Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
O N P L U R A L I S M A N D L I B E R A L D E M O C R AC Y George Kateb Can there be a general defense of pluralism? Richard Flathman's pluralism says that people should not shun their internal division Pluralism and Liberal Democracy is certainly a book that aims to into parts or their duality or multiplicity, but instead explore it provide such a defense. The merits of the book are many; and thus celebrate the complexity of their constitution. Internal Flathman's interpretations of some leading thinkers of pluralism complexity is often hard to acknowledge or painful to explore, from William James onward into the twentieth century are subtly but attention to it may liberate a person from a rigid and simpleand richly developed, and comparisons among the thinkers often minded understanding of oneself or others. illuminate each one. Nevertheless, I 2. The pluralism of diverse individuals think that there is a conceptual difficulty in any given society arises from the undeIf I am correct in thinking that there inherent in any attempt to praise pluralniable fact that all human beings are are incompatibilities, at least
The Good Society – Penn State University Press
Published: Jan 7, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.