Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Book Review: Karl Barth: A Guide for the Perplexed

Book Review: Karl Barth: A Guide for the Perplexed ATR/101.2 374 Anglican Theological Review to acknowledge broader issues other than those raised by ARCIC. What of Apostolicae Curae, which declared Anglican orders null and void? What about the role of the ordination of women as a church-dividing issue? Nei- ther are mentioned at all, and while to be sure these issues are outside of the scope of the study, nonetheless were primacy to be resolved tomorrow, these and other issues would remain church-dividing matters between Anglicans and Catholics—and this needs at least to be acknowledged. A second area would be incorporation of additional perspectives, for instance, the under- standings of primacy from Catholic-Orthodox dialogue, a noting that the Gift of Authority has been critiqued by Anglicans as not representing a consensus within worldwide Anglicanism, and an account of the depth of opposition in significant portions of the Catholic Church to the suggestions proposed by these dialogues and to the reassessment of understandings of primacy the author proposes. The Roman Catholic Church, for instance, through the Congregation on the Doctrine of the Faith insisted on a number of correc- tions, changes, and clarifications to ARCIC I and ARCIC II statements, to the point where one formal Anglican response wondered http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Anglican Theological Review SAGE

Book Review: Karl Barth: A Guide for the Perplexed

Slade, Kara N.
Anglican Theological Review , Volume 101 (2): 1 – Aug 25, 2021
Download PDF
3 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/book-review-karl-barth-a-guide-for-the-perplexed-KyHItEX5c7

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 2019 Anglican Theological Review Corporation
ISSN
0003-3286
eISSN
2163-6214
DOI
10.1177/000332861910100233
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

ATR/101.2 374 Anglican Theological Review to acknowledge broader issues other than those raised by ARCIC. What of Apostolicae Curae, which declared Anglican orders null and void? What about the role of the ordination of women as a church-dividing issue? Nei- ther are mentioned at all, and while to be sure these issues are outside of the scope of the study, nonetheless were primacy to be resolved tomorrow, these and other issues would remain church-dividing matters between Anglicans and Catholics—and this needs at least to be acknowledged. A second area would be incorporation of additional perspectives, for instance, the under- standings of primacy from Catholic-Orthodox dialogue, a noting that the Gift of Authority has been critiqued by Anglicans as not representing a consensus within worldwide Anglicanism, and an account of the depth of opposition in significant portions of the Catholic Church to the suggestions proposed by these dialogues and to the reassessment of understandings of primacy the author proposes. The Roman Catholic Church, for instance, through the Congregation on the Doctrine of the Faith insisted on a number of correc- tions, changes, and clarifications to ARCIC I and ARCIC II statements, to the point where one formal Anglican response wondered

Journal

Anglican Theological Review – SAGE

Published: Aug 25, 2021

There are no references for this article.