Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Nincic, Jennifer Ramos (2010)
Ideological structure and foreign policy preferencesJournal of Political Ideologies, 15
Vanessa Williamson, T. Skocpol, J. Coggin (2011)
The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican ConservatismPerspectives on Politics, 9
C. Dueck (2006)
Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture, and Change in American Grand Strategy
Jonathan Monten (2005)
The Roots of the Bush Doctrine: Power, Nationalism, and Democracy Promotion in U.S. StrategyInternational Security, 29
(2010)
The Tea Party’s Hawk.
S. Murray (1996)
Anchors against Change: American Opinion Leaders' Beliefs After the Cold War
(2010)
Does the Tea Party Have a Foreign Policy?
Jeffrey Legro (2005)
Rethinking the World: Great Power Strategies and International Order
William Chittick, Keith Billingsley, R. Travis (1995)
A Three-Dimensional Model of American Foreign Policy BeliefsInternational Studies Quarterly, 39
O. Holsti, J. Rosenau (1990)
The Structure of Foreign Policy Attitudes among American LeadersThe Journal of Politics, 52
Brian Rathbun (2007)
Hierarchy and Community at Home and AbroadJournal of Conflict Resolution, 51
A. Markovits (2007)
Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of the WestPerspectives on Politics, 5
W. Mead (2011)
The Tea Party and American Foreign PolicyForeign Affairs
J. Cooper (2001)
Breaking the Heart of the World: Woodrow Wilson and the Fight for the League of Nations
E. Luck (2011)
The Best Laid Plans: The Origins of American Multilateralism and the Dawn of the Cold War . By Stewart Patrick. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008. 412p. $44.95 cloth.Perspectives on Politics, 9
J. Combs (2002)
Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the WorldThe Journal of American History, 89
O. Holsti (1996)
Public opinion and American foreign policy
E. Wittkopf (1991)
Faces of Internationalism: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy
S. Murray, Jonathan Cowden (1999)
The Role of “Enemy Images” and Ideology of Elite Belief SystemsInternational Studies Quarterly, 43
M. Nincic (1997)
Domestic Costs, the U.S. Public, and the Isolationist CalculusInternational Studies Quarterly, 41
Lawrence Freedman (1978)
Perception and Misperception in International PoliticsInternational Affairs, 54
Thomas Knock (1992)
To End All Wars: Woodrow Wilson and the Quest for a New World Order
Lloyd Ambrosius (1987)
Woodrow Wilson and the American Diplomatic Tradition: The Treaty Fight in Perspective
(1995)
BILLINGSLEY, AND RICK TRAVIS
(2011)
THEDA SKOCPOL, AND JOHN COGGIN
Clay Shirky (2011)
The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political changeForeign Affairs, 90
O. Holsti, J. Rosenau (1988)
The Domestic and Foreign Policy Beliefs of American LeadersJournal of Conflict Resolution, 32
(2010)
Innocence Abroad: The Tea Party’s Search for Foreign Policy.
(2010)
How the Tea Party is Wrecking Republican Foreign Policy.
P. Pogány (2006)
Rethinking the World
David Lake (2001)
Entangling Relations: American Foreign Policy in Its Century
The Tea Party is a powerful new force in American domestic politics, but little is known about its supporters' views on foreign affairs. New survey data indicates that supporters of the Tea Party exhibit attitudes on international relations consistent with the Jacksonian tradition in American political thought but not, as some have maintained, isolationist opinions of the Jeffersonian variety. Jacksonians are supporters of a strong defense and a large military presence abroad and are opposed to Wilsonian global idealism. The article operationalizes support for these three different foreign policy traditions by connecting them to previous findings on the structure of American foreign policy. The effect of Tea Party affiliation on foreign policy attitudes is severely weakened, however, once we control for political ideology, particularly economic conservatism. As is the case in domestic politics, Tea Party sympathizers seem to be somewhat ordinary conservatives, not a completely new breed. There is a direct parallel between their domestic attitudes and their foreign policy attitudes. Their lack of support for idealistic policies abroad, their most prominent set of attitudes, is part and parcel of a lack of social solidarity indicated in their more economically libertarian position at home.
Foreign Policy Analysis – Oxford University Press
Published: Jan 9, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.