Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

When Opposites Detract: Categorical Reasoning and Subtractive Valuations of Product Combinations

When Opposites Detract: Categorical Reasoning and Subtractive Valuations of Product Combinations Can pairing items from different price tiers decrease consumers’ perceptions of monetary value? Prior research suggests that adding an item with positive utility to an offering can only increase the offering’s overall value. In contrast, we show that combining expensive and inexpensive items can lead to subtractive rather than additive judgments, such that consumers are willing to pay less for the combination than for the expensive item alone. We attribute this subtraction effect to the categorical nature of consumers’ processing of numeric information when evaluating combinations of items classified into opposing categories. Five empirical studies lend converging support to the proposition that categorical reasoning can lead to subtractive judgments. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Consumer Research Oxford University Press

When Opposites Detract: Categorical Reasoning and Subtractive Valuations of Product Combinations

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/when-opposites-detract-categorical-reasoning-and-subtractive-lgnALv7MWS

References (63)

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© 2011 by Journal of Consumer Research, Inc.
ISSN
0093-5301
eISSN
1537-5277
DOI
10.1086/663773
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Can pairing items from different price tiers decrease consumers’ perceptions of monetary value? Prior research suggests that adding an item with positive utility to an offering can only increase the offering’s overall value. In contrast, we show that combining expensive and inexpensive items can lead to subtractive rather than additive judgments, such that consumers are willing to pay less for the combination than for the expensive item alone. We attribute this subtraction effect to the categorical nature of consumers’ processing of numeric information when evaluating combinations of items classified into opposing categories. Five empirical studies lend converging support to the proposition that categorical reasoning can lead to subtractive judgments.

Journal

Journal of Consumer ResearchOxford University Press

Published: Aug 1, 2012

There are no references for this article.