Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Expression, Animation, and Intelligibility: Concepts for a Decolonial Feminist Affect Theory

Expression, Animation, and Intelligibility: Concepts for a Decolonial Feminist Affect Theory <p>abstract:</p><p>This article considers Lisa Feldman Barrett&apos;s challenge to Darwin&apos;s claim—popularized by Paul Ekman&apos;s cross-cultural studies—that facial expressions are intelligible across the species. Barrett considers how Ekman&apos;s research expectations normalize Eurocentric gestures; she proposes that emotions are not hardwired but constructed in a dynamic interplay of interpretation and prediction. Drawing connections between this argument and decolonial feminist challenges to prominent Western accounts of what it means to be human—including Sylvia Wynter on the "ethnoclass of Man" and Sianne Ngai on racialized and feminized "animatedness"—this article explores what assumptions might underpin claims of affective intelligibility across cultures, and develops concepts toward a decolonial feminist affect theory.</p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Journal of Speculative Philosophy Penn State University Press

Expression, Animation, and Intelligibility: Concepts for a Decolonial Feminist Affect Theory

The Journal of Speculative Philosophy , Volume 34 (3) – Aug 25, 2020

Loading next page...
 
/lp/penn-state-university-press/expression-animation-and-intelligibility-concepts-for-a-decolonial-OqiCzfv0z0
Publisher
Penn State University Press
Copyright
Copyright © Pennsylvania State University
ISSN
1527-9383

Abstract

<p>abstract:</p><p>This article considers Lisa Feldman Barrett&apos;s challenge to Darwin&apos;s claim—popularized by Paul Ekman&apos;s cross-cultural studies—that facial expressions are intelligible across the species. Barrett considers how Ekman&apos;s research expectations normalize Eurocentric gestures; she proposes that emotions are not hardwired but constructed in a dynamic interplay of interpretation and prediction. Drawing connections between this argument and decolonial feminist challenges to prominent Western accounts of what it means to be human—including Sylvia Wynter on the "ethnoclass of Man" and Sianne Ngai on racialized and feminized "animatedness"—this article explores what assumptions might underpin claims of affective intelligibility across cultures, and develops concepts toward a decolonial feminist affect theory.</p>

Journal

The Journal of Speculative PhilosophyPenn State University Press

Published: Aug 25, 2020

There are no references for this article.