Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis

Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis Baron and Kenny’s procedure for determining if an independent variable affects a dependent variable through some mediator is so well known that it is used by authors and requested by reviewers almost reflexively. Many research projects have been terminated early in a research program or later in the review process because the data did not conform to Baron and Kenny’s criteria, impeding theoretical development. While the technical literature has disputed some of Baron and Kenny’s tests, this literature has not diffused to practicing researchers. We present a nontechnical summary of the flaws in the Baron and Kenny logic, some of which have not been previously noted. We provide a decision tree and a step-by-step procedure for testing mediation, classifying its type, and interpreting the implications of findings for theory building and future research. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Consumer Research Oxford University Press

Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/reconsidering-baron-and-kenny-myths-and-truths-about-mediation-0rx8C2kzQQ

References (40)

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© 2010 by Journal of Consumer Research, Inc.
ISSN
0093-5301
eISSN
1537-5277
DOI
10.1086/651257
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Baron and Kenny’s procedure for determining if an independent variable affects a dependent variable through some mediator is so well known that it is used by authors and requested by reviewers almost reflexively. Many research projects have been terminated early in a research program or later in the review process because the data did not conform to Baron and Kenny’s criteria, impeding theoretical development. While the technical literature has disputed some of Baron and Kenny’s tests, this literature has not diffused to practicing researchers. We present a nontechnical summary of the flaws in the Baron and Kenny logic, some of which have not been previously noted. We provide a decision tree and a step-by-step procedure for testing mediation, classifying its type, and interpreting the implications of findings for theory building and future research.

Journal

Journal of Consumer ResearchOxford University Press

Published: Aug 1, 2010

There are no references for this article.