Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
O. Lau (1997)
The Effectiveness of 0.7% Oxygen to Attenuate Scald Symptoms in `Delicious' Apples is Influenced by Harvest Maturity and Cultivar StrainJournal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 122
(1975)
Effect of short - term high CO 2 treatment on storage response of ' d ' Anjou ' pears
(1985)
Harvest guide for B.C. apples
(1984)
Watercore
R. Hagenmaier, P. Shaw (1992)
Gas Permeability of Fruit Coating WaxesJournal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 117
E. Kupferman (2003)
CONTROLLED ATMOSPHERE STORAGE OF APPLES AND PEARS
(1994)
Edible coatings for fresh fruits and vegetables : past , present , and future
C. Larrigaudière, Irene Lentheric, M. Vendrell (1998)
Relationship between enzymatic browning and internal disorders in controlled‐atmosphere stored pearsJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 78
E. Hansen, W. Mellenthin (1979)
Commercial handling and storage practices for winter pears
Cassandra Amarante, N. Banks (2010)
Postharvest Physiology and Quality of Coated Fruits and Vegetables
(2005)
Fruit fluorescence
J. Deell, R. Prange, D. Murr (1998)
Chlorophyll fluorescence techniques to detect atmospheric stress in stored apples
R. Soliva-Fortuny, Marc Ricart-Coll, O. Martín‐Belloso (2005)
Sensory quality and internal atmosphere of fresh‐cut Golden Delicious applesInternational Journal of Food Science and Technology, 40
(1988)
Effects of simulated shelf - life conditions on consumer acceptance and weight loss in ' Clapp ' s Favorite ' , ' Bartlett ' , ' Flemish Beauty ' and ' Anjou ' pears
A. Zanella (2003)
Control of apple superficial scald and ripening: a comparison between 1-methylcyclopropene and diphenylamine postharvest treatments, initial low oxygen stress and ultra low oxygen storagePostharvest Biology and Technology, 27
J. Bai, J. Mattheis, N. Reed (2006)
Re-initiating softening ability of 1-methylcyclopropene-treated ‘Bartlett’ and ‘d’Anjou’ pears after regular air or controlled atmosphere storageThe Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 81
飯野 久栄, 伊坂 孝, 溝延 正夫, 蔀 花雄 (1967)
白肉桃の Controlled Atmosphere 貯蔵
I. Agar, W. Biasi, E. Mitcham (1999)
Exogenous ethylene accelerates ripening responses in Bartlett pears regardless of maturity or growing regionPostharvest Biology and Technology, 17
O. Lau, C. Barden, S. Blankenship, Paul Chen, E. Curry, J. Deell, L. Lehman-Salada, E. Mitcham, R. Prange, C. Watkins (1998)
A North American cooperative survey of `Starkrimson Delicious' apple responses to 0.7% O2 storage on superficial scald and other disordersPostharvest Biology and Technology, 13
Charlie Embree, M. Myra (2007)
Effect of Blossom Density and Crop Load on Growth, Fruit Quality, and Return Bloom in 'Honeycrisp' AppleHortscience, 42
(1998)
Determination of maturity for long - term storage of apples
(2007)
Postharvest handling of winter pears
P. Toivonen (1997)
Non-ethylene, non-respiratory volatiles in harvested fruits and vegetables: their occurrence, biological activity and controlPostharvest Biology and Technology, 12
(1982)
Effects of initial low 02 stress treatments in low oxygen modified atmosphere storage of 'Granny Smith' apples
P. Chen, D. Richardson, W. Mellenthin (1982)
Differences in Biochemical Composition between ‘Beurre d’Anjou’ and ‘Bose’ Pears during Fruit Development and Storage1Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science
C. Amarante (1998)
Gas exchange, ripening behaviour and postharvest quality of coated pears : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Postharvest Physiology and Technology at Massey University, New Zealand
(1983)
Effects of storage procedures and low oxygen and high carbon dioxide atmospheres
E. Sisler, M. Serek (1997)
Inhibitors of ethylene responses in plants at the receptor level: Recent developmentsPhysiologia Plantarum, 100
(1997)
Effects of chilling
C. Wang (1985)
Ethylene, ACC, Soluble Polyuronide, and Cell Wall Noncellulosic Neutral Sugar Content in ‘Eldorado’ Pears during Cold Storage and RipeningJournal of the American Society for Horticultural Science
(1999)
Ethylene scrubbing offers no firmness and scald benefits to ' Golden Delicious , ' ' Delicious , ' and ' Spartan ' apples in low - oxygen storage
Y. Ueda, J. Bai, H. Yoshioka (1993)
Effects of Polyethylene Packaging on Flavor Retention and Volatile Production of 'Starking Delicious' AppleJournal of The Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 62
J. Bai, R. Hagenmaier, E. Baldwin (2003)
Coating selection for ‘Delicious’ and other applesPostharvest Biology and Technology, 28
(1996)
Optimum harvest date for different apple cultivars in the ' Bodensee ' area
(2006)
The use of 1 - methylcyclopropane ( 1 - MCP ) on fruits and vegetables
J. Delong, R. Prange, P. Harrison (2007)
CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE-BASED LOW-O2 CA STORAGE OF ORGANIC 'CORTLAND' AND 'DELICIOUS' APPLES
(1997)
CA regimes for control of superficial scald of 'd'Anjou' pears
(1997)
Advances in modified atmosphere packaging ( MAP ) of fresh produce
P. Chen, R. Spotts (2005)
Changes in Ripening Behaviors of 1-MCP-Treated ‘d’Anjou' Pears After StorageInternational Journal of Fruit Science, 5
J. Bai, R. Hagenmaier, E. Baldwin (2002)
Volatile response of four apple varieties with different coatings during marketing at room temperature.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 50 26
D. Greene (2005)
Time of Aminoethoxyvinylglycine Application Influences Preharvest Drop and Fruit Quality of 'McIntosh' ApplesHortscience, 40
R. Byers (1997)
Effects of Aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) on Preharvest Fruit Drop and Maturity of ‘Delicious’ Apples, 2
Xuetong Fan, S. Blankenship, J. Mattheis (1999)
1-Methylcyclopropene Inhibits Apple RipeningJournal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 124
R. Prange, J. Delong, P. Harrison (2005)
QUALITY MANAGEMENT THROUGH RESPIRATION CONTROL: IS THERE A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOWEST ACCEPTABLE RESPIRATION, CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE AND CYTOPLASMIC ACIDOSIS?
R. Prange, J. Delong, J. Daniels-Lake, P. Harrison (2005)
Innovation in controlled atmosphere technology
(1997)
Management of Gala, Braeburn, and Fuji for quality
J. Mattheis (2008)
How 1-Methylcyclopropene Has Altered the Washington State Apple IndustryHortscience, 43
A. Brody (2005)
Whats fresh about fresh-cutFood Technology, 59
R. Prange, J. Delong, Jerry Leyte, P. Harrison (2002)
Oxygen concentration affects chlorophyll fluorescence in chlorophyll-containing fruitPostharvest Biology and Technology, 24
K. Maxwell, G. Johnson (2000)
Chlorophyll fluorescence--a practical guide.Journal of experimental botany, 51 345
S. Porritt (1964)
THE EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON POSTHARVEST PHYSIOLOGY AND STORAGE LIFE OF PEARSCanadian Journal of Plant Science, 44
J. Delong, R. Prange, P. Harrison (2004)
The influence of pre-storage delayed cooling on quality and disorder incidence in ‘Honeycrisp’ apple fruit ☆Postharvest Biology and Technology, 33
J. Deell, R. Prange, D. Murr (1995)
Chlorophyll Fluorescence as a Potential Indicator of Controlled-atmosphere Disorders in 'Marshall' McIntosh ApplesHortscience, 30
(2007)
Honeycrisp' " apples
R. Veltman, J. Verschoor, J. Dugteren (2003)
Dynamic control system (DCS) for apples (Malus domestica Borkh. cv 'Elstar'): optimal quality through storage based on product responsePostharvest Biology and Technology, 27
(1998)
Variability in 02, CO2 and H2O transmission rates among commercial polyethylene films for modified atmosphere packaging
(1998)
Postharvest applied chemicals to pears: a survey of pear packers in Washington, Oregon and California
N. Banks, B. Dadzie, D. Cleland (1993)
Reducing gas exchange of fruits with surface coatingsPostharvest Biology and Technology, 3
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/amt/article-abstract/22/1/26/4639737 by DeepDyve user on 21 July 2020 26 Arthropod Management Tests, Vol. 22 A: POME FRUITS in a RCB design, separated by unsprayed buffer trees, and replicated twice in each orchard. All materials were applied on a 3-spray schedule, at 1st hatch (2 Jul), mid-hatch (16 Jul), and on 29 Jul. Check plots were not sprayed with insecticides during the test. Summer populations of larvae were compared by examining 20-50 growing terminals on each tree for live larvae on 9-11 Jul and again on 23-2 4 Jul. Fruit damage from the 1st summer generation of larvae was estimated initially on 1-2 Jul and again on 20-2 4 Aug by sampling up to 100 apples from each tree. At harvest (4 Oct for the 'Rome ' applies in the Nesbit Orchard and 14-15 Oct for the Tdared' applies in the Brown Orchard), up to 100 applies were sampled from each tree and OBLR damaged fruit was classified according to USDA grading standards into the categories of "Fancy", #1 , and culls. The standard materials, Lorsban and Dipel, were generally the most effective treatments in reducing larval infestations in growing terminals. OBLR fruit damage at harvest was much higher in the Brown orchard (49.5%) than in the Nesbitt orchard (19.4%), but the levels of control obtained in the var ious treatments were similar at the 2 locations. None of the new compounds tested were any more effective in protecting fruit from OBLR damage than the 2 standard materials, Dipel and Lorsban. Th e D F formulation of Dipel was slightly more effective in preventing fruit damage than the 2X formulation, although the differences between the 2 products were not significant. The higher rates of CM-001 were slightly more effective than the lower dosages in protecting fruit at harvest. BROWN ORCHARD % Damaged Fruit % Fruit in Different Categories at Harvest ) Infested Terminals Amt. form/100 gal 9 Jul 24 Jul 1 Aug 20 Aug clean Fancy #1 Culls Treatment 30.0ab 2.9abc 93.0fghi 1.5ab 3.0abc 2.5abc Dipel 2X 10.0 oz 22.0abc 1.5a 16.0ab 22.0a 0.6a 2.5ab 97.0i 1.0a 1.5ab 0.5a Dipel DF IO.OO Z Mattch L 32.0 oz 32.0abcd 48.0abcde 4.7ab 10.9cd 77.0bcd 6.0cde 7.5bc 9.5cd 32.0 oz 44.0cd 72.0ef 6.2ab 14.5de 68.0ab 9.0de 8.0c 15.0d MVP-2 32.0 oz 28.0 abed 40.0abcd 2.0a 3.2abc 81.5bcdef 9.0de 4.0abc 5.5abc M/C 2.4 oz 62.0cde 3.7ab 10.9cde 70.8bc 6.9cde 6.9bc 15.4d Compound A 20.0abc Compound A 3.5 oz 22.0abc 50.0abcde 4.3ab 12.5bcd 79.1bcde 7.0cde 3.5abc 10.4cd 10.8 oz 52.0bcde 3.2ab 5.4bcd 89.5defghi 5.5cd 2.5abc 2.5abc Larvin 3.2 SC 18.0abc 4.5ab 2.5abc CM-001 SC 95.0 mis 12.0a 70.0def 4.3bc 83.5cdefg 6.5cde 7.5bc 5.0bcd 89.5defghi 3.0bc 4.5abc 3.0abc CM-001 SC 190.0 mis 28.0abcd 66.0cdef 1.1a CM-001 SC 380.0 mis 44.0cd 52.0bcde 1.3a 3.4bc 91.0efghi 4.0bc 3.5abc 1.5ab CM-001 EC 95.0 mis 22.0abc 62.0cde 3.3ab 4.4bc 82.0bcdef 8.5de 5.0abc 4.5abc CM-001 EC 190.0 mis 50.0d 60.0bcde 3.9ab 8.3bcd 76.9bcd 11. Oe 4.5abc 7.6bcd CM-001 EC 380.0 mis 16.0ab 36.0abc 1.8a 3.1abc 95.0hi 3.5bc 1.0a 0.5a Confirm 2F 6.0 oz 40.0bcd 60.0bcde 1.7a 3.8bc 86.1cdefgh 9.9de 3.5abc 0.5a Lorsban 50 W 16.0 oz 16.0a 22.0a 1.3a 0.0a 95.0ghi 3.0bc 1.5a 0.5a Untreated Check 44.0cd 90.0f 11.0b 24. le 51.5a 10.9e 6.9bc 30.7e 1-Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P<0.05; Fisher's Protected LSD Test). Data transformed Arcsin (Sqrt X) prior to analysis. NESBITT ORCHARD % Infested Terminals % Damaged Fruit % Fruit in Different Categories at Harvest 20 Aug clean Fancy #1 Culls Treatment Amt. form/100 gal 11 Jul 23 Jul 2 Aug 1.7abc 2.3ab Dipel 2X IO.Ooz 14.0abc 4.0ab 0.7ab 0.6a 95.5cde 0.5ab 0.8abc l.la b 98.5e l.Oab 0.0a 0.5ab Dipel DF IO.Ooz 12.0abc 6.0ab Mattch L 32.0 oz 34.0cd 26.0cde 2.3abc 3.9ab 91.7bcd 2.0abc 1.5ab 4.9d 22.0abcd 28.0cde 13.5de 10.8bc 76.5a 5.1 be 4.9b 13.5f MVP-2 32.0 oz M/C 32.0 oz 24.0bcd lO.Obc 0.2ab 0.5a 95.6cde 2.0abc 0.0a 2.4bcd 2.3abc 3.5ab 87.8abc 2.0abc 4.4b 5.9de Compound A 2.4 oz 24.0bcd 14.0bcde Compound A 3.5 oz 6.0ab 6.0ab 0.0a 3.6ab 92.0bcd 0.5ab ' 3.0ab 4.5d Larvin 3.2 SC 10.8 oz 8.0a 6.0ab 0.0a 1.7ab 97.8de 1.7abc 0.0a 0.5ab CM-001 SC 95.0 mis 12.0abc 28.0cde 1.6abc 3.3ab 89.8bcd 3.3abc 2.0ab 4.8d CM-001 SC 190.0 mis 14.0abc 26.0cde 1.3abc 2. la b 90.2abcd 6.4c 1.7ab 1.7bcd CM-001 SC 380.0 mis 16.0abcd 12.0bcd 4.0bcd 3.7ab 96.5cde 1.2abc 0.7ab 1.7bcd CM-001 EC 95.0 mis 42.0d 34.0e 0.4ab 1.2ab 90.9bcd 2.0abc 4.0b 3. le d CM-001 EC 190.0 mis 22.0abcd 24.0cde 4.0bc 3.2ab 97.1 bed 1.4abc 3.4ab 3.6d CM-001 EC 380.0 mis 32.0cd 26.0cde 7.8cd 7. la b 95.9de 1.2abc 2.4ab 0.6abc Confirm 2F 6.0 oz 26.0bcd 16.0bcde 3.3bc 0.0a 96.5cde 0.0a 2.6ab 0.9abc Lorsban 50 W 16.0 oz 22.0abcd 0.0a 0.4ab 0.0a 99.5e 0.0a 0.5ab 0.0a Untreated Check 30.0cd 32.0de 19.2e 18.9c 80.6ab 3.2abc 3.5ab 12.6ef Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P<0.05; Fisher's Protected LSD Test). Data transformed Arcsin (Sqrt X) prior to analysis.
Arthropod Management Tests – Oxford University Press
Published: Jan 1, 1997
You can share this free article with as many people as you like with the url below! We hope you enjoy this feature!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.