SYMPOSIUM In recent decades, the scholarly reaction to the Supreme drafters and supporters intended. It is also put forth as the demCourt's activism of the 1960s and early 1970s has been almost ocratic thing to do since the Constitution and its amendments exclusively normative. The preponderant effort has been to show are to be viewed as effectively "super-statutes" adopted by an that the activism was wrong--that the Court abused its power extraordinary majority which can properly be altered only by by using it to excess. Most of the criticism can be fairly seen as another such extraordinary majority. a conservative ideological reaction to the liberal values that aniThe proposition that broad constitutional provisions might be mated that activism. It coincided with significant changes in properly approached somewhat differently from most ordinary American politics: the decay of the political coalition that prostatutes usually gains no appreciation. Indeed, the strenuous insisvided a climate of support for the broad thrust (if not all the tence on confining constitutional interpretation to original intent details) of what is usually thought of as "Warren Court" often seems premised upon an almost "fundamentalist" insisactivism, and the gradual coming to power of a new conservatence on
The Good Society – Penn State University Press
Published: Mar 12, 2002
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera