The Communication Process as Evaluative Context: What Do Nonscientists Hear When Scientists Speak?

The Communication Process as Evaluative Context: What Do Nonscientists Hear When Scientists Speak? Articles The Communication Process as Evaluative Context: What Do Nonscientists Hear When Scientists Speak? JAMES R. WEBER AND CHARLOTTE SCHELL WORD The cause and root of nearly all evils in science is this—that SCIENTISTS AND NONSCIENTISTS BENEFIT while we falsely admire and extol the powers of the human mind, we neglect to seek for its true helps. BY RECOGNIZING THAT ATTEMPTS AT Francis Bacon Aphorism IX, Novum Organum MUTUAL INFLUENCE, MULTIPLE FRAMES OF n the first paragraph of a letter in the “Science’s REFERENCE, AND “OBJECTIVE” INFORMA- ICompass” section of Science (Bazzaz et al. 1998), a group TION IN SCIENCE COMMUNICATION ARE of eminent ecologists notes that good science used to involve doing first-rate research and publishing it in the scientific lit- NOT NEUTRAL BUT EVALUATED WITH erature. Now, however, they note a third necessary activity: “in- forming the general public (and especially taxpayers) of the OTHER SOCIAL INFLUENCES relevance and importance of our work. We are convinced that this applies to even the most esoteric of ‘basic’ research, be- cause understanding how the world works is fundamental to arrangements, and improved mechanisms to disseminate both satisfying natural human curiosity and solving the hu- and utilize knowledge more quickly” http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png BioScience Oxford University Press

The Communication Process as Evaluative Context: What Do Nonscientists Hear When Scientists Speak?

BioScience, Volume 51 (6) – Jun 1, 2001

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/the-communication-process-as-evaluative-context-what-do-nonscientists-q0XwxmaREi
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© 2001 American Institute of Biological Sciences
Subject
Overview Articles
ISSN
0006-3568
eISSN
1525-3244
DOI
10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0487:TCPAEC]2.0.CO;2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Articles The Communication Process as Evaluative Context: What Do Nonscientists Hear When Scientists Speak? JAMES R. WEBER AND CHARLOTTE SCHELL WORD The cause and root of nearly all evils in science is this—that SCIENTISTS AND NONSCIENTISTS BENEFIT while we falsely admire and extol the powers of the human mind, we neglect to seek for its true helps. BY RECOGNIZING THAT ATTEMPTS AT Francis Bacon Aphorism IX, Novum Organum MUTUAL INFLUENCE, MULTIPLE FRAMES OF n the first paragraph of a letter in the “Science’s REFERENCE, AND “OBJECTIVE” INFORMA- ICompass” section of Science (Bazzaz et al. 1998), a group TION IN SCIENCE COMMUNICATION ARE of eminent ecologists notes that good science used to involve doing first-rate research and publishing it in the scientific lit- NOT NEUTRAL BUT EVALUATED WITH erature. Now, however, they note a third necessary activity: “in- forming the general public (and especially taxpayers) of the OTHER SOCIAL INFLUENCES relevance and importance of our work. We are convinced that this applies to even the most esoteric of ‘basic’ research, be- cause understanding how the world works is fundamental to arrangements, and improved mechanisms to disseminate both satisfying natural human curiosity and solving the hu- and utilize knowledge more quickly”

Journal

BioScienceOxford University Press

Published: Jun 1, 2001

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off