Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Gary Rudnick, Stephen Wall (1992)
The molecular mechanism of "ecstasy" [3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA)]: serotonin transporters are targets for MDMA-induced serotonin release.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89
B. Schwikowski, P. Uetz, S. Fields (2000)
A network of protein–protein interactions in yeastNature Biotechnology, 18
Cédric Merlot, D. Domine, Christophe Cleva, D. Church (2003)
Chemical substructures in drug discovery.Drug discovery today, 8 13
M. Bhasin, Gajendra Raghava (2004)
GPCRpred: an SVM-based method for prediction of families and subfamilies of G-protein coupled receptorsNucleic acids research, 32 Web Server issue
D. Wishart, Craig Knox, Anchi Guo, S. Shrivastava, Murtaza Hassanali, P. Stothard, Zhan Chang, Jennifer Woolsey (2005)
DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and explorationNucleic Acids Research, 34
S. Swamidass, Jonathan Chen, Jocelyne Bruand, Peter Phung, L. Ralaivola, P. Baldi (2005)
Kernels for small molecules and the prediction of mutagenicity, toxicity and anti-cancer activityBioinformatics, 21 Suppl 1
D. Boswell (2002)
Introduction to Support Vector Machines
K. Palczewski, T. Kumasaka, T. Hori, C. Behnke, H. Motoshima, B. Fox, I. Trong, D. Teller, T. Okada, R. Stenkamp, Masaki Yamamoto, M. Miyano (2000)
Crystal structure of rhodopsin: A G protein-coupled receptor.Science, 289 5480
T. Soga, Y. Ueno, H. Naraoka, Yoshiaki Ohashi, M. Tomita, T. Nishioka (2002)
Simultaneous determination of anionic intermediates for Bacillus subtilis metabolic pathways by capillary electrophoresis electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.Analytical chemistry, 74 10
B. Ripley, N. Hjort (1996)
Pattern recognition and neural networks
Chin-Sheng Yu, Yu‐Ching Chen, Chih-Hao Lu, Jenn-Kang Hwang (2006)
Prediction of protein subcellular localizationProteins: Structure, 64
K. Kristiansen (2004)
Molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, signaling, and regulation within the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors: molecular modeling and mutagenesis approaches to receptor structure and function.Pharmacology & therapeutics, 103 1
J. Platt (1999)
Probabilistic Outputs for Support vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods
T. Klabunde, G. Hessler (2002)
Drug Design Strategies for Targeting G‐Protein‐Coupled ReceptorsChemBioChem, 3
A. Teschendorff, Yanzhong Wang, N. Barbosa-Morais, J. Brenton, C. Caldas (2005)
A variational Bayesian mixture modelling framework for cluster analysis of gene-expression dataBioinformatics, 21 13
Alex Smola, P. Bartlett (2000)
Advances in Large Margin Classifiers
Xuan Xiao, Shihuang Shao, Zheng-De Huang, K. Chou (2006)
Using pseudo amino acid composition to predict protein structural classes: Approached with complexity measure factorJournal of Computational Chemistry, 27
S. Gomez, William Noble, A. Rzhetsky (2003)
Learning to predict protein-protein interactions from protein sequencesBioinformatics, 19 15
Yuhai Wu (2021)
Statistical Learning TheoryTechnometrics, 41
H. An, T. Peavy, J. Hedrick, C. Lebrilla (2003)
Determination of N-glycosylation sites and site heterogeneity in glycoproteins.Analytical chemistry, 75 20
G. Morris, D. Goodsell, R. Halliday, R. Huey, W. Hart, R. Belew, A. Olson (1998)
Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy functionJournal of Computational Chemistry, 19
Mathura Venkatarajan, W. Braun (2001)
New quantitative descriptors of amino acids based on multidimensional scaling of a large number of physical–chemical propertiesMolecular modeling annual, 7
G. Jones, P. Willett, R. Glen, Andrew Leach, Robin Taylor (1997)
Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.Journal of molecular biology, 267 3
V. Zernov, K. Balakin, A. Ivaschenko, N. Savchuk, I. Pletnev (2003)
Drug Discovery Using Support Vector Machines. The Case Studies of Drug-likeness, Agrochemical-likeness, and Enzyme Inhibition PredictionsJournal of chemical information and computer sciences, 43 6
R. Apweiler, A. Bairoch, Cathy Wu, W. Barker, B. Boeckmann, Serenella Ferro, E. Gasteiger, Hongzhan Huang, R. Lopez, M. Magrane, M. Martin, D. Natale, C. O’Donovan, Nicole Redaschi, L. Yeh (2004)
UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebaseNucleic acids research, 32 Database issue
M. Clark (2005)
Generalized Fragment-Substructure Based Property Prediction MethodJournal of chemical information and modeling, 45 1
Shawn Martin, D. Roe, J. Faulon (2005)
Predicting protein-protein interactions using signature productsBioinformatics, 21 2
D. Hosmer, S. Lemeshow (1991)
Applied Logistic Regression
(2004)
Mismatch string kernels for discriminative protein classification
Li Liao, William Noble (2003)
Combining Pairwise Sequence Similarity and Support Vector Machines for Detecting Remote Protein Evolutionary and Structural RelationshipsJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 10 6
Nobuyoshi Nagamine, Yu Kawada, Y. Sakakibara (2005)
Identifying cooperative transcriptional regulations using protein–protein interactionsNucleic Acids Research, 33
B. Shoichet, I. Kuntz, D. Bodian (1992)
Molecular docking using shape descriptorsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 13
D. Firth (1993)
Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimatesBiometrika, 80
J. Sprague, M. Banks, Valerie Cook, E. Mills (2003)
Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Thyroid Axis and Sympathetic Nervous System Involvement in Hyperthermia Induced by 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (Ecstasy)Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 305
Joel Bock, D. Gough (2001)
Predicting protein-protein interactions from primary structureBioinformatics, 17 5
Motivation: Prediction of interactions between proteins and chemical compounds is of great benefit in drug discovery processes. In this field, 3D structure-based methods such as docking analysis have been developed. However, the genomewide application of these methods is not really feasible as 3D structural information is limited in availability.Results: We describe a novel method for predicting protein–chemical interaction using SVM. We utilize very general protein data, i.e. amino acid sequences, and combine these with chemical structures and mass spectrometry (MS) data. MS data can be of great use in finding new chemical compounds in the future. We assessed the validity of our method in the dataset of the binding of existing drugs and found that more than 80% accuracy could be obtained. Furthermore, we conducted comprehensive target protein predictions for MDMA, and validated the biological significance of our method by successfully finding proteins relevant to its known functions.Availability: Available on request from the authors.Contact: [email protected] information: Appendix–technical details of method, Supplementary Table 1–7 and Supplementary Figure 1.
Bioinformatics – Oxford University Press
Published: May 17, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.