interaction effects cannot be artifacts of CMV. On the contrary, both quadratic and interaction terms can be severely deflated through CMV, making them more difficult to detect through statistical means.
Journal
Organizational Research Methods – SAGE
Published: Jul 1, 2010