Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Access to kidney transplantation. Has the United States eliminated income and racial differences?

Access to kidney transplantation. Has the United States eliminated income and racial differences? We analyzed the effect of patient and dialysis unit characteristics on access to kidney transplantation using several different approaches, including an analysis of individual patient data from a systematic random sample of 2900 new dialysis patients from each year 1981 to 1985 (14721 patients total). Additional analyses focused on the composition of transplant waiting lists and aggregate data from a 1984 census of 1133 dialysis and transplant units. White, male, young, nondiabetic, high-income patients treated in smaller units are more likely to receive a cadaver transplant under Medicare than are other kidney patients. Profit status of the dialysis unit was not found to be correlated to access to transplantation, although size of the unit may be correlated to access. Future analysis should focus on whether patient access has been inappropriately compromised. Possible factors unexplored in this analysis include differential patient preferences and medical suitability, as well as differential medical access. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archives of internal medicine Pubmed

Access to kidney transplantation. Has the United States eliminated income and racial differences?

Archives of internal medicine , Volume 148 (12): 7 – Jan 4, 1989

Access to kidney transplantation. Has the United States eliminated income and racial differences?


Abstract

We analyzed the effect of patient and dialysis unit characteristics on access to kidney transplantation using several different approaches, including an analysis of individual patient data from a systematic random sample of 2900 new dialysis patients from each year 1981 to 1985 (14721 patients total). Additional analyses focused on the composition of transplant waiting lists and aggregate data from a 1984 census of 1133 dialysis and transplant units. White, male, young, nondiabetic, high-income patients treated in smaller units are more likely to receive a cadaver transplant under Medicare than are other kidney patients. Profit status of the dialysis unit was not found to be correlated to access to transplantation, although size of the unit may be correlated to access. Future analysis should focus on whether patient access has been inappropriately compromised. Possible factors unexplored in this analysis include differential patient preferences and medical suitability, as well as differential medical access.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/pubmed/access-to-kidney-transplantation-has-the-united-states-eliminated-Mh2EtUHbT7

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

ISSN
0003-9926
DOI
10.1001/archinte.148.12.2594
pmid
3058072

Abstract

We analyzed the effect of patient and dialysis unit characteristics on access to kidney transplantation using several different approaches, including an analysis of individual patient data from a systematic random sample of 2900 new dialysis patients from each year 1981 to 1985 (14721 patients total). Additional analyses focused on the composition of transplant waiting lists and aggregate data from a 1984 census of 1133 dialysis and transplant units. White, male, young, nondiabetic, high-income patients treated in smaller units are more likely to receive a cadaver transplant under Medicare than are other kidney patients. Profit status of the dialysis unit was not found to be correlated to access to transplantation, although size of the unit may be correlated to access. Future analysis should focus on whether patient access has been inappropriately compromised. Possible factors unexplored in this analysis include differential patient preferences and medical suitability, as well as differential medical access.

Journal

Archives of internal medicinePubmed

Published: Jan 4, 1989

There are no references for this article.