Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Cannabis Dependence and Peer Selection in Social Networks of Frequent Users

Cannabis Dependence and Peer Selection in Social Networks of Frequent Users In a Dutch longitudinal study on the dynamics of cannabis dependence, at baseline 600 frequent cannabis users (? 3 days cannabis use per week in past 12 months) aged 18–30 years were interviewed. Nearly half of all participants (42%) met DSM-IV criteria for cannabis dependence in the 12 months prior to the interview. Participants were recruited by respondent-driven sampling; referrals were understood as proxy for social networks to explore peer associations and social exclusion. Analyses revealed that networks of frequent cannabis users were mostly heterogeneous. Cannabis dependence did not emerge as a main selector. However, within segments of networks some clustering of cannabis dependence (indicating differential inclusion), sex and ethnicity was found. Methodological questions are discussed regarding the applicability of respondent-driven sampling in noninjecting, nonmarginalized drug users. The study's limitations are noted. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Contemporary Drug Problems SAGE

Cannabis Dependence and Peer Selection in Social Networks of Frequent Users

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/cannabis-dependence-and-peer-selection-in-social-networks-of-frequent-wmAUyieSCt

References (38)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 2011 SAGE Publications
ISSN
0091-4509
eISSN
2163-1808
DOI
10.1177/009145091103800105
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In a Dutch longitudinal study on the dynamics of cannabis dependence, at baseline 600 frequent cannabis users (? 3 days cannabis use per week in past 12 months) aged 18–30 years were interviewed. Nearly half of all participants (42%) met DSM-IV criteria for cannabis dependence in the 12 months prior to the interview. Participants were recruited by respondent-driven sampling; referrals were understood as proxy for social networks to explore peer associations and social exclusion. Analyses revealed that networks of frequent cannabis users were mostly heterogeneous. Cannabis dependence did not emerge as a main selector. However, within segments of networks some clustering of cannabis dependence (indicating differential inclusion), sex and ethnicity was found. Methodological questions are discussed regarding the applicability of respondent-driven sampling in noninjecting, nonmarginalized drug users. The study's limitations are noted.

Journal

Contemporary Drug ProblemsSAGE

Published: Mar 1, 2011

There are no references for this article.