Saints and Monsters in Medieval French and Occitan Literature: Sublime and Abject Bodies. By Huw Grange

Saints and Monsters in Medieval French and Occitan Literature: Sublime and Abject Bodies. By Huw... This study of hagiography, characterized by Huw Grange’s wit and brightness throughout, opens with comparisons of saints to comic-book superheroes, as pagan persecutors are made the horrible villains of the piece. Such sublime and abject bodies provide inimitable models, although we are in some sense enjoined to try to repeat the stories by acting as good Christians. The author moves with an impressive lightness of touch across a huge range of versions of four saints’ lives — those of Margaret, George, Honorat, and Enimia — covering verse and prose, and Latin, French, and Occitan, in mostly unpublished manuscript versions. That Grange manages this in a relatively short book, without making the readings trivial, represents a considerable accomplishment. His method involves surveying the main differences between versions, focusing on how they figure the sublime and the abject dimensions of saintly scenarios. Saints transcend their physical bodies to varying degrees, and there is vacillation about the corporeality of dragons: are they in some sense material beings, or just manifestations of evil? The ‘Saracens’, too, are by turns cast as humans convertible to Christianity and as absolutely irrecoverable others, the latter pole feeding fantasies of their annihilation. Grange’s broad engagement with theories of the body, of time, of kinship, and of community remains critical throughout; he seeks to show the limits of modern philosophical concepts, highlighting in particular blind spots concerning the question of agency in Kristeva’s abject, as well as her awkward theoretical leaps from psyche to polis. Another focus lies on ‘asynchronies’ (multiple time zones), a concept inspired by Carolyn Dinshaw’s work, which Grange develops as a useful alternative to the idea of anachronisms. Hagiography often troubles narrative chronology suggesting, for example, that the existence of timeless conflicts makes third-century Rome and the First Crusade assimilable realities. Everywhere and at every stage of history, there are ‘Saracens’, in different forms, to be confronted. Grange also convincingly articulates the importance of different concerns in each work. Margaret’s tale, across various retellings, deals with gender, questioning the naturalization of women’s bodies as maternal and allowing for different physical potentials; whereas the lives of Enimia, who abandons the court to embrace a life of leprosy and rocky wilderness, reveal the cultural contingency of the zone between the two deaths, which here vehicles an Occitan protest against French royal power. Gévaudan, her place of exile, is a fully fledged community defined by opposition to the barbarous realm of France, apparently the last to convert to Christianity. George’s narrative raises questions about the interaction between cosmopolitanism and identitarian groupings, and, lastly, Honorat, through his repeatedly refigured familial ties to his cultic community, invites consideration of queer kinship, whilst his miracles work to make families more functional, straightening out ancestral genealogy in the temporal sphere. A final key concern of Grange’s is the material links of texts to communities. Hagiographies frequently exhort readers to carry the text around for protection, and many modern readers will find this book a kindly and insightful companion during their explorations of the genre. © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for French Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices) http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png French Studies Oxford University Press

Saints and Monsters in Medieval French and Occitan Literature: Sublime and Abject Bodies. By Huw Grange

French Studies , Volume 72 (3) – Jul 1, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/saints-and-monsters-in-medieval-french-and-occitan-literature-sublime-AAPm4ucUyJ
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for French Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
ISSN
0016-1128
eISSN
1468-2931
D.O.I.
10.1093/fs/kny133
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study of hagiography, characterized by Huw Grange’s wit and brightness throughout, opens with comparisons of saints to comic-book superheroes, as pagan persecutors are made the horrible villains of the piece. Such sublime and abject bodies provide inimitable models, although we are in some sense enjoined to try to repeat the stories by acting as good Christians. The author moves with an impressive lightness of touch across a huge range of versions of four saints’ lives — those of Margaret, George, Honorat, and Enimia — covering verse and prose, and Latin, French, and Occitan, in mostly unpublished manuscript versions. That Grange manages this in a relatively short book, without making the readings trivial, represents a considerable accomplishment. His method involves surveying the main differences between versions, focusing on how they figure the sublime and the abject dimensions of saintly scenarios. Saints transcend their physical bodies to varying degrees, and there is vacillation about the corporeality of dragons: are they in some sense material beings, or just manifestations of evil? The ‘Saracens’, too, are by turns cast as humans convertible to Christianity and as absolutely irrecoverable others, the latter pole feeding fantasies of their annihilation. Grange’s broad engagement with theories of the body, of time, of kinship, and of community remains critical throughout; he seeks to show the limits of modern philosophical concepts, highlighting in particular blind spots concerning the question of agency in Kristeva’s abject, as well as her awkward theoretical leaps from psyche to polis. Another focus lies on ‘asynchronies’ (multiple time zones), a concept inspired by Carolyn Dinshaw’s work, which Grange develops as a useful alternative to the idea of anachronisms. Hagiography often troubles narrative chronology suggesting, for example, that the existence of timeless conflicts makes third-century Rome and the First Crusade assimilable realities. Everywhere and at every stage of history, there are ‘Saracens’, in different forms, to be confronted. Grange also convincingly articulates the importance of different concerns in each work. Margaret’s tale, across various retellings, deals with gender, questioning the naturalization of women’s bodies as maternal and allowing for different physical potentials; whereas the lives of Enimia, who abandons the court to embrace a life of leprosy and rocky wilderness, reveal the cultural contingency of the zone between the two deaths, which here vehicles an Occitan protest against French royal power. Gévaudan, her place of exile, is a fully fledged community defined by opposition to the barbarous realm of France, apparently the last to convert to Christianity. George’s narrative raises questions about the interaction between cosmopolitanism and identitarian groupings, and, lastly, Honorat, through his repeatedly refigured familial ties to his cultic community, invites consideration of queer kinship, whilst his miracles work to make families more functional, straightening out ancestral genealogy in the temporal sphere. A final key concern of Grange’s is the material links of texts to communities. Hagiographies frequently exhort readers to carry the text around for protection, and many modern readers will find this book a kindly and insightful companion during their explorations of the genre. © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for French Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices)

Journal

French StudiesOxford University Press

Published: Jul 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off