Clinical practice group performance on quality measures associated with chronic disease management has become central to reimbursement. Therefore, it is important to determine whether commonly used process and disease control measures for chronic conditions correlate with utilization-based outcomes, as they do in acute disease.
Stone (2014)
2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.J Am Coll Cardiol, 63
(PetersonED, RoeMT, MulgundJ, Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2006;295(16):1912-1920. doi:10.1001/jama.295.16.1912 16639050)
PetersonED, RoeMT, MulgundJ, Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2006;295(16):1912-1920. doi:10.1001/jama.295.16.1912 16639050PetersonED, RoeMT, MulgundJ, Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2006;295(16):1912-1920. doi:10.1001/jama.295.16.1912 16639050, PetersonED, RoeMT, MulgundJ, Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2006;295(16):1912-1920. doi:10.1001/jama.295.16.1912 16639050
(National Quality Forum. MAP 2018 Considerations for implementing measures in federal programs: MIPS and MSSP. https://www.qualityforum.org/Projects/im/MAP/Clinician.../2018_Final_Report.aspx. Published March 15, 2018. Accessed June 20, 2018.)
National Quality Forum. MAP 2018 Considerations for implementing measures in federal programs: MIPS and MSSP. https://www.qualityforum.org/Projects/im/MAP/Clinician.../2018_Final_Report.aspx. Published March 15, 2018. Accessed June 20, 2018.National Quality Forum. MAP 2018 Considerations for implementing measures in federal programs: MIPS and MSSP. https://www.qualityforum.org/Projects/im/MAP/Clinician.../2018_Final_Report.aspx. Published March 15, 2018. Accessed June 20, 2018., National Quality Forum. MAP 2018 Considerations for implementing measures in federal programs: MIPS and MSSP. https://www.qualityforum.org/Projects/im/MAP/Clinician.../2018_Final_Report.aspx. Published March 15, 2018. Accessed June 20, 2018.
Eric Peterson, M. Roe, Jyotsna Mulgund, Elizabeth Delong, B. Lytle, R. Brindis, Sidney Smith, Charles Pollack, Ma Newby, Robert Harrington, W. Gibler, E. Ohman, Ohman, Mss Mulgund, Lytle Kaiser-Permanente, Health System, San Francisco, Philadelphia Pennsylvania, Eric Corresponding, Peterson (2006)
Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes.JAMA, 295 16
(US Census Bureau. American Community Survey (ACS). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/. Revised June 17, 2018. Accessed March 28, 2018.)
US Census Bureau. American Community Survey (ACS). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/. Revised June 17, 2018. Accessed March 28, 2018.US Census Bureau. American Community Survey (ACS). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/. Revised June 17, 2018. Accessed March 28, 2018., US Census Bureau. American Community Survey (ACS). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/. Revised June 17, 2018. Accessed March 28, 2018.
(Lo-CiganicW, ZgiborJC, RuppertK, ArenaVC, StoneRA Identifying type 1 and type 2 diabetic cases using administrative data: a tree-structured model. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(3):486-493. doi:10.1177/193229681100500303 21722564)
Lo-CiganicW, ZgiborJC, RuppertK, ArenaVC, StoneRA Identifying type 1 and type 2 diabetic cases using administrative data: a tree-structured model. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(3):486-493. doi:10.1177/193229681100500303 21722564Lo-CiganicW, ZgiborJC, RuppertK, ArenaVC, StoneRA Identifying type 1 and type 2 diabetic cases using administrative data: a tree-structured model. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(3):486-493. doi:10.1177/193229681100500303 21722564, Lo-CiganicW, ZgiborJC, RuppertK, ArenaVC, StoneRA Identifying type 1 and type 2 diabetic cases using administrative data: a tree-structured model. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(3):486-493. doi:10.1177/193229681100500303 21722564
(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Quality payment program: MIPS overview. https://qpp.cms.gov/mips/overview. Accessed July 9, 2019.)
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Quality payment program: MIPS overview. https://qpp.cms.gov/mips/overview. Accessed July 9, 2019.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Quality payment program: MIPS overview. https://qpp.cms.gov/mips/overview. Accessed July 9, 2019., Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Quality payment program: MIPS overview. https://qpp.cms.gov/mips/overview. Accessed July 9, 2019.
(Rural Health Research Center. Rural-urban commuting area codes (RUCAs) http://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/ruca-about.php. Accessed July 9, 2019.)
Rural Health Research Center. Rural-urban commuting area codes (RUCAs) http://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/ruca-about.php. Accessed July 9, 2019.Rural Health Research Center. Rural-urban commuting area codes (RUCAs) http://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/ruca-about.php. Accessed July 9, 2019., Rural Health Research Center. Rural-urban commuting area codes (RUCAs) http://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/ruca-about.php. Accessed July 9, 2019.
(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Consensus core set: ACO and PCMH/primary care measures, version 1.0. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/QualityMeasures/Downloads/ACO-and-PCMH-Primary-Care-Measures.pdf. Updated February 3, 2016. Accessed July 9, 2019.)
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Consensus core set: ACO and PCMH/primary care measures, version 1.0. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/QualityMeasures/Downloads/ACO-and-PCMH-Primary-Care-Measures.pdf. Updated February 3, 2016. Accessed July 9, 2019.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Consensus core set: ACO and PCMH/primary care measures, version 1.0. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/QualityMeasures/Downloads/ACO-and-PCMH-Primary-Care-Measures.pdf. Updated February 3, 2016. Accessed July 9, 2019., Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Consensus core set: ACO and PCMH/primary care measures, version 1.0. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/QualityMeasures/Downloads/ACO-and-PCMH-Primary-Care-Measures.pdf. Updated February 3, 2016. Accessed July 9, 2019.
(ShihCJ, ChuH, ChaoPW, Long-term clinical outcome of major adverse cardiac events in survivors of infective endocarditis: a nationwide population-based study. Circulation. 2014;130(19):1684-1691. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.012717 25223982)
ShihCJ, ChuH, ChaoPW, Long-term clinical outcome of major adverse cardiac events in survivors of infective endocarditis: a nationwide population-based study. Circulation. 2014;130(19):1684-1691. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.012717 25223982ShihCJ, ChuH, ChaoPW, Long-term clinical outcome of major adverse cardiac events in survivors of infective endocarditis: a nationwide population-based study. Circulation. 2014;130(19):1684-1691. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.012717 25223982, ShihCJ, ChuH, ChaoPW, Long-term clinical outcome of major adverse cardiac events in survivors of infective endocarditis: a nationwide population-based study. Circulation. 2014;130(19):1684-1691. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.012717 25223982
(StoneNJ, RobinsonJG, LichtensteinAH, ; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25, pt B):2889-2934. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.002 24239923)
StoneNJ, RobinsonJG, LichtensteinAH, ; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25, pt B):2889-2934. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.002 24239923StoneNJ, RobinsonJG, LichtensteinAH, ; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25, pt B):2889-2934. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.002 24239923, StoneNJ, RobinsonJG, LichtensteinAH, ; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25, pt B):2889-2934. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.002 24239923
(Webb NM, Shavelson RJ, Haertel EH. Reliability coefficients and generalizability theory In: Rao CR, Sinharay S, eds. Handbook of Statistics 26: Psychometrics Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier BV; 2006.)
Webb NM, Shavelson RJ, Haertel EH. Reliability coefficients and generalizability theory In: Rao CR, Sinharay S, eds. Handbook of Statistics 26: Psychometrics Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier BV; 2006.Webb NM, Shavelson RJ, Haertel EH. Reliability coefficients and generalizability theory In: Rao CR, Sinharay S, eds. Handbook of Statistics 26: Psychometrics Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier BV; 2006., Webb NM, Shavelson RJ, Haertel EH. Reliability coefficients and generalizability theory In: Rao CR, Sinharay S, eds. Handbook of Statistics 26: Psychometrics Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier BV; 2006.
(New England Journal of Medicine Catalyst. What is pay for performance in healthcare? https://catalyst.nejm.org/pay-for-performance-in-healthcare/. Published March 1, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2019.)
New England Journal of Medicine Catalyst. What is pay for performance in healthcare? https://catalyst.nejm.org/pay-for-performance-in-healthcare/. Published March 1, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2019.New England Journal of Medicine Catalyst. What is pay for performance in healthcare? https://catalyst.nejm.org/pay-for-performance-in-healthcare/. Published March 1, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2019., New England Journal of Medicine Catalyst. What is pay for performance in healthcare? https://catalyst.nejm.org/pay-for-performance-in-healthcare/. Published March 1, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2019.
(BradleyEH, HerrinJ, ElbelB, Hospital quality for acute myocardial infarction: correlation among process measures and relationship with short-term mortality. JAMA. 2006;296(1):-. doi:10.1001/jama.296.1.72 16820549)
BradleyEH, HerrinJ, ElbelB, Hospital quality for acute myocardial infarction: correlation among process measures and relationship with short-term mortality. JAMA. 2006;296(1):-. doi:10.1001/jama.296.1.72 16820549BradleyEH, HerrinJ, ElbelB, Hospital quality for acute myocardial infarction: correlation among process measures and relationship with short-term mortality. JAMA. 2006;296(1):-. doi:10.1001/jama.296.1.72 16820549, BradleyEH, HerrinJ, ElbelB, Hospital quality for acute myocardial infarction: correlation among process measures and relationship with short-term mortality. JAMA. 2006;296(1):-. doi:10.1001/jama.296.1.72 16820549
R. Lilford, Celia Brown, J. Nicholl (2007)
Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practiceBMJ : British Medical Journal, 335
E. McGlynn (1997)
Six challenges in measuring the quality of health care.Health affairs, 16 3
R. Hamad, S. Modrek, J. Kubo, B. Goldstein, M. Cullen (2015)
Using “Big Data” to Capture Overall Health Status: Properties and Predictive Value of a Claims-Based Health Risk ScorePLoS ONE, 10
(American Medical Association. Understanding Medicare’s merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS). https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/understanding-medicare-merit-based-incentive-program-mips. Accessed July 9, 2019.)
American Medical Association. Understanding Medicare’s merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS). https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/understanding-medicare-merit-based-incentive-program-mips. Accessed July 9, 2019.American Medical Association. Understanding Medicare’s merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS). https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/understanding-medicare-merit-based-incentive-program-mips. Accessed July 9, 2019., American Medical Association. Understanding Medicare’s merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS). https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/understanding-medicare-merit-based-incentive-program-mips. Accessed July 9, 2019.
E. Bradley, J. Herrin, Brian Elbel, R. McNamara, D. Magid, B. Nallamothu, Yongfei Wang, S. Normand, J. Spertus, H. Krumholz (2006)
Hospital quality for acute myocardial infarction: correlation among process measures and relationship with short-term mortality.JAMA, 296 1
(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Two-step attribution for measures included in the value modifier. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/PhysicianFeedbackProgram/Downloads/Attribution-Fact-Sheet.pdf. Updated March 2017. Accessed July 9, 2019.)
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Two-step attribution for measures included in the value modifier. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/PhysicianFeedbackProgram/Downloads/Attribution-Fact-Sheet.pdf. Updated March 2017. Accessed July 9, 2019.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Two-step attribution for measures included in the value modifier. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/PhysicianFeedbackProgram/Downloads/Attribution-Fact-Sheet.pdf. Updated March 2017. Accessed July 9, 2019., Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Two-step attribution for measures included in the value modifier. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/PhysicianFeedbackProgram/Downloads/Attribution-Fact-Sheet.pdf. Updated March 2017. Accessed July 9, 2019.
P. Hasvold, M. Thuresson, J. Sundström, N. Hammar, S. Kjeldsen, G. Johansson, I. Holme, J. Bodegård (2015)
Association Between Paradoxical HDL Cholesterol Decrease and Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients Initiated on Statin Treatment in a Primary Care SettingClinical Drug Investigation, 36
R. Eisinga, M. Grotenhuis, B. Pelzer (2013)
The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?International Journal of Public Health, 58
W. Lo‐Ciganic, J. Zgibor, K. Ruppert, V. Arena, R. Stone (2011)
Identifying Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetic Cases Using Administrative Data: A Tree-Structured ModelJournal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 5
Chia‐Jen Shih, Hsi Chu, Pei-wen Chao, Yi-Jung Lee, S. Kuo, Szu-Yuan Li, D. Tarng, Chih-Yu Yang, Wu-chang Yang, Shuo-Ming Ou, Yung-Tai Chen (2014)
Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Survivors of Infective Endocarditis: A Nationwide Population-Based StudyCirculation, 130
(Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Public meeting http://medpac.gov/docs/default-source/default-document-library/jan-2018-meeting-transcript.pdf?sfvrsn=0. Published January 11, 2018. Accessed July 9, 2019.)
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Public meeting http://medpac.gov/docs/default-source/default-document-library/jan-2018-meeting-transcript.pdf?sfvrsn=0. Published January 11, 2018. Accessed July 9, 2019.Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Public meeting http://medpac.gov/docs/default-source/default-document-library/jan-2018-meeting-transcript.pdf?sfvrsn=0. Published January 11, 2018. Accessed July 9, 2019., Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Public meeting http://medpac.gov/docs/default-source/default-document-library/jan-2018-meeting-transcript.pdf?sfvrsn=0. Published January 11, 2018. Accessed July 9, 2019.
(HawnMT, GrahamLA, RichmanJS, ItaniKM, HendersonWG, MaddoxTM Risk of major adverse cardiac events following noncardiac surgery in patients with coronary stents. JAMA. 2013;310(14):1462-1472. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.278787 24101118)
HawnMT, GrahamLA, RichmanJS, ItaniKM, HendersonWG, MaddoxTM Risk of major adverse cardiac events following noncardiac surgery in patients with coronary stents. JAMA. 2013;310(14):1462-1472. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.278787 24101118HawnMT, GrahamLA, RichmanJS, ItaniKM, HendersonWG, MaddoxTM Risk of major adverse cardiac events following noncardiac surgery in patients with coronary stents. JAMA. 2013;310(14):1462-1472. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.278787 24101118, HawnMT, GrahamLA, RichmanJS, ItaniKM, HendersonWG, MaddoxTM Risk of major adverse cardiac events following noncardiac surgery in patients with coronary stents. JAMA. 2013;310(14):1462-1472. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.278787 24101118
(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicare shared savings program: quality measure benchmarks for the 2018 and 2019 reporting years. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/sharedsavingsprogram/Downloads/2018-and-2019-quality-benchmarks-guidance.pdf. Published February 2019. Accessed April 1, 2019.)
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicare shared savings program: quality measure benchmarks for the 2018 and 2019 reporting years. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/sharedsavingsprogram/Downloads/2018-and-2019-quality-benchmarks-guidance.pdf. Published February 2019. Accessed April 1, 2019.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicare shared savings program: quality measure benchmarks for the 2018 and 2019 reporting years. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/sharedsavingsprogram/Downloads/2018-and-2019-quality-benchmarks-guidance.pdf. Published February 2019. Accessed April 1, 2019., Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicare shared savings program: quality measure benchmarks for the 2018 and 2019 reporting years. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/sharedsavingsprogram/Downloads/2018-and-2019-quality-benchmarks-guidance.pdf. Published February 2019. Accessed April 1, 2019.
(GilstrapLG, ChernewME, NguyenCSA, BaiB, LandrumMB Trends in statin use and adherence and the impact of the 2013 cholesterol guidelines. Paper presented at: American Heart Association National Meeting; November 2018; Chicago, Illinois.)
GilstrapLG, ChernewME, NguyenCSA, BaiB, LandrumMB Trends in statin use and adherence and the impact of the 2013 cholesterol guidelines. Paper presented at: American Heart Association National Meeting; November 2018; Chicago, Illinois.GilstrapLG, ChernewME, NguyenCSA, BaiB, LandrumMB Trends in statin use and adherence and the impact of the 2013 cholesterol guidelines. Paper presented at: American Heart Association National Meeting; November 2018; Chicago, Illinois., GilstrapLG, ChernewME, NguyenCSA, BaiB, LandrumMB Trends in statin use and adherence and the impact of the 2013 cholesterol guidelines. Paper presented at: American Heart Association National Meeting; November 2018; Chicago, Illinois.
M. Hawn, L. Graham, J. Richman, K. Itani, W. Henderson, T. Maddox (2013)
Risk of major adverse cardiac events following noncardiac surgery in patients with coronary stents.JAMA, 310 14
(EisingaR, GrotenhuisMt, PelzerB The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? Int J Public Health. 2013;58(4):637-642. doi:10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3 23089674)
EisingaR, GrotenhuisMt, PelzerB The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? Int J Public Health. 2013;58(4):637-642. doi:10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3 23089674EisingaR, GrotenhuisMt, PelzerB The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? Int J Public Health. 2013;58(4):637-642. doi:10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3 23089674, EisingaR, GrotenhuisMt, PelzerB The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? Int J Public Health. 2013;58(4):637-642. doi:10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3 23089674
(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Census regions and divisions of the United States https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/maps/reference/us_regdiv.pdf. Published March 28, 2018. Accessed July 9, 2019.)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Census regions and divisions of the United States https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/maps/reference/us_regdiv.pdf. Published March 28, 2018. Accessed July 9, 2019.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Census regions and divisions of the United States https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/maps/reference/us_regdiv.pdf. Published March 28, 2018. Accessed July 9, 2019., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Census regions and divisions of the United States https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/maps/reference/us_regdiv.pdf. Published March 28, 2018. Accessed July 9, 2019.
(HamadR, ModrekS, KuboJ, GoldsteinBA, CullenMR Using “big data” to capture overall health status: properties and predictive value of a claims-based health risk score. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126054. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126054 25951622)
HamadR, ModrekS, KuboJ, GoldsteinBA, CullenMR Using “big data” to capture overall health status: properties and predictive value of a claims-based health risk score. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126054. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126054 25951622HamadR, ModrekS, KuboJ, GoldsteinBA, CullenMR Using “big data” to capture overall health status: properties and predictive value of a claims-based health risk score. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126054. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126054 25951622, HamadR, ModrekS, KuboJ, GoldsteinBA, CullenMR Using “big data” to capture overall health status: properties and predictive value of a claims-based health risk score. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126054. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126054 25951622
(National Committee for Quality Assurance. Comprehensive diabetes care (CDC) https://www.ncqa.org/hedis/measures/comprehensive-diabetes-care/. Published 2019. Accessed July 9, 2019.)
National Committee for Quality Assurance. Comprehensive diabetes care (CDC) https://www.ncqa.org/hedis/measures/comprehensive-diabetes-care/. Published 2019. Accessed July 9, 2019.National Committee for Quality Assurance. Comprehensive diabetes care (CDC) https://www.ncqa.org/hedis/measures/comprehensive-diabetes-care/. Published 2019. Accessed July 9, 2019., National Committee for Quality Assurance. Comprehensive diabetes care (CDC) https://www.ncqa.org/hedis/measures/comprehensive-diabetes-care/. Published 2019. Accessed July 9, 2019.
L. Gilstrap, D. Snipelisky, Omar AbouEzzeddine, J. Vader, L. Cooper, Jacob Kelley, Antonio Pérez, Kenneth Varian, A. Lala, M. Shah, L. Stevenson (2017)
Unanswered Questions in Contemporary Heart Failure.Journal of cardiac failure, 23 10
(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Guide to quality performance standards for accountable care organizations starting in 2012: pay for reporting and pay for performance. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/sharedsavingsprogram/Downloads/ACO-Guide-Quality-Performance-2012.PDF. Published 2012. Accessed April 1, 2019.)
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Guide to quality performance standards for accountable care organizations starting in 2012: pay for reporting and pay for performance. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/sharedsavingsprogram/Downloads/ACO-Guide-Quality-Performance-2012.PDF. Published 2012. Accessed April 1, 2019.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Guide to quality performance standards for accountable care organizations starting in 2012: pay for reporting and pay for performance. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/sharedsavingsprogram/Downloads/ACO-Guide-Quality-Performance-2012.PDF. Published 2012. Accessed April 1, 2019., Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Guide to quality performance standards for accountable care organizations starting in 2012: pay for reporting and pay for performance. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/sharedsavingsprogram/Downloads/ACO-Guide-Quality-Performance-2012.PDF. Published 2012. Accessed April 1, 2019.
(McGlynnEA Six challenges in measuring the quality of health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 1997;16(3):7-21. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.16.3.7 9141316)
McGlynnEA Six challenges in measuring the quality of health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 1997;16(3):7-21. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.16.3.7 9141316McGlynnEA Six challenges in measuring the quality of health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 1997;16(3):7-21. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.16.3.7 9141316, McGlynnEA Six challenges in measuring the quality of health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 1997;16(3):7-21. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.16.3.7 9141316
L. Parast, Brian Doyle, C. Damberg, Kanaka Shetty, D. Ganz, N. Wenger, P. Shekelle (2015)
Challenges in Assessing the Process–Outcome Link in PracticeJournal of General Internal Medicine, 30
(ParastL, DoyleB, DambergCL, Challenges in assessing the process-outcome link in practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(3):359-364. doi:10.1007/s11606-014-3150-0 25564435)
ParastL, DoyleB, DambergCL, Challenges in assessing the process-outcome link in practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(3):359-364. doi:10.1007/s11606-014-3150-0 25564435ParastL, DoyleB, DambergCL, Challenges in assessing the process-outcome link in practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(3):359-364. doi:10.1007/s11606-014-3150-0 25564435, ParastL, DoyleB, DambergCL, Challenges in assessing the process-outcome link in practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(3):359-364. doi:10.1007/s11606-014-3150-0 25564435
(LilfordRJ, BrownCA, NichollJ Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practice. BMJ. 2007;335(7621):648-650. doi:10.1136/bmj.39317.641296.AD 17901516)
LilfordRJ, BrownCA, NichollJ Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practice. BMJ. 2007;335(7621):648-650. doi:10.1136/bmj.39317.641296.AD 17901516LilfordRJ, BrownCA, NichollJ Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practice. BMJ. 2007;335(7621):648-650. doi:10.1136/bmj.39317.641296.AD 17901516, LilfordRJ, BrownCA, NichollJ Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practice. BMJ. 2007;335(7621):648-650. doi:10.1136/bmj.39317.641296.AD 17901516
(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Two-step attribution for measures included in the value modifier. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/PhysicianFeedbackProgram/Downloads/Attribution-Fact-Sheet.pdf. Published August 2015. Accessed December 11, 2017.)
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Two-step attribution for measures included in the value modifier. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/PhysicianFeedbackProgram/Downloads/Attribution-Fact-Sheet.pdf. Published August 2015. Accessed December 11, 2017.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Two-step attribution for measures included in the value modifier. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/PhysicianFeedbackProgram/Downloads/Attribution-Fact-Sheet.pdf. Published August 2015. Accessed December 11, 2017., Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Two-step attribution for measures included in the value modifier. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/PhysicianFeedbackProgram/Downloads/Attribution-Fact-Sheet.pdf. Published August 2015. Accessed December 11, 2017.
(GrangerCB, StegPG, PetersonE, ; GRACE Investigators Medication performance measures and mortality following acute coronary syndromes. Am J Med. 2005;118(8):858-865. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.070 16084178)
GrangerCB, StegPG, PetersonE, ; GRACE Investigators Medication performance measures and mortality following acute coronary syndromes. Am J Med. 2005;118(8):858-865. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.070 16084178GrangerCB, StegPG, PetersonE, ; GRACE Investigators Medication performance measures and mortality following acute coronary syndromes. Am J Med. 2005;118(8):858-865. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.070 16084178, GrangerCB, StegPG, PetersonE, ; GRACE Investigators Medication performance measures and mortality following acute coronary syndromes. Am J Med. 2005;118(8):858-865. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.070 16084178
(Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Prevention quality indicators technical specifications updates: version 6.0 (ICD-9). https://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/Modules/PQI_TechSpec_ICD09_v60.aspx. Published October 2016. Accessed July 9, 2019.)
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Prevention quality indicators technical specifications updates: version 6.0 (ICD-9). https://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/Modules/PQI_TechSpec_ICD09_v60.aspx. Published October 2016. Accessed July 9, 2019.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Prevention quality indicators technical specifications updates: version 6.0 (ICD-9). https://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/Modules/PQI_TechSpec_ICD09_v60.aspx. Published October 2016. Accessed July 9, 2019., Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Prevention quality indicators technical specifications updates: version 6.0 (ICD-9). https://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/Modules/PQI_TechSpec_ICD09_v60.aspx. Published October 2016. Accessed July 9, 2019.
(GilstrapLG, SnipeliskyD, AbouEzzeddineO, Unanswered questions in contemporary heart failure. J Card Fail. 2017;23(10):770-774. doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.06.009 28689765)
GilstrapLG, SnipeliskyD, AbouEzzeddineO, Unanswered questions in contemporary heart failure. J Card Fail. 2017;23(10):770-774. doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.06.009 28689765GilstrapLG, SnipeliskyD, AbouEzzeddineO, Unanswered questions in contemporary heart failure. J Card Fail. 2017;23(10):770-774. doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.06.009 28689765, GilstrapLG, SnipeliskyD, AbouEzzeddineO, Unanswered questions in contemporary heart failure. J Card Fail. 2017;23(10):770-774. doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.06.009 28689765
(MedPAC June 2018 report to the Congress: Medicare and the health care delivery system. Applying the Commission’s principles for measuring quality: population-based measures and hospital quality incentives. http://www.medpac.gov/docs/default-source/reports/jun18_ch7_medpacreport_sec.pdf?sfvrsn=0. Published June 2018. Accessed April 1, 2019.)
MedPAC June 2018 report to the Congress: Medicare and the health care delivery system. Applying the Commission’s principles for measuring quality: population-based measures and hospital quality incentives. http://www.medpac.gov/docs/default-source/reports/jun18_ch7_medpacreport_sec.pdf?sfvrsn=0. Published June 2018. Accessed April 1, 2019.MedPAC June 2018 report to the Congress: Medicare and the health care delivery system. Applying the Commission’s principles for measuring quality: population-based measures and hospital quality incentives. http://www.medpac.gov/docs/default-source/reports/jun18_ch7_medpacreport_sec.pdf?sfvrsn=0. Published June 2018. Accessed April 1, 2019., MedPAC June 2018 report to the Congress: Medicare and the health care delivery system. Applying the Commission’s principles for measuring quality: population-based measures and hospital quality incentives. http://www.medpac.gov/docs/default-source/reports/jun18_ch7_medpacreport_sec.pdf?sfvrsn=0. Published June 2018. Accessed April 1, 2019.
N. Stone, Jennifer Robinson, A. Lichtenstein, C. Noel, B. Merz, D. Lloyd‐Jones, C. Blum, P. Mcbride, R. Eckel, F. Schwartz, A. Goldberg, Susan Shero, Rn, D. Gordon, Sidney Smith, D. Levy, K. Watson, P. Wilson, Karen Eddleman, N. Jarrett, K. Labresh, Lev Nevo, J. Wnek, Jeffrey Anderson, J. Halperin, N. Albert, J. Hochman, B. Bozkurt, R. Kovacs, R. Brindis, Macc Ohman, L. Curtis, S. Pressler, D. DeMets, F. Sellke, R. Guyton, W. Shen, G. Tomaselli, Stone Nj, Robinson J, Lichtenstein Ah, M. Bairey, Blum Cn, Eckel Cb, Goldberg Rh, Gordon Ac, Levy D, Lloyd-Jones Dm, P. Mcbride, Js Schwartz, Shero St, Smith Sc, W. Wilson (2014)
2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.Circulation, 129 25 Suppl 2
C. Granger, P. Steg, E. Peterson, J. López-Sendón, F. Werf, E. Kline-Rogers, Jeanna Allegrone, O. Dabbous, W. Klein, K. Fox, K. Eagle (2005)
Medication performance measures and mortality following acute coronary syndromes.The American journal of medicine, 118 8
(HasvoldP, ThuressonM, SundströmJ, Association between paradoxical HDL cholesterol decrease and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients initiated on statin treatment in a primary care setting. Clin Drug Investig. 2016;36(3):225-233. doi:10.1007/s40261-015-0372-9 26718960)
HasvoldP, ThuressonM, SundströmJ, Association between paradoxical HDL cholesterol decrease and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients initiated on statin treatment in a primary care setting. Clin Drug Investig. 2016;36(3):225-233. doi:10.1007/s40261-015-0372-9 26718960HasvoldP, ThuressonM, SundströmJ, Association between paradoxical HDL cholesterol decrease and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients initiated on statin treatment in a primary care setting. Clin Drug Investig. 2016;36(3):225-233. doi:10.1007/s40261-015-0372-9 26718960, HasvoldP, ThuressonM, SundströmJ, Association between paradoxical HDL cholesterol decrease and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients initiated on statin treatment in a primary care setting. Clin Drug Investig. 2016;36(3):225-233. doi:10.1007/s40261-015-0372-9 26718960
Clinical practice group performance on quality measures associated with chronic disease management has become central to reimbursement. Therefore, it is important to determine whether commonly used process and disease control measures for chronic conditions correlate with utilization-based outcomes, as they do in acute disease.
JAMA network open – Pubmed
Published: Jun 11, 2020
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.