Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Many works describe themselves as "genealogies", but it is far from clear that this term picks out a single kind of historical-philosophical project. This paper examines the role historical investigation plays in Bernard Williamsâs <i>Truth and Truthfulness</i> and contrasts it with the role of history in Nietzscheâs genealogy. Williams himself saw the philosophical approach in <i>Truth and Truthfulness</i> as an appropriation of Nietzscheâs historical method. However, the role of historical investigation in their respective works is in fact importantly different. Moreover, a key function of history in Nietzschean genealogy is to question assumptions that are required for history to play the role it does in Williamsâs project. Considering these differences can help us understand their respective projects as well as illustrate different ways historical investigation can be integrated into philosophical reflection.
The Journal of Nietzsche Studies – Penn State University Press
Published: Jul 10, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.