Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Willingness to Pay, Death, Wealth, and Damages

Willingness to Pay, Death, Wealth, and Damages When people face risk of death, they overinvest in risk reduction: first, they discount their risk-reduction costs by the probability of death; second, they consider the consumption of their wealth as a benefit from risk reduction. From a social perspective, people's wealth remains after their death. Therefore, discounting costs by the probability of death and taking into account the benefit of wealth consumption are socially inefficient. Moreover, even for the individual under risk of death, the investment in risk reduction is excessive. We discuss market mechanisms that could correct the inefficiencies; we argue that willingness to pay as a criterion for valuing life should radically change; and we show how the results of the economic analysis of tort law should be modified. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Law and Economics Review Oxford University Press

Willingness to Pay, Death, Wealth, and Damages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/willingness-to-pay-death-wealth-and-damages-FPv96TJrsk

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Law and Economics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
ISSN
1465-7252
eISSN
1465-7260
DOI
10.1093/aler/ahq028
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

When people face risk of death, they overinvest in risk reduction: first, they discount their risk-reduction costs by the probability of death; second, they consider the consumption of their wealth as a benefit from risk reduction. From a social perspective, people's wealth remains after their death. Therefore, discounting costs by the probability of death and taking into account the benefit of wealth consumption are socially inefficient. Moreover, even for the individual under risk of death, the investment in risk reduction is excessive. We discuss market mechanisms that could correct the inefficiencies; we argue that willingness to pay as a criterion for valuing life should radically change; and we show how the results of the economic analysis of tort law should be modified.

Journal

American Law and Economics ReviewOxford University Press

Published: Apr 7, 2011

Keywords: JEL D60 D80 I10 K13 K32

There are no references for this article.