Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
makes Nietzsche's work incomplete, since many of his observations cannot reach a complete form and become "theories." This is quite clear if one considers the inconstancy and changeability that characterize Nietzsche's lexicon, which are the sign of a work in progress as much as of the theoretical uncertainty of the thinker himself. The main evidence of this "theoretical fluidity" is the richness of the range of words that Nietzsche uses to define some relevant notions related to the wider theme of the consciousness. The examples that Lupo gives are that of the "time inversion" (47) and that of the consciousness status of "feeling" (99100); they are both described by Nietzsche with many different words, and one cannot find a univocal and final definition of them. Therefore, with this book Lupo reaches two important outcomes: first, he deals with a subject of great interest that has not yet been deeply investigated; second, he clearly shows that the content of the unpublished notes can help us to describe Nietzsche in a new way, quite different from the poetic image drawn by the first scholars. Moreover, the notebooks reveal a great theoretical value, since their content is necessary to enlighten the
The Journal of Nietzsche Studies – Penn State University Press
Published: May 30, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.