Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Not Just Cause and Effect: Resituating Martha Nussbaum’s Defense of Novels as Moral Philosophy in a Hermeneutical Framework

Not Just Cause and Effect: Resituating Martha Nussbaum’s Defense of Novels as Moral Philosophy in... abstract: This article brings Martha Nussbaum’s defense of novels as contributors to moral philosophy into conversation with Lambert Zuidervaart’s theories of artistic truth and ethical responsibility in art and society. Nussbaum’s defense of novels as moral philosophy emphasizes the integrality of form and content and is founded on her understanding of normativity as immanent and revisable, rather than transcendent and eternal. Her discussion of fiction, however, focuses on the “impact” of reading novels on the individual, which may seem to imply a direct, causal connection between reading and becoming a better person. In contrast, Zuidervaart argues that art, including literature, is thoroughly hermeneutical. This means that a causal model is not capable of successfully framing the relationship between literature and moral philosophy. A thoroughly articulated hermeneutical model for the interaction between fiction and normativity would make Nussbaum’s theory more convincing. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Interdisciplinary Literary Studies Penn State University Press

Not Just Cause and Effect: Resituating Martha Nussbaum’s Defense of Novels as Moral Philosophy in a Hermeneutical Framework

Van Dyk, Tricia
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies , Volume 19 (2) – Jun 16, 2017
Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/penn-state-university-press/not-just-cause-and-effect-resituating-martha-nussbaum-s-defense-of-KDt02URhRA
Publisher
Penn State University Press
Copyright
Copyright © The Pennsylvania State University.
ISSN
2161-427X
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

abstract: This article brings Martha Nussbaum’s defense of novels as contributors to moral philosophy into conversation with Lambert Zuidervaart’s theories of artistic truth and ethical responsibility in art and society. Nussbaum’s defense of novels as moral philosophy emphasizes the integrality of form and content and is founded on her understanding of normativity as immanent and revisable, rather than transcendent and eternal. Her discussion of fiction, however, focuses on the “impact” of reading novels on the individual, which may seem to imply a direct, causal connection between reading and becoming a better person. In contrast, Zuidervaart argues that art, including literature, is thoroughly hermeneutical. This means that a causal model is not capable of successfully framing the relationship between literature and moral philosophy. A thoroughly articulated hermeneutical model for the interaction between fiction and normativity would make Nussbaum’s theory more convincing.

Journal

Interdisciplinary Literary Studies – Penn State University Press

Published: Jun 16, 2017

There are no references for this article.