Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Böhning (1999)
Computer-Assisted Analysis of Mixtures and Applications: Meta-Analysis, Disease Mapping, and Others
Douglas Jb (2000)
Computer-assisted analysis of mixtures.Biometrics, 56
J. Neuhaus, W. Hauck, J. Kalbfleisch (1992)
The effects of mixture distribution misspecification when fitting mixed-effects logistic modelsBiometrika, 79
Thomas Have, Allen Kunselman, Luan Tran (1999)
A comparison of mixed effects logistic regression models for binary response data with two nested levels of clustering.Statistics in medicine, 18 8
D. Böhning (1989)
Likelihood inference for mixtures: Geometrical and other constructions of monotone step-length algorithmsBiometrika, 76
D. Böhning, E. Dietz, Peter Schlattmann (1998)
Recent developments in computer-assisted analysis of mixtures.Biometrics, 54 2
Ariel Alonso, S. Litière, G. Molenberghs (2008)
A family of tests to detect misspecifications in the random-effects structure of generalized linear mixed modelsComput. Stat. Data Anal., 52
S. Zeger, P. Heagerty (2000)
Marginalized Multilevel Models and Likelihood InferenceStatistical Science, 15
C. Ritz (2004)
Goodness‐of‐fit Tests for Mixed ModelsScandinavian Journal of Statistics, 31
D. Böhning (1986)
A vertex-exchange-method in D-optimal design theoryMetrika, 33
Muthén Bengt, Asparouhov Tihomir (2008)
Growth mixture modeling
B. Lindsay (1983)
The Geometry of Mixture Likelihoods, Part II: The Exponential FamilyAnnals of Statistics, 11
Lei Liu, Zhangsheng Yu (2008)
A likelihood reformulation method in non‐normal random effects modelsStatistics in Medicine, 27
B. Lindsay (1983)
The Geometry of Mixture Likelihoods: A General TheoryAnnals of Statistics, 11
Donald Hedeker, Robert Gibbons (2006)
Longitudinal Data Analysis
R. Littell, G. Milliken, W. Stroup, R. Wolfinger, O. Schabenberger (2006)
SAS for Mixed Models, Second Edition
Zhiying Pan, Danyu Lin (2005)
Goodness‐of‐Fit Methods for Generalized Linear Mixed ModelsBiometrics, 61
G. Molenberghs, G. Verbeke (2005)
Models for Discrete Longitudinal Data
A. Agresti, B. Caffo, P. Ohman-Strickland (2004)
Examples in which misspecification of a random effects distribution reduces efficiency, and possible remediesComput. Stat. Data Anal., 47
D. Roberts (1992)
Prevalence of dermatophyte onychomycosis in the United Kingdom: Results of an omnibus surveyBritish Journal of Dermatology, 126
P. Heagerty (1999)
Marginally Specified Logistic‐Normal Models for Longitudinal Binary DataBiometrics, 55
G. Verbeke, E. Lesaffre (1996)
A Linear Mixed-Effects Model with Heterogeneity in the Random-Effects PopulationJournal of the American Statistical Association, 91
G. Verbeke, E. Lesaffre, B. Spiessens (2001)
The Practical Use of Different Strategies to Handle Dropout in Longitudinal StudiesDrug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 35
Josae Pinheiro, D. Bates (2001)
Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUSTechnometrics, 43
L. Magder, S. Zeger (1996)
A Smooth Nonparametric Estimate of a Mixing Distribution Using Mixtures of GaussiansJournal of the American Statistical Association, 91
P. Heagerty, B. Kurland (2001)
Misspecified maximum likelihood estimates and generalised linear mixed modelsBiometrika, 88
Daowen Zhang, M. Davidian (2001)
Linear Mixed Models with Flexible Distributions of Random Effects for Longitudinal DataBiometrics, 57
G. Molenberghs, G. Verbeke, C. Demétrio (2007)
An extended random-effects approach to modeling repeated, overdispersed count dataLifetime Data Analysis, 13
(2008)
The impact of a misspecified random-effects distribution on maximum likelihood estimation in generalized linear mixed models. Statistics in Medicine, doi: 10.1002/sim
D. Böhning, P. Schlattmann, B. Lindsay (1992)
Computer-assisted analysis of mixtures (C.A.MAN) statistical algorithmsBiometrics, 48
B. Everitt (1998)
Analysis of longitudinal dataBritish Journal of Psychiatry, 172
P. Boeck, Mark Wilson (2004)
Explanatory item response models : a generalized linear and nonlinear approach
G. Molenberghs (2009)
Longitudinal Data Analysis. Handbooks of Modern Statistical Methods
E. Tchetgen, B. Coull (2006)
A diagnostic test for the mixing distribution in a generalised linear mixed modelBiometrika, 93
R. Tsonaka, G. Verbeke, E. Lesaffre (2009)
A Semi‐Parametric Shared Parameter Model to Handle Nonmonotone Nonignorable MissingnessBiometrics, 65
T. Have, A. Kunselman, E. Pulkstenis, J. Landis (1998)
Mixed effects logistic regression models for longitudinal binary response data with informative drop-out.Biometrics, 54 1
N. Lange, L. Ryan (1989)
ASSESSING NORMALITY IN RANDOM EFFECTS MODELSAnnals of Statistics, 17
G. Verbeke, E. Lesaffre (1997)
The effect of misspecifying the random-effects distribution in linear mixed models for longitudinal dataComputational Statistics & Data Analysis, 23
W. Ghidey, E. Lesaffre, P. Eilers (2004)
Smooth Random Effects Distribution in a Linear Mixed ModelBiometrics, 60
G. Verbeke, G. Molenberghs (2001)
Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data
S. Litière, Ariel Alonso, G. Molenberghs (2007)
Type I and Type II Error Under Random‐Effects Misspecification in Generalized Linear Mixed ModelsBiometrics, 63
G. Molenberghs, M. Kenward (2007)
Missing Data in Clinical Studies
Xianzheng Huang (2009)
Diagnosis of Random‐Effect Model Misspecification in Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Binary ResponseBiometrics, 65
M. Backer, P. Keyser, C. Vroey, Emmanuel Lesaffre (1996)
A 12–week treatment for dermatophyte toe onychomycosis terbinafine 250mg/day vs. itraconazole 200mg/day—a double‐blind comparative trialBritish Journal of Dermatology, 134
(2008)
The SAS System for Windows
Inference in mixed models is often based on the marginal distribution obtained from integrating out random effects over a pre-specified, often parametric, distribution. In this paper, we present the so-called gradient function as a simple graphical exploratory diagnostic tool to assess whether the assumed random-effects distribution produces an adequate fit to the data, in terms of marginal likelihood. The method does not require any calculations in addition to the computations needed to fit the model, and can be applied to a wide range of mixed models (linear, generalized linear, non-linear), with univariate as well as multivariate random effects, as long as the distribution for the outcomes conditional on the random effects is correctly specified. In case of model misspecification, the gradient function gives an important, albeit informal, indication on how the model can be improved in terms of random-effects distribution. The diagnostic value of the gradient function is extensively illustrated using some simulated examples, as well as in the analysis of a real longitudinal study with binary outcome values.
Biostatistics – Oxford University Press
Published: Jul 31, 2013
Keywords: Directional derivative Gradient Latent variables Mixed models Random effects Random-effects distribution
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.