“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”

Instant Access to Thousands of Journals for just $40/month

The Electoral System: Biased to Blair?

BY JOHN CURTICE THE 2001 election result has been widely described as a second landslide Labour victory. This is hardly surprising. After all, Labour won just six seats fewer than their record tally of 419 in 1997. The party’s overall majority of 167 is greater than that enjoyed by any British government between 1945 and 1997. Yet if we look at the outcome of the 2001 election in terms of votes, Labour’s performance looks much less impressive. At 42.0%, the party’s share of the vote in Great Britain was lower than that enjoyed by any postwar British government apart from the two administrations formed by Harold Wilson after the elections in February and October 1974. Equally, at 9.3%, Labour’s lead over the Conservatives was less than that enjoyed by Clement Attlee in 1945 and by Margaret Thatcher in both 1983 and 1987. Yet none of those contests produced as large a majority for the winner as that enjoyed by Tony Blair. But perhaps the most telling comparison is with the outcome of the 1992 general election. At 42.8%, John Major’s share of the vote at that election was actually a little higher than that secured by Tony Blair http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Parliamentary Affairs Oxford University Press

The Electoral System: Biased to Blair?

Abstract

BY JOHN CURTICE THE 2001 election result has been widely described as a second landslide Labour victory. This is hardly surprising. After all, Labour won just six seats fewer than their record tally of 419 in 1997. The party’s overall majority of 167 is greater than that enjoyed by any British government between 1945 and 1997. Yet if we look at the outcome of the 2001 election in terms of votes, Labour’s performance looks much less impressive. At 42.0%, the party’s share of the vote in Great Britain was lower than that enjoyed by any postwar British government apart from the two administrations formed by Harold Wilson after the elections in February and October 1974. Equally, at 9.3%, Labour’s lead over the Conservatives was less than that enjoyed by Clement Attlee in 1945 and by Margaret Thatcher in both 1983 and 1987. Yet none of those contests produced as large a majority for the winner as that enjoyed by Tony Blair. But perhaps the most telling comparison is with the outcome of the 1992 general election. At 42.8%, John Major’s share of the vote at that election was actually a little higher than that secured by Tony Blair
Loading next page...
1
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/the-electoral-system-biased-to-blair-EEJd8FwyrJ

Sorry, we don’t have permission to share this article on DeepDyve,
but here are related articles that you can start reading right now:

Explore the DeepDyve Library

How DeepDyve Works

Spend time researching, not time worrying you’re buying articles that might not be useful.

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from Springer, Elsevier, Nature, IEEE, Wiley-Blackwell and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Simple and Affordable Pricing

14-day free trial. Cancel anytime, with a 30-day money-back guarantee.

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$40/month

Best Deal — 25% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 25% off!
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$30/month
billed annually