Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
050 davis (89-138) 10/27/04 12:49 PM Page 89 Zen After Zarathustra: The Problem of the Will in the Confrontation Between Nietzsche and Buddhism Bret W. Davis s Nietzsche’s affirmation of the world and oneself as “the will to power—and Inothing besides” the path to a self-overcoming of nihilism; or is it, as Heidegger contends, the “ultimate entanglement in nihilism”? Is Buddhism the purest expression of a “passive nihilism,” as Nietzsche claims; or does it teach a radical “middle path” that twists free of both the life of the will to power and a pessimistic negation of the will to live? Does the Buddhist path go so far as to intimate a great affirmation of living otherwise than willing? From the outset, one thing does seem certain: venturing out to sail on the “open sea” (GS 343) of Nietzsche’s thought, we confront Buddhism as one of the most interesting and challenging “foreign perspectives” from which to “question one’s own.” And yet, rather than let his exposure to this other tradi- tion call into question his own philosophy of the will to power, Nietzsche him- self more often used his interpretation of Buddhism as a “rhetorical instrument” for his critique of
The Journal of Nietzsche Studies – Penn State University Press
Published: Nov 29, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.