Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Sternheimer (1952)
Density Effect for the Ionization Loss in Various MaterialsPhysical Review, 88
J. Zsula, A. Liuzzi, J. Laughlin (1957)
Oxidation of ferrous sulfate by high-energy electrons and the influence of the polarization effect.Radiation research, 6 6
W. Armstrong, B. Black, D. Grant (1960)
THE RADIOLYSIS OF AQUEOUS CALCIUM BENZOATE AND BENZOIC ACID SOLUTIONS1The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 64
M. Danzker, N. Kessaris, J. Laughlin (1959)
Absorbed dose and linear energy transfer in radiation experiments.Radiology, 72 1
W. Sinclair, J. Laughlin, H. Rossi, M. Ter-pogossian, W. Moos (1958)
Intercomparison of x-ray exposure dose using Victoreen dose meters at various energies, particularly 22 Mevp.Radiology, 70 5
J. Laughlin, J. Ovadia, J. Beattie, W. Henderson, R. Harvey, L. Haas (1953)
Some physical aspects of electron beam therapy.Radiology, 60 2
Calibration of the Absorbed Dose Produced in Water by Betatron Electrons with the Benzoic-Acid Dosimeter 1 Nathaniel F. Barr , Ph.D. , Mary B. Stark , B.S. and John S. Laughlin , Ph.D. Massachusetts General Hospital Boston 14, Mass. Excerpt Monitoring of betatron electron beams used for therapy in the United States during the past decade has most frequently been done with a transmission ionization chamber, the output of which is calibrated periodically in terms of the reading of a Victoreen ionization chamber surrounded by sufficient additional plastic material to obtain the maximum response (1, 2). These monitor measurements may be converted to absorbed dose by calculation (3) or by calibration with the absorbed dose calorimeter (4). This conversion is more conveniently accomplished through the use of a suitable chemical dosimeter. Such an approach is also more direct than the use of calculated conversion factors, which necessarily involve major assumptions. In the experiments to be described here the benzoic-acid dosimeter has been used to determine the absorbed dose rate produced by betatron electrons at the depth of relative maximum dose in water. These measurements have been related to the conventional and arbitrary specification of betatron electron exposure in terms of the reading of a Victoreen thimble chamber inserted in a polystyrene block. Chemical yield and Victoreen chamber readings have been obtained for all field sizes and energies (6 to 20 Mev) used in therapeutic applications of the betatron electron beam. Replicate determinations of energy absorbed with the Fricke ferrous sulfate dosimeter for all combinations of field sizes and energies would be very time-consuming at therapeutic dose rates. Achemical dosimeter in which benzoic acid is oxidized to salicylic acid is at least ten times more sensitive than the Fricke dosimeter (5), and its use permits considerable saving of time. Since the absolute yield of this dosimeter for electrons is not known, it was calibrated in terms of the Fricke dosimeter for 10- and 20-Mev electrons, on the basis of 15.5 ferricions per 100 e.v. absorbed for the absolute yield of the Fricke dosimeter. The Fricke dosimeter solution was irradiated in the identical geometry, as described below, and in the same containers as the benzoic acid dosimeter. The irradiation field size was 6 × 8 cm. for both 10- and 20-Mev electrons. The ferrous sulfate solutions were irradiated to 5,200 rads and the benzoic acid solutions to 250 rads. The irradiations were monitored by a special transmission ionization chamber and integrating circuit of very good reproducibility (2). Three samples of each chemical dosimeter were irradiated, in alternating sequence, at each energy. A direct calorimetric determination of this yield for a variety of electron energies is now in progress in our laboratory. Experimental Twice recrystallized reagent grade benzoic acid was used throughout. The dosimeter solution consisted of an aqueous solution 1 millimolar in benzoic acid and 10 millimolar in sodium hydroxide. A large cylindrical tank of water 20 cm. deep and 15 cm. in diameter was irradiated.
Radiology – Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
Published: Apr 1, 1962
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.