Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Heckathorn (1997)
Respondent-driven sampling : A new approach to the study of hidden populationsSocial Problems, 44
Charles Kaplan, D. Korf, C. Sterk (1987)
Temporal and Social Contexts of Heroin‐Using Populations An Illustration of the Snowball Sampling TechniqueThe Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175
G. Avanesov (1982)
The Principles of Criminology
D. Korf (1995)
Dutch treat: formal control and illicit drug use in the Netherlands.
(1950)
Unravelling juvenile delinquency
B. Werble (1966)
Outsiders Studies in the Sociology of Deviance.Archives of General Psychiatry, 15
(2005)
Sessions, cyphers, and parties: Settings for informal social controls of blunt smoking
D. Abramovitz, E. Volz, S. Strathdee, T. Patterson, A. Vera, S. Frost (2009)
Using Respondent-Driven Sampling in a Hidden Population at Risk of HIV Infection: Who Do HIV-Positive Recruiters Recruit?Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 36
Jichuan Wang, R. Carlson, R. Falck, H. Siegal, A. Rahman, Linna Li (2005)
Respondent-driven sampling to recruit MDMA users: a methodological assessment.Drug and alcohol dependence, 78 2
D. Heckathorn, Joan Jeffri (2001)
Finding the beat: Using respondent-driven sampling to study jazz musicians☆Poetics, 28
A. Perkonigg, R. Goodwin, Agnes Fiedler, S. Behrendt, K. Beesdo, R. Lieb, H. Wittchen (2008)
The natural course of cannabis use, abuse and dependence during the first decades of life.Addiction, 103 3
A. Weil (1984)
Drug, Set, and Setting: The Basis for Controlled Intoxicant UseJournal of Psychoactive Drugs, 16
R. Noack, Michael Höfle, R. Gründler, A. Becker, R. Schulz, Katja Paul (2009)
Konsummuster als Kovariablen von DSM-IV CannabisabhängigkeitSuchttherapie, 55
D. Heckathorn (2002)
Respondent-driven sampling II: deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hi
N. Timasheff, E. Sutherland, D. Cressey (1947)
Principles of Criminology.American Sociological Review, 12
J. Boden, D. Fergusson, L. Horwood (2006)
Illicit drug use and dependence in a New Zealand birth cohort.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 40 2
(2002)
NetDraw: Graph visualization software
R. Burt, H. Hagan, K. Sabin, H. Thiede (2010)
Evaluating respondent-driven sampling in a major metropolitan area: Comparing injection drug users in the 2005 Seattle area national HIV behavioral surveillance system survey with participants in the RAVEN and Kiwi studies.Annals of epidemiology, 20 2
H. Vervaeke, L. Deursen, D. Korf (2008)
The Role of Peers in the Initiation and Continuation of Ecstasy UseSubstance Use & Misuse, 43
Matthew Salganik, D. Heckathorn (2004)
5. Sampling and Estimation in Hidden Populations Using Respondent-Driven SamplingSociological Methodology, 34
M. Wouters, D. Korf (2009)
Access to Licensed Cannabis Supply and the Separation of Markets Policy in the NetherlandsJournal of Drug Issues, 39
E. Furlong (2008)
Drugs in Society: European PerspectivesBritish Journal of Psychiatry, 193
A. Benschop, L. Harrison, D. Korf, P. Erickson (2006)
Different Concepts of Ethnicity in a Cross-Atlantic Study of Violence and Drug Use among Deviant YouthEuropean Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 12
D. Heckathorn, R. Broadhead, D. Anthony, D. Weakliem (1999)
AIDS AND SOCIAL NETWORKS: HIV PREVENTION THROUGH NETWORK MOBILIZATION*Sociological focus, 32
S. Sznitman, B. Olsson, R. Room (2008)
A Cannabis Reader: Global Issues and Local Experiences, Perspectives on Cannabis Controversies, Treatment and Regulation in Europe
Wantanee Wattana, F. Griensven, O. Rhucharoenpornpanich, C. Manopaiboon, Warunee Thienkrua, Rattana Bannatham, K. Fox, P. Mock, J. Tappero, W. Levine (2007)
Respondent-driven sampling to assess characteristics and estimate the number of injection drug users in Bangkok, Thailand.Drug and alcohol dependence, 90 2-3
S. Reisner, M. Mimiaga, Carey Johnson, Sean Bland, P. Case, S. Safren, K. Mayer (2010)
What Makes a Respondent-Driven Sampling “Seed” Productive? Example of Finding At-Risk Massachusetts Men Who Have Sex with MenJournal of Urban Health, 87
Richard Kerckhoff, H. Becker (1964)
Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance.Social Forces, 42
P. James (2008)
Drugs in Society: European PerspectivesJournal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 15
F. Weerman, C. Bijleveld, M.D.E. Averdijk (2005)
Netwerken en netwerkposities van delinquente en niet-delinquente jongeren
J. Watters, P. Biernacki (1989)
TARGETED SAMPLING: OPTIONS FOR THE STUDY OF HIDDEN POPULATIONSSocial Problems, 36
L. Kraus, Rita Augustin, B. Orth (2005)
Illegale Drogen, Einstiegsalter und Trends. Ergebnisse des Epidemiologischen Suchtsurvey 2003Suchttherapie, 51
G. Rand (1983)
Quantitative Applications in the Social SciencesJournal of the Operational Research Society, 34
J. Simpson, R. Akers (2000)
Social Learning and Social Structure: A General Theory of Crime and Deviance.Social Forces, 78
C. Reinarman, P. Cohen (2007)
Lineaments of Cannabis Culture: Rules Regulating Use in Amsterdam and San FranciscoContemporary Justice Review, 10
E. Goode (1972)
Drugs in American Society
A. Uusküla, L. Johnston, M. Raag, A. Trummal, A. Talu, D. Jarlais (2010)
Evaluating Recruitment among Female Sex Workers and Injecting Drug Users at Risk for HIV Using Respondent-driven Sampling in EstoniaJournal of Urban Health, 87
(2010)
Methods and objectives of the Dutch Cannabis Dependence Study (CanDep) on the course of frequent cannabis use and dependence
In a Dutch longitudinal study on the dynamics of cannabis dependence, at baseline 600 frequent cannabis users (? 3 days cannabis use per week in past 12 months) aged 18–30 years were interviewed. Nearly half of all participants (42%) met DSM-IV criteria for cannabis dependence in the 12 months prior to the interview. Participants were recruited by respondent-driven sampling; referrals were understood as proxy for social networks to explore peer associations and social exclusion. Analyses revealed that networks of frequent cannabis users were mostly heterogeneous. Cannabis dependence did not emerge as a main selector. However, within segments of networks some clustering of cannabis dependence (indicating differential inclusion), sex and ethnicity was found. Methodological questions are discussed regarding the applicability of respondent-driven sampling in noninjecting, nonmarginalized drug users. The study's limitations are noted.
Contemporary Drug Problems – SAGE
Published: Mar 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.