Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Stampede to judgement: persuasive influence and herding behavior by courts

Stampede to judgement: persuasive influence and herding behavior by courts We model appeals courts as Bayesian decision makers with private information about a supreme court's interpretation of the law; each court also observes the previous decisions of other appeals courts in similar cases. Such 'persuasive influence' can cause 'herding' behavior by later appeals courts as decisions progressively rely more on previous decisions and less on a court's private information. We provide an example drawn from a recent United States Supreme Court decision finding unconstitutional a basic provision of a law previously found constitutional by six circuit courts. Herding on the wrong decision may remain uncorrected, since review of harmonious decisions is rare. Oxford University Press « Previous | Next Article » Table of Contents This Article Am Law Econ Rev (1999) 1 (1): 158-189. doi: 10.1093/aler/1.1.158 » Abstract Free Full Text (PDF) Free Classifications Article Services Article metrics Alert me when cited Alert me if corrected Find similar articles Similar articles in Web of Science Add to my archive Download citation Request Permissions Citing Articles Load citing article information Citing articles via CrossRef Citing articles via Scopus Citing articles via Web of Science Citing articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Daughety, A. Articles by Reinganum, J. Search for related content Related Content K41 - Litigation Process Load related web page information Share Email this article CiteULike Delicious Facebook Google+ Mendeley Twitter What's this? Search this journal: Advanced » Current Issue Fall 2015 17 (2) Alert me to new issues The Journal About this journal Rights & Permissions Dispatch date of the next issue We are mobile – find out more Journals Career Network Published on behalf of The American Law and Economics Association Impact Factor: 0.735 5-Yr impact factor: 0.929 Editors-in-Chief Max Schanzenbach Northwestern University School of Law Abraham Wickelgren University of Texas at Austin View full editorial board For Authors Information for authors Author Self-Archiving Policy Submit now! Corporate Services Advertising sales Reprints Supplements Alerting Services Email table of contents Email Advance Access CiteTrack XML RSS feed Widget Get a widget var taxonomies = ("LAW00010", "SOC00720"); Most Most Read Crime and Expected Punishment: Changes in Perceptions at the Age of Criminal Majority Understanding the Democratic Transition in South Africa Does the "Community Prosecution" Strategy Reduce Crime? A Test of Chicago's Experience Prison Conditions and Recidivism Medical Marijuana Laws and Teen Marijuana Use » View all Most Read articles Most Cited Prison Conditions, Capital Punishment, and Deterrence Does Capital Punishment Have a Deterrent Effect? New Evidence from Postmoratorium Panel Data Do Harsher Prison Conditions Reduce Recidivism? A Discontinuity-based Approach The Black-White Test Score Gap Through Third Grade Capitalizing on Segregation, Pretending Neutrality: College Admissions and the Texas Top 10% Law » View all Most Cited articles Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department. Online ISSN 1465-7260 - Print ISSN 1465-7252 Copyright © 2015 American Law and Economics Association Oxford Journals Oxford University Press Site Map Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal Notices Frequently Asked Questions Other Oxford University Press sites: Oxford University Press Oxford Journals China Oxford Journals Japan Academic & Professional books Children's & Schools Books Dictionaries & Reference Dictionary of National Biography Digital Reference English Language Teaching Higher Education Textbooks International Education Unit Law Medicine Music Online Products & Publishing Oxford Bibliographies Online Oxford Dictionaries Online Oxford English Dictionary Oxford Language Dictionaries Online Oxford Scholarship Online Reference Rights and Permissions Resources for Retailers & Wholesalers Resources for the Healthcare Industry Very Short Introductions World's Classics function fnc_onDomLoaded() { var query_context = getQueryContext(); PF_initOIUnderbar(query_context,":QS:default","","JRN"); PF_insertOIUnderbar(0); }; if (window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', fnc_onDomLoaded, false); } else if (window.attachEvent) { window.attachEvent('onload', fnc_onDomLoaded); } var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-189672-16"); pageTracker._setDomainName(".oxfordjournals.org"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {} http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Law and Economics Review Oxford University Press

Stampede to judgement: persuasive influence and herding behavior by courts

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/stampede-to-judgement-persuasive-influence-and-herding-behavior-by-s3ZSllmYG6

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 American Law and Economics Association
ISSN
1465-7252
eISSN
1465-7260
DOI
10.1093/aler/1.1.158
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We model appeals courts as Bayesian decision makers with private information about a supreme court's interpretation of the law; each court also observes the previous decisions of other appeals courts in similar cases. Such 'persuasive influence' can cause 'herding' behavior by later appeals courts as decisions progressively rely more on previous decisions and less on a court's private information. We provide an example drawn from a recent United States Supreme Court decision finding unconstitutional a basic provision of a law previously found constitutional by six circuit courts. Herding on the wrong decision may remain uncorrected, since review of harmonious decisions is rare. Oxford University Press « Previous | Next Article » Table of Contents This Article Am Law Econ Rev (1999) 1 (1): 158-189. doi: 10.1093/aler/1.1.158 » Abstract Free Full Text (PDF) Free Classifications Article Services Article metrics Alert me when cited Alert me if corrected Find similar articles Similar articles in Web of Science Add to my archive Download citation Request Permissions Citing Articles Load citing article information Citing articles via CrossRef Citing articles via Scopus Citing articles via Web of Science Citing articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Daughety, A. Articles by Reinganum, J. Search for related content Related Content K41 - Litigation Process Load related web page information Share Email this article CiteULike Delicious Facebook Google+ Mendeley Twitter What's this? Search this journal: Advanced » Current Issue Fall 2015 17 (2) Alert me to new issues The Journal About this journal Rights & Permissions Dispatch date of the next issue We are mobile – find out more Journals Career Network Published on behalf of The American Law and Economics Association Impact Factor: 0.735 5-Yr impact factor: 0.929 Editors-in-Chief Max Schanzenbach Northwestern University School of Law Abraham Wickelgren University of Texas at Austin View full editorial board For Authors Information for authors Author Self-Archiving Policy Submit now! Corporate Services Advertising sales Reprints Supplements Alerting Services Email table of contents Email Advance Access CiteTrack XML RSS feed Widget Get a widget var taxonomies = ("LAW00010", "SOC00720"); Most Most Read Crime and Expected Punishment: Changes in Perceptions at the Age of Criminal Majority Understanding the Democratic Transition in South Africa Does the "Community Prosecution" Strategy Reduce Crime? A Test of Chicago's Experience Prison Conditions and Recidivism Medical Marijuana Laws and Teen Marijuana Use » View all Most Read articles Most Cited Prison Conditions, Capital Punishment, and Deterrence Does Capital Punishment Have a Deterrent Effect? New Evidence from Postmoratorium Panel Data Do Harsher Prison Conditions Reduce Recidivism? A Discontinuity-based Approach The Black-White Test Score Gap Through Third Grade Capitalizing on Segregation, Pretending Neutrality: College Admissions and the Texas Top 10% Law » View all Most Cited articles Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department. Online ISSN 1465-7260 - Print ISSN 1465-7252 Copyright © 2015 American Law and Economics Association Oxford Journals Oxford University Press Site Map Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal Notices Frequently Asked Questions Other Oxford University Press sites: Oxford University Press Oxford Journals China Oxford Journals Japan Academic & Professional books Children's & Schools Books Dictionaries & Reference Dictionary of National Biography Digital Reference English Language Teaching Higher Education Textbooks International Education Unit Law Medicine Music Online Products & Publishing Oxford Bibliographies Online Oxford Dictionaries Online Oxford English Dictionary Oxford Language Dictionaries Online Oxford Scholarship Online Reference Rights and Permissions Resources for Retailers & Wholesalers Resources for the Healthcare Industry Very Short Introductions World's Classics function fnc_onDomLoaded() { var query_context = getQueryContext(); PF_initOIUnderbar(query_context,":QS:default","","JRN"); PF_insertOIUnderbar(0); }; if (window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', fnc_onDomLoaded, false); } else if (window.attachEvent) { window.attachEvent('onload', fnc_onDomLoaded); } var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-189672-16"); pageTracker._setDomainName(".oxfordjournals.org"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {}

Journal

American Law and Economics ReviewOxford University Press

Published: Jan 1, 1999

There are no references for this article.