Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Bağcı Bağcı (1991)
Türkiye’nin NATO Üyeliğini Hızlandıran İki Önemli Faktör: Kore Savaşı Ve ABD Büyükelçisi George Mcghee (Two factors that eased Turkey’s entry into NATO: The Korean War and the US Ambassador George McGhee)ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 18
Shibley Telhami, M. Barnett (2002)
Identity and foreign policy in the Middle East
W. Yale, George Lenczowski (1953)
The Middle East in World AffairsThe American Historical Review, 58
Jutta Weldes, Diana Saco (1996)
Making State Action Possible: The United States and the Discursive Construction of 'The Cuban Problem', 1960-1994Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 25
R. Doty (1993)
Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the PhilippinesInternational Studies Quarterly, 37
Jutta Weldes (1999)
Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis
D. Barlas (1998)
Etatism and Diplomacy in Turkey
Selim Deringil (1989)
Turkish foreign policy during the Second World War : an active neutrality
J. Hurewitz (1975)
The Middle East and North Africa in world politics : a documentary record
Mustafa Bilgin, Steven Morewood (2004)
Turkey's reliance on Britain: British political and diplomatic support for Turkey against Soviet demands, 1943–47Middle Eastern Studies, 40
ÜLman ÜLman, Sander Sander (1972)
Türk Dış Politikasına Yön Veren Etkenler (Factors Shaping Turkey’s Foreign Policy)Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 27
R. Trask, Harry Howard (1975)
Turkey, the Straits and U.S. PolicyPolitical Science Quarterly, 81
R. Kerner (1929)
Russia, the Straits, and Constantinople, 1914-15The Journal of Modern History, 1
Pinar Bilgin (2009)
Securing Turkey through western-oriented foreign policyNew Perspectives on Turkey, 40
Jutta Weldes (1996)
Constructing National InterestsEuropean Journal of International Relations, 2
C. Smith (1965)
Great Britain and the 1914-1915 Straits Agreement with Russia: The British Promise of November 1914The American Historical Review, 70
G. Mcghee (1990)
The US-Turkish-NATO Middle East Connection: How the Truman Doctrine and Turkey's NATO Entry Contained the Soviets
Michael Shapiro (1990)
Strategic Discourse/Discursive Strategy: The Representation of “Security Policy” in the Video AgeInternational Studies Quarterly, 34
S. Kucherov (1949)
The Problem of Constantinople and the StraitsThe Russian Review, 8
Metin Tamkoç (1972)
Bridge across the Bosporus: The Foreign Policy of Turkey.American Journal of International Law, 66
M. Barnett (1999)
Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change:European Journal of International Relations, 5
Cemil Bilsel (1947)
The Turkish Straits in the Light of Recent Turkish-Soviet Russian CorrespondenceAmerican Journal of International Law, 41
A. Keenan, Michael Shapiro (1989)
The politics of representation : writing practices in biography, photography, and policy analysisMln, 104
R. Putnam (1988)
Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level gamesInternational Organization, 42
Y. Güçlü (2002)
The Uneasy Relationship: Turkey's Foreign Policy vis-a-vis the Soviet Union at the Outbreak of the Second World WarMediterranean Quarterly, 13
H. Dinerstein, Harish Kapur (1968)
Soviet Russia and Asia, 1917-1927 : a study of Soviet policy towards Turkey, Iran and AfghanistanThe American Historical Review, 73
J. Campbell, G. Mcghee (1990)
The US-Turkish-NATO Middle East ConnectionForeign Affairs, 69
Barnett Barnett (1999)
Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s Road to OsloEuropean Journal of International Relations, 5
D. Sezer (1981)
Turkey's security policies: Introduction, 21
V. Hudson, Christopher Vore (1995)
Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and TomorrowMershon International Studies Review, 39
V. Kubálková (2001)
Foreign Policy in a Constructed World
J. Huysmans (1998)
Security! What Do You Mean?European Journal of International Relations, 4
Huysmans Huysmans (1998)
Security! What Do You Mean? From Concept to Thick SignifierEuropean Journal of International Relations, 4
D. Sezer (1981)
Turkey's security policies
Standard accounts on Turkey’s foreign policy identify Molotov’s communication of 1945 (better known as “Stalin’s demands”) as the catalyst behind Turkey’s post‐WWII decision to strain its relations with the USSR and turn to the United States (US) for defense support. The aim here is to complement these accounts which have stressed the military and ideological threat posed by the USSR as the catalyst behind Turkey’s foreign policy change, by offering an analysis that explores the conditions of possibility for such change. The aim here is not to question the seriousness of the risks involved in failing to stand firm against the USSR in the immediate post‐WWII period. Nor is it to dispute the appropriateness of Turkey’s search for “Western” allies at a time when its economic, political and military vulnerabilities were acknowledged by friend and foe alike. The following mediates through accounts that stress the military threat and those that emphasize the ideological threat and presents an analysis that looks into the production of representations of the USSR as a “threat” to Turkey and the context which allowed for the production of such representations of the USSR.
Foreign Policy Analysis – Oxford University Press
Published: Jan 1, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.