“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”

Instant Access to Thousands of Journals for just $40/month

The Relationship between Psychology and Economics.

During the last twenty years there has been substantial progress in the development of economic psychology. By now, economists in academic institutions as well as in business and government have become accustomed to regard studies of psychological variables as contributions to the understanding of economic processes. Psychologists, however, seem to be less aware of research in economic psychology than economists, although such research may contribute substantially to psychological knowledge. In the past, many writings in economic psychology have been addressed to economists and have appeared in economic publications because the need for such material has been more pronounced in economic than in psychological research. Moreover, to the practitioners of economic psychology, it appeared more straightforward to address themselves to such economic problems as reactions to income and price changes or factors determining the demand for homes and automobiles than to analyze motivation, habit formation, and group belonging in the area of spending and saving. In either case the central problems were the same, only the labeling differed. The belief that economic psychology is applied psychology often makes for difficulties in understanding. It is sometimes thought that established theorems of psychology can clarify the problems inherent in, say, inflation or business cycles. If this were true, economic psychology might serve to enhance the collective ego of psychologists and raise the income of some psychologists who might be called in as consultants on economic problems, but it would hardly contribute to psychological theory. But economic psychology is not applied psychology. Even a related, somewhat broader view appears to be insufficient, namely, that economic behavior can serve as a testing ground for psychological generalizations and hypotheses originally developed about noneconomic behavior. We shall attempt to show that studies of spending, saving, investing, and the like can contribute to the development of knowledge of motives, habits, groups, and other areas of psychology. Furthermore, we shall attempt to show that some important psychological problems are more susceptible to study through analysis of economic behavior than through work in areas more traditional to psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved) http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

The Relationship between Psychology and Economics.

Abstract

During the last twenty years there has been substantial progress in the development of economic psychology. By now, economists in academic institutions as well as in business and government have become accustomed to regard studies of psychological variables as contributions to the understanding of economic processes. Psychologists, however, seem to be less aware of research in economic psychology than economists, although such research may contribute substantially to psychological knowledge. In the past, many writings in economic psychology have been addressed to economists and have appeared in economic publications because the need for such material has been more pronounced in economic than in psychological research. Moreover, to the practitioners of economic psychology, it appeared more straightforward to address themselves to such economic problems as reactions to income and price changes or factors determining the demand for homes and automobiles than to analyze motivation, habit formation, and group belonging in the area of spending and saving. In either case the central problems were the same, only the labeling differed. The belief that economic psychology is applied psychology often makes for difficulties in understanding. It is sometimes thought that established theorems of psychology can clarify the problems inherent in, say, inflation or business cycles. If this were true, economic psychology might serve to enhance the collective ego of psychologists and raise the income of some psychologists who might be called in as consultants on economic problems, but it would hardly contribute to psychological theory. But economic psychology is not applied psychology. Even a related, somewhat broader view appears to be insufficient, namely, that economic behavior can serve as a testing ground for psychological generalizations and hypotheses originally developed about noneconomic behavior. We shall attempt to show that studies of spending, saving, investing, and the like can contribute to the development of knowledge of motives, habits, groups, and other areas of psychology. Furthermore, we shall attempt to show that some important psychological problems are more susceptible to study through analysis of economic behavior than through work in areas more traditional to psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved)
Loading next page...
/lp/psycbooks-reg/the-relationship-between-psychology-and-economics-6S0siszUGu

Sorry, we don’t have permission to share this article on DeepDyve,
but here are related articles that you can start reading right now:

Explore the DeepDyve Library

How DeepDyve Works

Spend time researching, not time worrying you’re buying articles that might not be useful.

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from Springer, Elsevier, Nature, IEEE, Wiley-Blackwell and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Simple and Affordable Pricing

14-day free trial. Cancel anytime, with a 30-day money-back guarantee.

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$40/month

Best Deal — 25% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 25% off!
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$30/month
billed annually