Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
<p>abstract:</p><p> This article brings Martha Nussbaumâs defense of novels as contributors to moral philosophy into conversation with Lambert Zuidervaartâs theories of artistic truth and ethical responsibility in art and society. Nussbaumâs defense of novels as moral philosophy emphasizes the integrality of form and content and is founded on her understanding of normativity as immanent and revisable, rather than transcendent and eternal. Her discussion of fiction, however, focuses on the âimpactâ of reading novels on the individual, which may seem to imply a direct, causal connection between reading and becoming a better person. In contrast, Zuidervaart argues that art, including literature, is thoroughly hermeneutical. This means that a causal model is not capable of successfully framing the relationship between literature and moral philosophy. A thoroughly articulated hermeneutical model for the interaction between fiction and normativity would make Nussbaumâs theory more convincing. </p>
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies – Penn State University Press
Published: Jun 16, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.