Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
<p>Abstract:</p><p>In this reply, I defend my views on Nietzscheâs âfalsification thesisâ and his perspectivism against Maudemarie Clarkâs recent criticisms, which appeared in <i>The Journal of Nietzsche Studies</i> 49.1. I begin by amplifying my interpretation of <i>Gay Science</i> 110 and 111, which, I argue, show that the falsification thesis is absent from <i>The Gay Science</i>. I then turn to perspectivism and argue that, contrary to Clarkâs claims, perspectivism never involves the falsification of the views to which it applies. It is therefore unnecessary to apply perspectivism, as Clark does, only to value-imbued viewpoints and not to empirical knowledge or the natural sciences. Perspectivism, as Nietzsche, I believe, makes clear, applies to every aspect of human knowledge.</p>
The Journal of Nietzsche Studies – Penn State University Press
Published: Dec 5, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.