Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B. Silva, S. Broy, S. Boutroy, J. Schousboe, J. Shepherd, W. Leslie (2015)
Fracture Risk Prediction by Non-BMD DXA Measures: the 2015 ISCD Official Positions Part 2: Trabecular Bone Score.Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, 18 3
I. Rapado, L. Shulman, H. Fleisch, P. Stern, C. Gennari, R. Morita, H. Genant, P. Burckhardt, C. Christiansen, W. Peck, E. Ogata, T. Martin, Luciano Martini (1993)
Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis.The American journal of medicine, 94 6
IM Kruger, M. Kruger, C. Doak, A. Kruger (2012)
Cut-off values of distal forearm bone density for the diagnosis of central osteoporosis in black postmenopausal South African womenJournal of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes of South Africa, 17
J. Shepherd, Xiao Cheng, Ying Lu, C. Njeh, J. Toschke, K. Engelke, M. Grigorian, H. Genant (2002)
Universal Standardization of Forearm Bone DensitometryJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 17
Sahana Shetty, N. Kapoor, Dukhabandhu Naik, H. Asha, N. Thomas, T. Paul (2014)
The impact of the Hologic vs the ICMR database in diagnosis of osteoporosis among South Indian subjectsClinical Endocrinology, 81
D. Hans, E. Šteňová, O. Lamy (2017)
The Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) Complements DXA and the FRAX as a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Routine Clinical PracticeCurrent Osteoporosis Reports, 15
(2019)
OsteoporosisLancet, 393
Madhur Verma, M. Das, Priyanka Sharma, N. Kapoor, S. Kalra (2021)
Epidemiology of overweight and obesity in Indian adults - A secondary data analysis of the National Family Health Surveys.Diabetes & metabolic syndrome, 15 4
A. Martin, L. Holder, V. Buie, J. Chandler, C. Girman, W. Hawkes, J. Hebel, J. Magaziner, P. Sloane, S. Zimmerman (1999)
Measurement of distal forearm bone mineral density: can different forearm segments be used interchangeably ?Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, 2 4
M. Boyanov (2001)
Diagnostic discrepancies between two closely related forearm bone density measurement sites.Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, 4 1
S. Cummings, W. Browner, D. Black, M. Nevitt, H. Genant, J. Cauley, K. Ensrud, J. Scott, T. Vogt (1993)
Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fracturesThe Lancet, 341
J. Damilakis, G. Papadokostakis, K. Perisinakis, A. Hadjipavlou, N. Gourtsoyiannis (2003)
Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?Osteoporosis International, 14
R. Schlenker, W. VonSeggen (1976)
The distribution of cortical and trabecular bone mass along the lengths of the radius and ulna and the implications forin vivo bone mass measurementsCalcified Tissue Research, 20
J. Pouillès, F. Trémollieres, S. Martinez, M. Delsol, C. Ribot (2001)
Ability of Peripheral DXA Measurements of the Forearm to Predict Low Axial Bone Mineral Density at MenopauseOsteoporosis International, 12
M. Bouxsein, R. Parker, S. Greenspan (1999)
Forearm Bone Mineral Densitometry Cannot be Used to Monitor Response to Alendronate Therapy in Postmenopausal WomenOsteoporosis International, 10
Cynthia Ogden, C. Fryar, Crescent Martin, D. Freedman, M. Carroll, Q. Gu, Craig Hales (2020)
Trends in Obesity Prevalence by Race and Hispanic Origin-1999-2000 to 2017-2018.JAMA
S. Khosla, B. Riggs, E. Atkinson, A. Oberg, Lisa McDaniel, Margaret Holets, J. Peterson, L. Melton (2005)
Effects of Sex and Age on Bone Microstructure at the Ultradistal Radius: A Population‐Based Noninvasive In Vivo AssessmentJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 21
J. Schousboe, J. Shepherd, J. Bilezikian, Sanford Baim (2013)
Executive summary of the 2013 International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference on bone densitometry.Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, 16 4
J. Kindler, H. Kalkwarf, J. Lappe, V. Gilsanz, S. Oberfield, J. Shepherd, A. Kelly, K. Winer, B. Zemel (2020)
Pediatric Reference Ranges for Ultradistal Radius Bone Density: Results from the Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
P. Ryan, G. Blake, I. Fogelman (1992)
Measurement of forearm bone mineral density in normal women by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.The British journal of radiology, 65 770
J. Martin, D. Reid (1996)
Appendicular measurements in screening women for low axial bone mineral density.The British journal of radiology, 69 819
Cynthia Ogden, M. Carroll, K. Flegal (2014)
Prevalence of obesity in the United States.JAMA, 312 2
C. Parenteau, E. Lau, Ian Campbell, A. Courtney (2021)
Prevalence of spine degeneration diagnosis by type, age, gender, and obesity using Medicare dataScientific Reports, 11
K. Sridharan, K. Cherian, M. Kurian, H. Asha, T. Paul, N. Kapoor (2020)
Utility of anthropometric indicators in predicting osteoporosis in ambulant community dwelling rural postmenopausal women from southern IndiaTropical Doctor, 50
Remya Rajan, K. Cherian, N. Kapoor, T. Paul (2020)
Trabecular Bone Score—An Emerging Tool in the Management of OsteoporosisIndian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 24
AbstractObjectiveThe objective of this paper was to present the results of our study of the utility of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at various segments of distal forearm in predicting central‐site osteoporosis and deteriorated trabecular microarchitecture.MethodsThis was a cross‐sectional study and BMD at the femoral neck, lumbar spine, and distal forearm were assessed using the dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner and bone microarchitecture at lumbar spine by trabecular bone score (TBS). The utility of forearm BMD in predicting osteoporosis as well as the deteriorated TBS was assessed by a receiver operating characteristic analysis.ResultsA total of 352 postmenopausal women with mean (SD) age of 60.7 (6.8) years were included. The odds of having osteoporosis at femoral neck [odds ratio (OR) = 14.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 7.8–25.2] and lumbar spine (OR = 7.5, 95% CI: 4.6–12.1) was highest with the mid‐distal radius. A derived T‐score cut off ≤ −1.6, −1.9, and −1.7 at any segment of the forearm was elucidated to predict osteoporosis at the central‐site, femoral neck, and lumbar spine, respectively, with sensitivity of 80%–88% and specificity of 60%–70%. The T‐scores at all three forearm segments ≤ −1.2 showed fair performance in predicting degraded trabecular microarchitecture. The T‐scores thus derived were further validated in cohort of 360 Bengali postmenopausal women.ConclusionBMD assessment at the forearm may be utilized in prediction of trabecular microarchitecture and central site osteoporosis at the femoral neck and lumbar spine in postmenopausal women.
Aging Medicine – Pubmed Central
Published: Jan 23, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.