Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1986)
Delegated Expertise
J. Banks, J. Sobel (1987)
Equilibrium Selection in Signaling GamesEconometrica, 55
Joseph Farrell (1985)
Credible Neologisms in Games of Communication
A. Rubinstein (1985)
A BARGAINING MODEL WITH INCOMPLETE INFORMATION ABOUT TIME PREFERENCESEconometrica, 53
V. Crawford, J. Sobel (1982)
STRATEGIC INFORMATION TRANSMISSIONEconometrica, 50
In-Koo Cho (1987)
A Refinement of Sequential EquilibriumEconometrica, 55
R. Myerson (1978)
Refinements of the Nash equilibrium conceptInternational Journal of Game Theory, 7
E. Kohlberg, J. Mertens (1986)
ON THE STRATEGIC STABILITY OF EQUILIBRIAEconometrica, 54
(1985)
although his analysis takes place in a setting in which messages are free. 16. It is also worth noting that the example of subsection IV.5 is an unstable equilibrium that Grossman and Perry accept
Paul Milgrom, John Roberts (1982)
LIMIT PRICING AND ENTRY UNDER INCOMPLETE INFORMATION: AN EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS'Econometrica, 50
David Kreps, Robert Wilson (1982)
Reputation and imperfect informationJournal of Economic Theory, 27
(1979)
Informational Equilibrium," Econometrica
Sanford Grossman, Motty Perry (1986)
Sequential Bargaining Under Asymmetric InformationWharton School: Finance (Topic)
A. McLennan (1985)
Justifiable Beliefs in Sequential EquilibriumEconometrica, 53
Sanford Grossman (1981)
The Informational Role of Warranties and Private Disclosure about Product QualityThe Journal of Law and Economics, 24
R. Aumann (1987)
Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of Bayesian Rationality Author ( s )
In-Koo Cho (1986)
Refinement of sequential equilibrium : theory and application
Abstract Games in which one party conveys private information to a second through messages typically admit large numbers of sequential equilibria, as the second party may entertain a wealth of beliefs in response to out-of-equilibrium messages. By restricting those out-of-equilibrium beliefs, one can sometimes eliminate many unintuitive equilibria. We present a number of formal restrictions of this sort, investigate their behavior in specific examples, and relate these restrictions to Kohlberg and Mertens' notion of stability. * " We are grateful to Anat Admati, Drew Fudenberg, Elon Kohlberg, Paul Milgrom, Richard McKelvey, Jean-Francois Mertens, Motty Perry, John Roberts, Joel Sobel, Gyu Ho Wang, and especially Hugo Sonnenschein for helpful discussion, and to three referees and an editor for helpful suggestions. The financial support of Harvard University, the Korea Foundation for Advanced Studies, the National Science Foundation (Grants SES80-06407 and SES84-05865), the Sloan Foundation, and the Institute for Advanced Studies at the Hebrew University, are all gratefully acknowledged. The material in this paper originally appeared in two separate papers, one with the above title, and a second entitled “More Signaling Games and Stable Equilibria.” We hope that anachronistic references to the earlier incarnations of these ideas will not prove too troublesome to the reader. This content is only available as a PDF. © 1987 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
The Quarterly Journal of Economics – Oxford University Press
Published: May 1, 1987
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.