Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Special Issue: Law, Justice and the Security Gap

Special Issue: Law, Justice and the Security Gap Journal of Conflict & Security Law  Oxford University Press 2015; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com doi:10.1093/jcsl/krv016 Advance Access published on 31 October 2015 ... ....... ...... ....... ....... ...... ....... ....... ...... ....... ....... . y z x Christine Chinkin*, Mary Kaldor , Iavor Rangelov andSharonWeill Introduction The world is in the midst of a profound change in the way that security is conceptualised and practiced. Up until 1989, security was largely viewed either as ‘internal security’ or as ‘national’ or ‘bloc’ security and the main in- struments of security were considered to be the police, the intelligence services and the military. This traditional view of security fits uneasily with the far- reaching changes in social and political organisation that characterise the world at the beginning of the 21st century. What we call the ‘security gap’ refers to the gap between our national and international security capabilities, largely based on conventional military forces, and the reality of the everyday experience of insecurity in different parts of the world. To some extent, public security capabilities are beginning to adapt to the changing nature of insecurity—with new doctrines or new military–civilian capabilities. But it is also the http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Conflict and Security Law Oxford University Press

Special Issue: Law, Justice and the Security Gap

Download PDF
7 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/special-issue-law-justice-and-the-security-gap-YmbFSKRNd6

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© Oxford University Press 2015; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com
ISSN
1467-7954
eISSN
1467-7962
DOI
10.1093/jcsl/krv016
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Journal of Conflict & Security Law  Oxford University Press 2015; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com doi:10.1093/jcsl/krv016 Advance Access published on 31 October 2015 ... ....... ...... ....... ....... ...... ....... ....... ...... ....... ....... . y z x Christine Chinkin*, Mary Kaldor , Iavor Rangelov andSharonWeill Introduction The world is in the midst of a profound change in the way that security is conceptualised and practiced. Up until 1989, security was largely viewed either as ‘internal security’ or as ‘national’ or ‘bloc’ security and the main in- struments of security were considered to be the police, the intelligence services and the military. This traditional view of security fits uneasily with the far- reaching changes in social and political organisation that characterise the world at the beginning of the 21st century. What we call the ‘security gap’ refers to the gap between our national and international security capabilities, largely based on conventional military forces, and the reality of the everyday experience of insecurity in different parts of the world. To some extent, public security capabilities are beginning to adapt to the changing nature of insecurity—with new doctrines or new military–civilian capabilities. But it is also the

Journal

Journal of Conflict and Security Law – Oxford University Press

Published: Apr 1, 2016

There are no references for this article.