Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Nietzsche and Ethics (review)

Nietzsche and Ethics (review) BOOK REVIEWS 161 3. But see section 1 of Hurka’s essay and most of Reginster’s. Indeed, Reginster’s contribution might be profitably read as a précis of his recent The Affirmation of Life (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006). 4. Brian Leiter, Nietzsche on Morality (New York: Routledge, 2002). 5. Ken Gemes and Christopher Janaway, “Naturalism and Value in Nietzsche,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2005): 740. 6. Bernard Williams, “Nietzsche’s Minimalist Moral Psychology,” in Making Sense of Humanity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 66. 7. Cf. Wallace regarding value (“It is not clear to me that Nietzsche was really interested in offering … a worked-out position that might be assigned a precise position on the landscape of metaethical views” [134]) and, for that matter, Leiter’s own worries concerning anachronism and metaethics in, e.g., “Nietzsche’s Metaethics: Against the Privilege Readings,” European Journal of Philosophy 8 (2000): 277–97, with which the latter part of Hussain’s essay engages. 8. Readers with little or no background in contemporary ethical theory may wish to keep a scorecard. Clark and Dudrick themselves cite, and appear to have made use of, Alexander Miller’s An Introduction to Contemporary Metaethics (Cambridge: Polity, 2003), a nice aid to scorekeeping. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Journal of Nietzsche Studies Penn State University Press

Nietzsche and Ethics (review)

Liebscher, Martin, --
The Journal of Nietzsche Studies , Volume 35 (1) – Nov 28, 2008
Download PDF
4 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/penn-state-university-press/nietzsche-and-ethics-review-E3JPR7iqAW

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Penn State University Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 The Pennsylvania State University.
ISSN
1538-4594

Abstract

BOOK REVIEWS 161 3. But see section 1 of Hurka’s essay and most of Reginster’s. Indeed, Reginster’s contribution might be profitably read as a précis of his recent The Affirmation of Life (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006). 4. Brian Leiter, Nietzsche on Morality (New York: Routledge, 2002). 5. Ken Gemes and Christopher Janaway, “Naturalism and Value in Nietzsche,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2005): 740. 6. Bernard Williams, “Nietzsche’s Minimalist Moral Psychology,” in Making Sense of Humanity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 66. 7. Cf. Wallace regarding value (“It is not clear to me that Nietzsche was really interested in offering … a worked-out position that might be assigned a precise position on the landscape of metaethical views” [134]) and, for that matter, Leiter’s own worries concerning anachronism and metaethics in, e.g., “Nietzsche’s Metaethics: Against the Privilege Readings,” European Journal of Philosophy 8 (2000): 277–97, with which the latter part of Hussain’s essay engages. 8. Readers with little or no background in contemporary ethical theory may wish to keep a scorecard. Clark and Dudrick themselves cite, and appear to have made use of, Alexander Miller’s An Introduction to Contemporary Metaethics (Cambridge: Polity, 2003), a nice aid to scorekeeping.

Journal

The Journal of Nietzsche Studies – Penn State University Press

Published: Nov 28, 2008

There are no references for this article.