Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Immanent Critique as Self-Transformative Practice: Hegel, Dewey, and Contemporary Critical Theory

Immanent Critique as Self-Transformative Practice: Hegel, Dewey, and Contemporary Critical Theory ABSTRACT: There are two traditions of immanent social critique. One of them, prominent in contemporary Frankfurt school critical theory, regards the immanence of critique as a quality of the standard employed. Such a conception of immanent critique needs to show, prior to the concrete practice of critique, how the standard is immanent in the object of critique. Showing this is the task of a “model of immanent critique.” The other tradition, going back to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit and practiced in particular by Dewey in his later works, regards the immanence of critique as the form of critical practice itself. Because such a conception of immanent critique does not, at the outset, ask how the standard is immanent to its object, it also does not need a model licensing critical practice. Indeed, it must be inherently hostile to any attempt at modeling immanent critique because the immanence lies in the power of critical practice to transform any models it applies. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Journal of Speculative Philosophy Penn State University Press

Immanent Critique as Self-Transformative Practice: Hegel, Dewey, and Contemporary Critical Theory

The Journal of Speculative Philosophy , Volume 31 (2) – Mar 29, 2017

Loading next page...
 
/lp/penn-state-university-press/immanent-critique-as-self-transformative-practice-hegel-dewey-and-VJYh2ULtQp
Publisher
Penn State University Press
Copyright
Copyright © Pennsylvania State University
ISSN
1527-9383
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

ABSTRACT: There are two traditions of immanent social critique. One of them, prominent in contemporary Frankfurt school critical theory, regards the immanence of critique as a quality of the standard employed. Such a conception of immanent critique needs to show, prior to the concrete practice of critique, how the standard is immanent in the object of critique. Showing this is the task of a “model of immanent critique.” The other tradition, going back to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit and practiced in particular by Dewey in his later works, regards the immanence of critique as the form of critical practice itself. Because such a conception of immanent critique does not, at the outset, ask how the standard is immanent to its object, it also does not need a model licensing critical practice. Indeed, it must be inherently hostile to any attempt at modeling immanent critique because the immanence lies in the power of critical practice to transform any models it applies.

Journal

The Journal of Speculative PhilosophyPenn State University Press

Published: Mar 29, 2017

There are no references for this article.