Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Under Western Critical Eyes: Du Fu

Under Western Critical Eyes: Du Fu abstract: The trend toward world literature and globalization in literary studies motivated Gayatri Spivak to make the ominous claim that Comparative Literature is dead. Her solution was to suggest that Comparative Literature join forces with Area Studies, and combine its techniques of "close reading" with a more focused and in-depth analysis of national literatures that only Area Studies can provide. Although this appears a welcome suggestion to give "new life" to Comparative Literature, there are obstacles in the way of this ideal. This essay discusses Spivak's idea with reference to Chinese aesthetics, namely, Haun Saussy and Stephen Owen, and an analysis of the late poems of Du Fu. The essay argues that the emphasis Chinese studies places on "distinctness," which is true of all Area Studies, hinders the possibility of a comparative reading. An analysis of Du Fu's late poems shows that there is a discrepancy in approaches between a Chinese and a Comparative approach that is irreconcilable. If Comparative Literature is to stay alive, it has to retain its theoretical freedom to "close reading" and forego the temptation to combine forces with Area Studies. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Comparative Literature Studies Penn State University Press

Under Western Critical Eyes: Du Fu

Comparative Literature Studies , Volume 54 (1) – Apr 3, 2017

Loading next page...
 
/lp/penn-state-university-press/under-western-critical-eyes-du-fu-rjSrhrlFsc
Publisher
Penn State University Press
Copyright
Copyright © The Pennsylvania State University.
ISSN
1528-4212
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

abstract: The trend toward world literature and globalization in literary studies motivated Gayatri Spivak to make the ominous claim that Comparative Literature is dead. Her solution was to suggest that Comparative Literature join forces with Area Studies, and combine its techniques of "close reading" with a more focused and in-depth analysis of national literatures that only Area Studies can provide. Although this appears a welcome suggestion to give "new life" to Comparative Literature, there are obstacles in the way of this ideal. This essay discusses Spivak's idea with reference to Chinese aesthetics, namely, Haun Saussy and Stephen Owen, and an analysis of the late poems of Du Fu. The essay argues that the emphasis Chinese studies places on "distinctness," which is true of all Area Studies, hinders the possibility of a comparative reading. An analysis of Du Fu's late poems shows that there is a discrepancy in approaches between a Chinese and a Comparative approach that is irreconcilable. If Comparative Literature is to stay alive, it has to retain its theoretical freedom to "close reading" and forego the temptation to combine forces with Area Studies.

Journal

Comparative Literature StudiesPenn State University Press

Published: Apr 3, 2017

There are no references for this article.